Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   General Rifle Discussion (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f18/)
-   -   Nikon Monarch vs. Buckmaster (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f18/nikon-monarch-vs-buckmaster-59064/)

almostgotme 02-29-2012 05:41 AM

Nikon Monarch vs. Buckmaster
 
Im lookin at these 2 scopes for a .300 win mag that ive purchased. I know they arent zeiss glass but for about $400 they're pretty decent. I also know that the monarch series is supposed to be better quality than the buckmaster. If i were to buy one of these, the monarch would be a 4-16x42 mil-dot. The buckmaster would be 6-18x40 with a BDC reticle. Either way, i wanted to hear your two cents on these scopes.

Axxe55 02-29-2012 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by almostgotme (Post 723989)
Im lookin at these 2 scopes for a .300 win mag that ive purchased. I know they arent zeiss glass but for about $400 they're pretty decent. I also know that the monarch series is supposed to be better quality than the buckmaster. If i were to buy one of these, the monarch would be a 4-16x42 mil-dot. The buckmaster would be 6-18x40 with a BDC reticle. Either way, i wanted to hear your two cents on these scopes.

i have had the Nikon Buckmasters in 3-9x40, not bad, but prefer the Nikon Prostaff over it. my next Nikon will be the Monarch in 4-16x40. i am fixing to buy my father a Nikon Prostaff in 4-12x40 for his Winchester M70, that's wearing a 40 plus year old 3-9x40 Redfield scope. i am going to get it for him for Fathers Day early this year.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.