Sub-gun usefulness?
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

Sub-gun usefulness?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-27-2011, 04:15 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
eon047's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Middletown,New York
Posts: 38
Default Sub-gun usefulness?

I recently was having a discussion with a friend about the usefulness of a sub-gun system. I argued that the lighter weight and the milder recoil in general compared to a carbine in 16" in .223 would be superior. He argued in this day and age that a sub-gun was a dead system, and that a carbine in any rifle caliber would far outline the benefits of lighter weight and recoil. What do you guys think? Is the sub-gun a dead system or is there life for it still in different roles?
__________________
"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]
eon047 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 09-27-2011, 04:56 PM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,266
Liked 6820 Times on 3623 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

short barreled rifles have enormous issues with muzzle flash from the unburnt powder. they also lose a very large amount of energy from the extremely short barrels. so you end up with a bullet that generally is lacking energy huge flash issues.

pistol caliber subguns dont have those issues and usually work better due to the longer barrels than the pistols they were designed for. flash suppression is very very good

so in a situation like urban combat or police clearing houses or arresting violent felons a subgun does extremely well.

neither type does it all. they both have a definate use and role.
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent
JonM is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 05:07 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dunerunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florence, Oregon
Posts: 8,480
Liked 34 Times on 24 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Oh, Geez....I guess that MP5 just didn't cut it as an offensive weapons system. And let's throw in the Thompson Sub in .45APC as well....just not effective for close quarters combat...because that is what they were designed for!

A mid range machinegun (full auto or select fire) like the M16 was built to fulfill both needs and thus limit the amount of different ammunition and weapons systems on the battlefield. Times change, but the effectiveness of the sub weapons systems cannot be denied.
__________________
People get the government they deserve.
dunerunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 06:49 PM   #4
Lifetime Supporting Member
FTF_LIFETIMESUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
7point62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Decisive Terrain
Posts: 2,151
Liked 1519 Times on 764 Posts
Likes Given: 1163

Default

My experience with subguns is limited to an ancient M3 45 blowback greasegun I lugged around for a week as a kind of back-up/novelty. If you fire it at kevlar the rounds bounce off. BITD, however, when the only body armor was a shirt, it would have done the job.

An x2 re the MP5 etc. Some very good short shooters have been around in recent times. They have their place.
__________________
Hijo de mala leche
7point62 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 08:32 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
eon047's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Middletown,New York
Posts: 38
Default

I see. Now the question is in semi auto only do these guns fulfill those roles? Cause as a civilian most of us would have semi-auto only rifles and guns. So what role can a civilian use these guns for? Besides the cool factor
__________________
"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]
eon047 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 08:35 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
MrWray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,428
Liked 1040 Times on 621 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

even though they are extremely pricey HK has the best sub guns on the market. MP5, MP5sd, and the UMP45 are a few of the popular ones IMO
__________________
Semper paratus.....virtute et armis
MrWray is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 09:02 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,266
Liked 6820 Times on 3623 Posts
Likes Given: 513

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eon047 View Post
I see. Now the question is in semi auto only do these guns fulfill those roles? Cause as a civilian most of us would have semi-auto only rifles and guns. So what role can a civilian use these guns for? Besides the cool factor
because they are fun.

they make great guns for behind the seat or in the trunk defensive weapons

they make superb home defense weapons where the concussive blast from shotguns may be really problematic. try firing a shotgun or handgun inside a building. a pistol caliber rifle is not very abusive concussion wise. if you got an indoor range you frequent take the hearing protection off for one shot. that experience is very unique. a pistol caliber greatly reduces that abuse. it makes follow up shots much easier.

in border states they make outstanding defensive weapons in urban areas that have become extremely violent due to the lack of border security by george bush and barrack obama. not to mention eric holder and obama selling massive amounts of firearms to the drug lords on purpose.

civilians have far more right to be armed with military style firearms than police departments and the actual military does. the governments ability to have weapons comes from the civilians not the other way round and that is whats been long forgotten

a better question is what right does the police and military have for access to such weapons while denying them to the civilian population...
__________________
"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

"I crapped my pants to avoid the draft!!" -Ted Nugent

Last edited by JonM; 09-27-2011 at 09:05 PM.
JonM is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 09:14 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jjfuller1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: a place between here and there.
Posts: 4,657
Liked 1255 Times on 813 Posts
Likes Given: 792

Default

i really wish i had the cash to drop on a mp5. ive always love that setup. anyway. yes, sub guns or pistol caliber carbines are great for CQB. they give you ample stopping power, higher magazine capacity, and better accuracy then pistols themselves. and lighter, less recoil then shotguns. not intended for longer ranges. and ive never been in a house(very vew other buildings) that would need or even offer longer shots...

just the other day i saw a 9mm carbine getting fired. it painted a nice little pattern all over a 8'' bullseye at 100yds. and im sure that there are no bad guys that have a chest smaller than 8''
jjfuller1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2011, 09:23 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
eon047's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Middletown,New York
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
because they are fun.

they make great guns for behind the seat or in the trunk defensive weapons

they make superb home defense weapons where the concussive blast from shotguns may be really problematic. try firing a shotgun or handgun inside a building. a pistol caliber rifle is not very abusive concussion wise. if you got an indoor range you frequent take the hearing protection off for one shot. that experience is very unique. a pistol caliber greatly reduces that abuse. it makes follow up shots much easier.

in border states they make outstanding defensive weapons in urban areas that have become extremely violent due to the lack of border security by george bush and barrack obama. not to mention eric holder and obama selling massive amounts of firearms to the drug lords on purpose.

civilians have far more right to be armed with military style firearms than police departments and the actual military does. the governments ability to have weapons comes from the civilians not the other way round and that is whats been long forgotten

a better question is what right does the police and military have for access to such weapons while denying them to the civilian population...
Yes, that's what I've told anyone who would listen. We should be able to own fully automatic firearms of any nature.Ive been looking to get one of those Ump .45's in the sbr semi-auto nature. Ive seen a couple on gunbroker.com but can't really find reviews on those specific configurations. Hk does make some good subguns indeed. Thanks for the input guys. About to go find me some subguns for my home defense gun .
__________________
"To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege." [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)]
eon047 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2011, 01:54 AM   #10
Administrator
FTF_ADMIN.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 18,336
Liked 10954 Times on 4746 Posts
Likes Given: 1800

Default

SOME folks (Thank God, not me) live in areas where possession of a handgun is dang near impossible. But a pistol caliber semi-auto carbine IS allowed. In which case, that would look pretty good to me. If I can't have a 1911A1, then a Ruger Camp .45 would be a good second.
__________________
What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes




Newest Threads