Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > Why do Idiot's buy 338 Lapua Magnums?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2012, 02:42 PM   #41
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: \
Posts: 990
Liked 130 Times on 107 Posts
Likes Given: 43

Default

From what I have seen at the range is most shooters are worried about grouping. They want to put all the bullets in the same hole, despite being 3" from the bullseye. I would rather shoot a 3" group and have half my shots hit the bullseye. I am under the impression that a miss is a miss even if you miss by the same distance every time.


Old_Crow is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 02:50 PM   #42
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona,Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Liked 154 Times on 106 Posts
Likes Given: 119

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old_Crow View Post
From what I have seen at the range is most shooters are worried about grouping. They want to put all the bullets in the same hole, despite being 3" from the bullseye. I would rather shoot a 3" group and have half my shots hit the bullseye. I am under the impression that a miss is a miss even if you miss by the same distance every time.
Bench rest shooters do this all the time. The reason is they don't want to shoot out their aiming point. In bench rest shooting you are shooting to achieve the smallest size group possible. You are not scored on where that group happens to be on the target. The guns they use are highly specialized, and will never be used in the field for taking game. Because of that, where the shots land on the target is of no concern to them.


billt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 04:15 PM   #43
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 263
Liked 79 Times on 60 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillinger
I do believe you can attribute this to the great "gun training" influences of Counter Strike and other online "competitive" warfare models.

Didn't that Canadian Sniper with the "Longest Recorded Kill" use a Lapua? Yeah. Yeah he did. Accuracy International AWM in .338 Lapua.

What more do you need to read when you have too much money and not enough "manhood"?

JD
It was a royal marine sniper with that rifle who beat the canadians record. This was about 2/3 years ago i think.
lfcshooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 04:18 PM   #44
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tacticalfun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,224
Liked 479 Times on 329 Posts

Default

http://www.gizmag.com/worlds-longest-sniper-kill-247km/14992/
tacticalfun is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 05:30 PM   #45
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 263
Liked 79 Times on 60 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm

Many bullets yaw as they leave the barrel. As they travel down range the yaw is eliminiated as the bullet stabilizes. How consistently it does so has a bunch to do with long range accuracy. Really accurate long range bullets stabilize consistantly and do, in fact, get more accurate after several hundred yards. I know this sounds far fetched but it is true.
Spin and velocity stabilize the bullet .once a bullet leaves the barrel it will be at its highest velocity.after that gravitational forces and wind etc will effect trajectory. A bullet cannot yaw out of the barrel then correct its self. It will follow the path its been set until gravity/wind/pressure slows it down then it can be unstable towards the end of its flight . Issues with powder load, barrel,damaged bullet head etc. Can cause a bullet to be unpredictable.


lfcshooter is offline  
The_Kid Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Light magnums 1982flh80 Ammunition & Reloading 3 10-28-2011 05:10 AM
44 Magnums Ruzai Ammunition & Reloading 22 08-31-2011 03:29 PM
Police Issued .41 magnums rooster General Handgun Discussion 3 10-10-2009 03:15 PM



FOLLOW US ON