Remington 770. Vs savage arms axis. - Page 11
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

Remington 770. Vs savage arms axis.


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2013, 02:56 AM   #101
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BULLET9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 79
Liked 15 Times on 12 Posts

Default

The one and only fatal flaw with the 770 is the crap trigger
BULLET9992 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 09:29 AM   #102
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: tokoroa,Waikato
Posts: 14
Default

Both guns are trash. The action in the 770 feels like sand paper on broken glass it lacks any refinement. In saying that i had one for a while and it shot well. So for a throw around tool that gets you hunting it will sufice, but not for me.
CreepingDeath is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 04:42 PM   #103
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
kaido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,764
Liked 365 Times on 232 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CreepingDeath
Both guns are trash. The action in the 770 feels like sand paper on broken glass it lacks any refinement. In saying that i had one for a while and it shot well. So for a throw around tool that gets you hunting it will sufice, but not for me.
Not to seem like a fan boy of the 770, but you have have just got a bad bolt.....mines really smooth and only binds the rare time.
kaido is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 06:27 PM   #104
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 112
Liked 22 Times on 18 Posts

Default

Besides the bolt problems in the 770 which seem to vary from one to another the major turn off for me on the 770 is you are not able to replace the barrel like you would the savage or ruger. The receiver and barrel are essentially one piece and once one is worn past operation then both are scrap.
E7018Dan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 07:14 PM   #105
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Zamzow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 478
Liked 25 Times on 20 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E7018Dan
Besides the bolt problems in the 770 which seem to vary from one to another the major turn off for me on the 770 is you are not able to replace the barrel like you would the savage or ruger. The receiver and barrel are essentially one piece and once one is worn past operation then both are scrap.
That was a huge reason why I went with the axis.
Zamzow is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2013, 11:13 PM   #106
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
longunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,176
Liked 190 Times on 151 Posts
Likes Given: 108

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by E7018Dan
Besides the bolt problems in the 770 which seem to vary from one to another the major turn off for me on the 770 is you are not able to replace the barrel like you would the savage or ruger. The receiver and barrel are essentially one piece and once one is worn past operation then both are scrap.
There's a legitimate piece of information and thanks for posting it. I always hear people bad mouthing the 770 but the only thing they say is that the bolt is rough.
longunner is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 12:21 AM   #107
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
godale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 161
Liked 18 Times on 15 Posts
Likes Given: 225

Default

the barrell problem is why i went with the stevens 200 a few years ago. more options and parts to choose from keep in mind when i bought my budget rifle i had the 770 and mossberg to choose from the ruger and axis didnt exsist
godale is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 01:47 AM   #108
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22397 Times on 12494 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

i have owned a M770 and have shot several in various calibers. mine in 30-06 was miserable as far as accuracy. also the trigger being heavy and gritty feeling and the bolt was very rough in usage. i noted the same in the several others i have shot. accuracy is the exception rather than the rule with the M770.

as entry level hunting rifle, IMO, it fails miserably. there are too many that cost at or near it's price point that are far better in accuracy and quality. such as the Marlin X7 series, the Savage Axis series, the Stevens M200, the Mossberg ATR 100, and several others as well. comapred to these, the M770 is not even worth consideration.

for the record i like Remington products and own several, but i would never even own or give consideration to the M770. if anyone has had a positive experiance with the M770 and finds them to be accurate for their needs, then i congratulate you on having one of the few rare ones that happens to be accurate and works as designed. enjoy it.

Quote: the barrell problem is why i went with the stevens 200 a few years ago. more options and parts to choose from keep in mind when i bought my budget rifle i had the 770 and mossberg to choose from the ruger and axis didnt exsist

Godale, i had a Mossberg ART100 in 30-06. very accurate rifle and other than it's brutal recoil, actually a dang nice rifle. the Mossberg would have been a better choice IMO.

Last edited by Axxe55; 03-29-2013 at 01:50 AM.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 02:14 AM   #109
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 820
Liked 157 Times on 115 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axxe55 View Post
i have owned a M770 and have shot several in various calibers. mine in 30-06 was miserable as far as accuracy. also the trigger being heavy and gritty feeling and the bolt was very rough in usage. i noted the same in the several others i have shot. accuracy is the exception rather than the rule with the M770.

as entry level hunting rifle, IMO, it fails miserably. there are too many that cost at or near it's price point that are far better in accuracy and quality. such as the Marlin X7 series, the Savage Axis series, the Stevens M200, the Mossberg ATR 100, and several others as well. comapred to these, the M770 is not even worth consideration.

for the record i like Remington products and own several, but i would never even own or give consideration to the M770. if anyone has had a positive experiance with the M770 and finds them to be accurate for their needs, then i congratulate you on having one of the few rare ones that happens to be accurate and works as designed. enjoy it.

Quote: the barrell problem is why i went with the stevens 200 a few years ago. more options and parts to choose from keep in mind when i bought my budget rifle i had the 770 and mossberg to choose from the ruger and axis didnt exsist

Godale, i had a Mossberg ART100 in 30-06. very accurate rifle and other than it's brutal recoil, actually a dang nice rifle. the Mossberg would have been a better choice IMO.
And as usually, I agree with axe. The Remington might be decent but there is better.
95sniper is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2013, 02:28 AM   #110
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22397 Times on 12494 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95sniper View Post
And as usually, I agree with axe. The Remington might be decent but there is better.
thanks Sniper. i just feel there are better choices in the same price range. for the person who hunts maybe once a year, who might shoot maybe one box of shells in a year, who is pressed for time and can't spend a lot on looking for a good rifle and needs one ready to go out the box and is willing to live with it's accuracy limitations and can't afford a lot of money for a hunting rifle, then the M770 might be an option if nothing else is available. that's no me.

i have bought used rifles that cost the same as M770 and find them to be superior in accuracy and function. i picked up two M700's last year that one cost me $250 in 270 and one for $350 in 30-06 that was scoped. they both needed cosmetic attention, but both are very, vry accurate. the 270 was made in 1969 and the 30-06 was made in 1971. bought both at a pawn shop.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Savage Axis .223 BlackBeautyF150 General Rifle Discussion 21 08-09-2012 06:43 PM
Savage Axis vs. Remington 770 vs. Ruger American ninjatoth General Rifle Discussion 14 07-26-2012 10:35 PM
Is thete a Difference between the Axis and the Axis XP by Savage? DerHund15 General Rifle Discussion 3 12-02-2011 07:33 PM
A new Savage Axis for me!! SoupNazi General Rifle Discussion 12 09-23-2011 01:32 PM