Springfield 1903 Question


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > Springfield 1903 Question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2012, 01:53 PM   #1
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,184
Liked 2804 Times on 1621 Posts
Likes Given: 1220

Default Springfield 1903 Question

I have one with a 5 digit serial number that put the date of manufacture around 1905. It was rebarreled with a barrel marked 1942.

When it was rebarreled, would it have been test fired? Knowing about the receivers tempering problem back then, would the test fire have demonstrated that my receiver is okay?

Mine has cosmoline still.



__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 09-10-2012, 02:49 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,904
Liked 401 Times on 284 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

C3 ahould be along shortly to enlighten us all.

But


image-1303002701.jpg



__________________
ineverFTF is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 03:33 PM   #3
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,184
Liked 2804 Times on 1621 Posts
Likes Given: 1220

Default



Sorry, But when you've seen one, you've seen them all.
__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 03:36 PM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 16,577
Liked 8744 Times on 3779 Posts
Likes Given: 1342

Default

OK- here is the word- and I will say right now that some folks disagree with this.

Please note that if you do, you do not disagree with me- you disagree with the staff of the US Civilian Marksmanship Proram- so go talk to them.

C&P from the CMP website:

WARNING ON “LOW-NUMBER” SPRINGFIELDS

M1903 rifles made before February 1918 utilized receivers and bolts which were single heat-treated by a method that rendered some of them brittle and liable to fracture when fired, exposing the shooter to a risk of serious injury. It proved impossible to determine, without destructive testing, which receivers and bolts were so affected and therefore potentially dangerous.

To solve this problem, the Ordnance Department commenced double heat treatment of receivers and bolts. This was commenced at Springfield Armory at approximately serial number 800,000 and at Rock Island Arsenal at exactly serial number 285,507. All Springfields made after this change are commonly called “high number” rifles. Those Springfields made before this change are commonly called “low-number” rifles.

In view of the safety risk the Ordnance Department withdrew from active service all “low-number” Springfields. During WWII, however, the urgent need for rifles resulted in the rebuilding and reissuing of many “low-number” as well as “high-number” Springfields. The bolts from such rifles were often mixed during rebuilding, and did not necessarily remain with the original receiver.

Generally speaking, “low number” bolts can be distinguished from “high-number” bolts by the angle at which the bolt handle is bent down. All “low number” bolts have the bolt handle bent straight down, perpendicular to the axis of the bolt body. High number bolts have “swept-back” (or slightly rearward curved) bolt handles.

A few straight-bent bolts are of the double heat-treat type, but these are not easily identified, and until positively proved otherwise ANY straight-bent bolt should be assumed to be “low number”. All original swept-back bolts are definitely “high number”. In addition, any bolt marked “N.S.” (for nickel steel) can be safely regarded as “high number” if obtained directly from CMP (beware of re-marked fakes).

CMP DOES NOT RECOMMEND FIRING ANY SPRINGFIELD RIFLE WITH A ”LOW NUMBER” RECEIVER. Such rifles should be regarded as collector’s items, not “shooters”.

CMP ALSO DOES NOT RECOMMEND FIRING ANY SPRINGFIELD RIFLE, REGARDLESS OF SERIAL NUMBER, WITH A SINGLE HEAT-TREATed “LOW NUMBER” BOLT. SUCH BOLTS, WHILE HISTORICALLY CORRECT FOR DISPLAY WITH A RIFLE OF WWI OR EARLIER VINTAGE, MAY BE DANGEROUS TO USE FOR SHOOTING.

THE UNITED STATES ARMY GENERALLY DID NOT SERIALIZE BOLTS. DO NOT RELY ON ANY SERIAL NUMBER APPEARING ON A BOLT TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH BOLT IS “HIGH NUMBER” OR “LOW NUMBER”.



Bottom line- that rifle has undoubtedly been fired since leaving the arsenal (both times) however, SOME of the rifles in that range have a reciever that was not properly heat treated, and may fail in a catastrophic manner when fired. Probably not on the first shot.

As Clint Eastwood said "You have to ask yourself- do you feel lucky? Well.... do ya? "

__________________

<--- Your Moderators at our weekly Troll Hunt

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 03:43 PM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,422
Liked 5521 Times on 2883 Posts
Likes Given: 358

Default

The barrel isnt the problem its the reciever. Some are safe to fire some arent depends on what factory made them. The general rule is no low serial numbers are safe.

And c3 was faster with a more detailed reply. Damn this nook for no cut and paste

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...


Last edited by JonM; 09-10-2012 at 03:58 PM.
JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2012, 04:09 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
superc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Winchester
Posts: 341
Liked 15 Times on 9 Posts
Likes Given: 8

Default

Switch to Firefox 15. I can cut and paste here all day.

t bolts are of the double heat-treat type, but these are not easily identified, and until positively proved otherwise ANY straight-bent bolt should be assumed to be “low number”. All original swept-back bolts are definitely “high number”. In addition, any bolt marked “N.S.” (for nickel steel) can be safely regarded as “high number” if obtained directly from CMP (beware of re-marked fakes).

ibid.

__________________
superc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2012, 12:56 AM   #7
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,184
Liked 2804 Times on 1621 Posts
Likes Given: 1220

Default

You guys are good!
Thanks for the input.

Anyone looking for a wall hanger?



__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
1903 springfield shawnj488 General Rifle Discussion 5 07-23-2012 02:26 AM
1903 Springfield danf_fl General Rifle Discussion 10 10-23-2011 05:54 AM
Springfield 1903 danf_fl Curio & Relic Discussion 12 08-09-2010 01:17 AM
Another 1903 Springfield TXnorton Curio & Relic Discussion 15 06-21-2010 08:53 PM
1903 Springfield Morris General Rifle Discussion 2 05-23-2010 10:33 PM