Is an AK really that bad? - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion > AK & SKS Discussion > Is an AK really that bad?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2013, 12:09 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,377
Liked 2217 Times on 1302 Posts
Likes Given: 484

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PanBaccha View Post
Thanks for the heads-up on Sonny Puzikas. Brings me back, way back. Thanks.
Nyet za shtoh.
__________________
SSGN_Doc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2013, 12:34 AM   #12
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dearhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Charleston, SC,South Carolina
Posts: 1,206
Liked 898 Times on 434 Posts
Likes Given: 90

Default

How to hold and fire an AK 47

__________________

JP-US Naval Aviation AMSC 20 years ( retired) ASW/Aircrew Wings
US Naval Academy Shooting Instructor (Annapolis) and shooting team member
Alway keep your six covered

Dearhunter is offline  
theeuropeangoth Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 07:46 AM   #13
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,704
Liked 1106 Times on 614 Posts
Likes Given: 479

Default

1. If the AK-47 or AKM was considered current technology, then I wonder why the Russian Army currently uses the AK-74 or even more advanced variants of the AK pattern of carbines, rifles, and machine guns.

2. The AK-47 is minute of man accurate at 200 meters. The test that the Discovery Channel executed where an AK-47 carbine and M-16A1 rifle were tasked with striking a target at 200 meters was not a staged event. It's difficult for the majority of riflemen to hit a 200 meter target with the AK-47's iron sights. The AK-74, by virtue of the 5.45x39MM cartridge it fires, makes the task somewhat easier with a flatter trajectory. The problem is that fine accuracy with a notch and post is more difficult than it is with a peep or ghost ring sighting mechanism. That said, no first world military uses iron sighted rifles or carbines today. Most rifles and carbines, to include AK-47's, are more accurate than most of their users.

3. The AK-47 is significantly heavier than the VZ-58 that fires the same cartridge. The steel magazines have significant weight, too. Obviously modern AK variants and AK magazine variants have significantly reduced weight. Even so, there is no AK pattern carbine in the world that is within 1 pound of an AR pattern carbine in the same caliber. AK carbines are heavier than necessary and so are AR carbines with forged aluminum lower receivers and buffer tubes. If the AR carbine had a polymer lower receiver and buffer tube, then the weight difference would be even greater. Incidentally, a fully loaded 30 round polymer magazine for an AR-15 or AK-74 happens to weigh about 1 pound. Carry your carbine around through thick brush in the foothills for several hours or more when it's 95 degrees outside and let me know if you don't notice the extra pound of weight (or more) of an AK-47 over an AR-15.

4. The M43 pattern bullets have a center of gravity more near to the nose of the bullet than the M67 pattern bullets which have a center of gravity more near to the tail of the bullets. Obviously the lethality of a bullet that will yaw or tumble upon hitting flesh is greater than the lethality of a bullet that will punch a nice clean hole through flesh. Given the availability of hollow point and soft point ammunition to civilians, I don't think there's any disadvantage over any other assault rifle type ammunition.

5. The AK-47 carbines were not controllable in fully automatic fire, which is why the AKM carbines had forward vertical grips and muzzle brakes. There's nothing any stance or grip can do to change the fact that a rather large and heavy chunk of steel is banging around inside the receiver. There are machine guns like the Ultimax that operate on a "constant recoil" principle where the operating parts never impact the rear of the receiver during cycling. The Ultimax is controllable in fully automatic fire. The AK-47 obviously wasn't designed this way.

Bottom line is that better technology exists today and has for quite some time. The AK-47 and the improved variants aren't bad carbines, rifles, or machine guns but they're not the greatest thing since sliced bread, either.

If reliability is more important than anything else (weight, balance ergonomics, optics placement, or magazine changes), then the extra pound of weight in an AK-74 vs a M-4 isn't a big deal. If you're like me and weight, balance, ergonomics, optics placement, and magazine changes are a bit more important than absolute reliability, then the AK is not as desirable as the AR-15.

I own both and use both. There's nothing really "wrong" with the AK or AR carbines.

__________________
kbd512 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 11:56 AM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
70cuda383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Marysville,OH
Posts: 505
Liked 121 Times on 88 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dearhunter View Post
How to hold and fire an AK 47

There you go...video is better than a bunch of words! haha. that's basically what I was trying to say in my post. feet shoulder width apart, athletic stance so you can go left, right, forwards, backwards, and squared up to the target. NOT a weaver stance with feet front to back and the rifle across the front of your chest pointing wherever your shoulder is pointing.
__________________
70cuda383 is offline  
theeuropeangoth Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 12:55 PM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Chainfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,634
Liked 1489 Times on 901 Posts
Likes Given: 348

Default

As a practical weapon of war, the AK is a suitable firearm. It is simple enough for tribesmen to maintain. It is tough enough to work under conditions that would make an AR a lightweight club. It is not a target rifle. Minute of man at 200 meters is good enough for combat. If you are shooting longer than that you need a rifle, not a carbine or a submachine gun. The cartridge proved quite effective against Americans in Viet Nam.

At close quarters, such as urban warfare, the AK is equal if not superior to the AR, because of reliability issues in a dusty, gritty environment. Battlefields that offer very long fields of fire would give the advantage to the AR.

__________________

"It is better to be too skeptical then too credulous"

Carl Sagan

Chainfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 01:04 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
lbwar15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,016
Liked 293 Times on 221 Posts

Default

If the AK-47 is not obsolete then why did the Russians start using the AK-74? If the 7.62x36 is just as good as the 5.56x45 why did they go to 5.54x39? Is it bc the 5.54x39 performs more like 5.56x45? I thank it is.

So a gun that is accurate only out to about 200m is all I need? How do you know what I need? Maybe I need something with more range but don't wont to carry a 110ba. That would drop your rate of fire by more than I am willing to exchange for accuracy and range. Plus a 110ba in .338 is way to heavy.

Ask anyone who has ever bin in a fire fight if they won't a gun that you can only control if you shoot it a certain way. Sometimes you have to shoot leaning around a corner, under a car, crouching down, ext..... Sorry but I'm not all about spray and pray. Ill keep my AR.

__________________
lbwar15 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 05:23 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kryptar19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: arkansas
Posts: 1,734
Liked 628 Times on 373 Posts
Likes Given: 1684

Default

Cleaning a gun is a responsibility and if your only argument is that you don't have to clean your weapon, you have already proven that you are not responsible.
I've used both weapons extensively and seen them both give out. AK rifles need to be cleaned just like any other machine.
If you don't oil your car what will it do?
If you don't clean a gun it will fail..period.

AR's will work clean or dirty, wet or dry it doesn't matter. I trust mine with my life because I've seen what it can do under undesirable conditions. It doesn't take much to pop a pin, wipe out the action, and put a small drop of oil in a gun. AR's don't need to "run wet" either, that's a waste of oil. Just put a drop in the ports in the side of the bolt and you are good.

__________________

Last edited by kryptar19; 01-20-2013 at 05:26 PM.
kryptar19 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 08:44 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,377
Liked 2217 Times on 1302 Posts
Likes Given: 484

Default

AKs are usually more accurate than most people give them credit for. And ARs are usually much more reliable than most people give them credit for.

Don't feel under armed with either, just adapt to the platform and learn to maximize its potential.

__________________
SSGN_Doc is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2013, 10:46 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AleksiR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Helsinki,Finland
Posts: 425
Liked 32 Times on 28 Posts
Likes Given: 48

Default

As it has been already said, the AKs (I'm talking about the 7.62 variants) generally work well in what they were designed for. There are so many different variants out there, that it's impossible to simply say that AK is or isn't obsolete. Some models are, some are not. Also depends a lot what you are using it for. Reliability wise I'm a fan of the rifle. Ergonomics and accuracy? Not so much...

During my service I got a pretty good idea what the Valmet/Sako RK rifles are capable of but other than that my experiences are limited to civilian variants of AKs.

The way I was taught to shoot the RK was to square up to the target, support hand on the magazine, knees slightly bent leaning forward and elbows as close to my body as possible. I generally don't like the idea of holding the rifle by the magazine, but with the RKs ergonomics and the gear we were using it was ok and gave enough support to shoot fairly accurately in close quarters. Firing full-auto with the RK? Not really ideal. The rifle is equipped with a flash supressor, not a compensator so the muzzle climb is pretty wild. Off hand, with short bursts you could usually hit what you were aiming for if the target was within 50yds. With a lot of practice one could learn to tame the recoil but it isn't easy by no means. The civilian versions of RKs are capable of 1 MOA accuracy with good ammunition but most of the service rifles I saw were more like 4 MOA guns in the hands of conscripts. Still, most were capable of hitting man sized targets up to 400m with iron sights. Weight? 9.4lbs with a full magazine, so yes they are heavy but I still carried that rather than the KVKK62 or the PKM Generally very reliable rifles, during winter the selectors occasionally froze up, but that was fixed with a good whack on selector with the magazine. Usually all other hiccups were caused by the user him/herself. Personally experienced only one stoppage, light primer strike with blank ammo(super hard primer?), never had any problems with live ammo.

All in all, reliable, accurate enough, ergonomics suck. YMMV.

And please, let's not continue the AR vs AK debate. They are both good rifles, let's just leave it at that.

__________________
AleksiR is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2013, 12:41 AM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Harlingen,Texas
Posts: 67
Liked 9 Times on 6 Posts

Default

Lets see...if you live in a cave in the mountains in Iraq and have that or a rock to throw at your American "friends" you think the AK47 is a great weapon. When your buddies are toast, you can take their ammo and keep up the fight. Now is your gun absolete..I think not. You have in your hand the greatest rifle in the world, because it could save your life or end your enemies and it will shoot in a rainstorm or a dust storm. I had a SKS. Workmanship is a piece of crap, stamped out, cast iron nothin..but it will shoot like a champ. Now is it a good rifle? It will never be a Remington 700 but it does spit lead.

__________________
TexasRog is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes