You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    

Firearm & Gun Forum - > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

Opinions on the 220 Swift

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-31-2009, 02:01 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: McConnellsburg
Posts: 21
Default Opinions on the 220 Swift

I was just curious about members opinions of the 220 Swift caliber. I have a Ruger M77 Mark2 chambered in the 220 Swift. I originally wanted the 22-250 or 223, but the only caliber available at that time was the 220 Swift. The gun shoots nice. Beautiful gun with a nice big fat barrel. A lot of weight to the gun. I have read that the 220 Swift wears out the barrels fast. Any truth to that? If so, what should I be looking for and what steps should I take to minimize the wear?

Donnyj is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 07-31-2009, 12:40 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
c3shooter's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 21,225
Liked 16324 Times on 6733 Posts
Likes Given: 2659


The 22-250 got the good press from gun writers. The 220 Swift got the groundhogs!

The Swift is really no harder on barrels than any hot, small caliber IF you do not try to wing every possible FPS out of the cartridge. If you are a handloader, adjust OAL length to match YOUR rifle, and keep loads moderate (old saying- fastest load, most accurate load- pick ONE)

Have an old Savage I have used for groundhogs and prarie dogs for years. Closest thing to a Death Ray I own. Flat, accurate, modest recoil, devastating on small varmints.

Have a smith check the leade- front of chamber, rear of start of rifling, looking for erosion from gasses. If OK, should stay that way.

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2009, 01:08 PM   #3
Lifetime Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
robocop10mm's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 11,395
Liked 4136 Times on 2111 Posts
Likes Given: 523


Keep it as cool and clean as possible. Thrat erosion can happen, but it is more likely in a hot, dirty gun.

Back off max loads to find the accurate load. The ground hog will not die any faster at 100 fps faster.

Copper fouling is a real issue. Use a good copper solvent bore cleaner like Shooter Choice or Sweet's. The copper fouling will screw up the accuracy long before the throat erosion will.
In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball
robocop10mm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2009, 05:29 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
stalkingbear's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 4,066
Liked 447 Times on 260 Posts
Likes Given: 226


I've built .220 & .220 ackley improved and they're no harder on barrel throats than other cartridges with that level of velocity. As robo stated, heat is the main enemy to barrel throats. Any cartridge with that velocity will have very high throat temperatures. Space your shots out 5 minutes between shots, & keep the bore CLEAN & free of copper deposits, and it'll last you a LONG time. A lot of people believe their bore is clean when in fact it's still dirty with copper deposits.
Sometimes you earthlings REALLY amaze me!
stalkingbear is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2009, 06:44 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 52 Times on 42 Posts


the 220 swift is the next best thing to a laser gun (which they will not let me have yet).

Just load to mid range velocities and watch barrel heat. The barrel steel is also much better today than it was 40 or 50 years ago.

My 220 swift had 5,000 rounds down it and it still shot sub .5" 5 shot groups any day of the week.
cpttango30 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2009, 03:36 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
R-BOLT's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Larned,Kansas
Posts: 229
Liked 3 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 2


Had a Ruger 220 swift also - bull barrel, trigger job, bi-pods, 4X18 redfield (I think that was the power) killed many a yote, cat, p dog wished I had it back. They are a great gun! Enjoy it. Sold mine due to losing all my good calling ground to the outfitters that moved in
R-BOLT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2009, 12:06 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: McConnellsburg
Posts: 21

Thanks for all the great info and advice. Since I don't hand load I should not have any problems. Thanks again everyone.
Donnyj is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 07:54 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4

If you do happen to burn that barrel up, go for the .204 ruger. What a round. I have two. A ruger predator and a remington r-15 carbine.

highpower24 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Need your opinions DonnyKC The Club House 16 06-23-2009 01:02 PM
.270 Win. or .270 WSM..Need Opinions WhiteWolf4 General Rifle Discussion 14 11-30-2008 11:56 AM
Swift Scirocco II acco Hunting Forum 1 04-03-2008 02:00 PM