You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

Savage Axis with Nikon Buckmasters 4-12x40


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2014, 01:30 AM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 7,553
Liked 1865 Times on 1203 Posts
Likes Given: 1789

Default Savage Axis with Nikon Buckmasters 4-12x40

I've had a huge gap in my arsenal for decades and finally decided to do something about it this year. That gap was a powerful rifle in a caliber that can really reach out and touch with authority.

The caliber was an easy decision for me - .308/7.62x51. While debates go on forever that there are better choices I couldn't ignore how popular it is, that it's 30 caliber and does everything well. Barrel life is very good, accuracy is great and it doesn't hurt that you can buy 20 rounds for $10.

I do have 30 caliber rifles: 30-30 and 7.62x39 that don't reach out with the authority of .308 and the powerful 7.62x54 but it isn't a modern round in a modern rifle.

With .308/7.62x51 settled it was tempting to go to the AR-10 family, especially since I'm a big AR-15 fan - but there are two disadvantages: weight and cost. Semiauto fire is a big plus but honestly I didn't need to fire one round per second.

So I decided on bolt action. There are a lot of excellent choices but I narrowed it down to the Savage Axis and Ruger American, two very similar rifles. Both are accurate, cheap and have a removable 4 round box magazine.

I chose the Axis XP with a Bushnell 3-9x40 scope and Next G1 camo polymer stock that Cabelas had on sale for $309 after a $50 rebate. I decided to move that scope to an AR-15 and today bought a Nikon Buckmasters 4-12x40 Cabelas has on sale for $142 (with military discount).

The rifle worked all right with the Bushnell scope but I think that scope limits the rifle so wanted something better. I'm expecting the Nikon with the BDC reticle zeroed to 100 yards will do exactly what I want.

Anyway, here are some pics!

Savage Axis with Nikon Buckmasters 4-12x40 - General Rifle Discussion


Savage Axis with Nikon Buckmasters 4-12x40 - General Rifle Discussion
__________________
______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek
Quentin is offline  
NotMormon Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 11-25-2014, 02:22 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
NotMormon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ogden,Utah
Posts: 675
Liked 415 Times on 240 Posts
Likes Given: 220

Default

I talked myself out of the same rifle at Cabelas yesterday. Looks like you are not filling a gap but rather adding to the power potential. How did you settle on .308? Seems to be the next logical step up the ladder. And bolt guns are just as much fun as AR's
NotMormon is offline  
Quentin Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2014, 03:12 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 7,553
Liked 1865 Times on 1203 Posts
Likes Given: 1789

Default

I also talked myself out of the Axis earlier this year. No doubt there are better bolt action rifles. But there's nothing really wrong with the Axis that can't be fixed easily (trigger) or worked around (high bolt throw) so with the rebate this time I couldn't resist. Sure, I'd love a finer rifle but the Axis will do 1 MOA which is all I need. Adding the Nikon 4-12x40 gets me out to 500 yards which is all I need. All for under $500 plus I have the Bushnell scope to put on a lighter recoiling AR.

As far as settling on .308/7.62x51, to me it was a no-brainer. Powerful, low price and available everywhere. In the lower 48 states having rifles in .308/7.62x51, .223/5.56x45 and 22LR pretty much covers all the bases.

Of course everyone has different needs so what works for me doesn't work for everyone.
__________________
______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek
Quentin is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2014, 11:53 AM   #4
JTJ
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 9,447
Liked 5266 Times on 2828 Posts
Likes Given: 1735

Default

Savage has rebates going right now.
__________________
Patron Member NRA
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
I was taught to respect my elders but they are getting harder to find.
JTJ is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2014, 12:51 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,624
Liked 2229 Times on 1531 Posts
Likes Given: 820

Default

I would take a step up the Savage ladder. The Axis is what it is. You have already mentioned replacing the trigger on the Axis. Savage has better rifle combo's with a Nikon scope and you will get a larger rebate to offset the cost of the better model. I am sure you have heard it before, buy once cry once.
John_Deer is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2014, 02:25 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Quentin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Northwest
Posts: 7,553
Liked 1865 Times on 1203 Posts
Likes Given: 1789

Default

No doubt there are better rifles than the Axis, in fact the Axis II has the Savage AccuTrigger and can be found with a cheap Weaver scope for $330 or so. I'm going to clean up the heavy trigger on the Axis and call it good. I'm very happy with this Axis with the Nikon scope. Power, accuracy and light weight at a great price. The rifle weighs 6.5 lbs and the scope adds 14 oz.

Some people hate the thin forend of the stock but I like it, and the camo finish is more interesting than black polymer.
__________________
______
The biggest issue with assembling an AR isn't so much getting the parts together right - it's getting the right parts together.
________________________________________
US Army 1966-69, VFW Life Member, Retired Geek

Last edited by Quentin; 11-25-2014 at 02:30 PM.
Quentin is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 01:41 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Salvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: High Cihuahuan Desert, West Texas
Posts: 633
Liked 276 Times on 196 Posts
Likes Given: 42

Default

That makes the weight come out about right. Good pick with the Axis. I've had good luck with Savage bolt guns, they've worked well for me.
__________________
Kind Regards, Salvo

When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead... It's a pain only felt by others.

- Same thing when you are stupid.
Salvo is offline  
Quentin Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 03:42 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6,624
Liked 2229 Times on 1531 Posts
Likes Given: 820

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin View Post
No doubt there are better rifles than the Axis, in fact the Axis II has the Savage AccuTrigger and can be found with a cheap Weaver scope for $330 or so. I'm going to clean up the heavy trigger on the Axis and call it good. I'm very happy with this Axis with the Nikon scope. Power, accuracy and light weight at a great price. The rifle weighs 6.5 lbs and the scope adds 14 oz.

Some people hate the thin forend of the stock but I like it, and the camo finish is more interesting than black polymer.
You can fix the issues with the stock for just a few dollars. It is easy to make a free floating barrel with gasket material. You can stiffen the stock with Styrofoam and fiberglass resin or you can cut the styrofoam for a bedding kit like you would use on a wood stock. You may like the stock just like it is. A couple of my nieghbors have Axis rifles. I didn't see anything intolerable about the axis.
John_Deer is offline  
Quentin Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 05:04 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Hookeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,226
Liked 451 Times on 292 Posts
Likes Given: 31

Default

The stock sucks. You can fill the forend and stiffen it but the problem is in two other areas...............#1 the wrist still flexes.

#2 the ergonomics (you'll probably need to make a cheekpiece). Kydex is cheap and works great

Trigger...........I got mine light and good, and safe............cost me $2.

When they first came out, nobody made a 1 pc base for it except for one place and it was $40.
Using 2 pc bases, on the long action............made it a tough deal to get some scopes set up correctly.

Yup..............long action. I dislike them for short action cartridges. And why I sold my tweaked Savage Axis even though it shot very well (.50" with WW factory 100gr .243 ammo).

The bolt sucks too, if you do mount a scope with a larger eyebell, or you get it low trying to run the stock as is...it'll hit. I scalloped and reblued mine, no big deal, bead blast made it look factory except in one view, since it has an odd draft to it and those cutouts.

The Boyds stock might help a bunch, but then you're putting another $100 into a cheap rifle.
Kinda defeats the purpose.

I got mine for a knock about yote rifle.............and got it pretty well set up. But the long action just killed it for me. Sold it and got another 700.

If they made a better stock from the start, and a short action........I might get another one for a truck gun. Mine shot way better than the purchase price would have suggested!

Last edited by Hookeye; 12-03-2014 at 05:15 AM.
Hookeye is offline  
Quentin Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2014, 05:09 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Hookeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,226
Liked 451 Times on 292 Posts
Likes Given: 31

Default

My rig also had the recoil lug not fully inset into the stock. Brass hammer solved that. Gasket for free float? WTF? You want that action bolted solid to the stock, and then you clearance the barrel channel. But then on bipods and or with flexy stock.........you're gonna touch now and then...........so you gotta stiffen the dang thing.

BTW, Tupperware stocks are easy to sand....call 'em Tupperware but they're probably some 30% glass filled polyester on the cheapies.

My preferred bedding material for them is Dexter Hysol aluminum filled Epoxy Patch. Had it at work Have also used the $15 big tubes of JB Weld from auto stores. It will throw the balance off (help or hurt?). To use less epoxy, one can place tubes in the hollows.

On my first 700 ADL synth I used stainless tubes. I think carbon arrows to be cheap and easier to find (cut offs from local archery shop).

Last edited by Hookeye; 12-03-2014 at 05:17 AM.
Hookeye is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Illinois **SOLD**Nikon Prostaff 4-12x40 with mounts purehavoc Firearms Parts and Accesories 3 08-12-2014 12:03 PM
Scope for a .300 WSM - Nikon 4-12x40 - Nikoplex or BOC? SubZero Optics & Mounts 29 11-18-2012 12:18 AM
Nikon for savage axis glockenstein Optics & Mounts 4 04-28-2012 01:55 PM
Is thete a Difference between the Axis and the Axis XP by Savage? DerHund15 General Rifle Discussion 3 12-02-2011 07:33 PM