Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > looking for a hard hitting low recoil rifle

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2010, 02:51 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 77
Default looking for a hard hitting low recoil rifle

Ive been looking and have finally decided that it would be best for me, to have a rifle that hits hard, and has medium to low recoil. I will be hunting everything from deer, to moose. I would like to be able to shoot out to 400 yards on deer and elk. Does anyone have any suggestions?

__________________
270 win is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-14-2010, 04:06 PM   #2
Crazy Azz Redneck
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,308
Liked 989 Times on 565 Posts
Likes Given: 440

Default

Well there are several great calibers that will take whitetail at 400yrds,but unless you are sure of shot placement,why shoot that far at game?
243WSSM,25WSSM,25/06,270,7mm/08,308 are all great whitetail calibers for up to that range.
If your planning on shooting elk at that distance,you will just have to deal with a little recoil,IMO. You could kill an elk with any of the calibers listed above,but I personally would limit them to around 300yrd shots. For farther shots you really need to step up to a 7mm Mag,30/06,300 WM,or any other caliber that carries a good amount of energy that far down range.

__________________
Txhillbilly is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 08:59 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,838
Liked 622 Times on 427 Posts
Likes Given: 611

Default

Hard hitting and low recoil usually don't go together for a 400 yard slayer. I use a 9.3x57 w/ 286gr for 150 yards and under. A 6.5x55 w/ 140gr will do exactly what you want. It will hit w/ the same authority as a 180gr .30-06 w/ half the recoil. I became interested in the 6.5x55 after having my neck fused in a few places. The chunk of titanium helps also. I was a serious recoil junkie before that. The 6.5 has surpassed my wildest expectations.

__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 11:28 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 77
Default

When i say low to medium recoil levels, i count the 30-06 as fairly low btw. Has anyone here shot the 300 wsm, I've heard from some that they kick like a mule, and others say they don't kick at all.

__________________
270 win is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2010, 11:49 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,838
Liked 622 Times on 427 Posts
Likes Given: 611

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 270 win View Post
When i say low to medium recoil levels, i count the 30-06 as fairly low btw. Has anyone here shot the 300 wsm, I've heard from some that they kick like a mule, and others say they don't kick at all.
Sorry, I guess I'm a *****! I'll still shoot your eye out at 400 yards! MV is not even close to accuracy and penetration. Another magnum junkie. 400 yards is not that far. Gee the 6.5 has a better BC and sectional density, but getting more w/ less is not a thought. If you want something to blow the socks off a .300WM build a 6.5x06. I wish someone would have shown me the same thing years ago. The 6.5-06 has it all over the .264 Rem Mag., no barrel burn!
__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 12:19 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Gatekeeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Uniontown,PA
Posts: 3,710
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts

Default

If you reload I'd take a good look at the 280 remington or even better the 280 Ackley Improved.
30-06 parent case necked down to .284 (7mm). Huge selection of bullet styles and weights, some very well suited to long range hunting.

Its on my short list of rifles to build.

__________________

----------Gate
______________________________________________
Hellfire, Doom, Watch the hatred spin
Beyond the speed of sound---
Fire it up, Let the engines roll
It's time to burn it down

Gatekeeper is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 12:23 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ninjatoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Near Saginaw,Michigan
Posts: 1,371
Liked 103 Times on 83 Posts
Likes Given: 36

Default

270 Weatherby Magnum,they will take moose with it's 3500ft lbs of muzzle energy,they have harldy any recoil,and bullet weight varies from I think 100gr to 150gr which gives you alot of long range capabilities.

__________________
ninjatoth is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 12:34 AM   #8
Crazy Azz Redneck
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,308
Liked 989 Times on 565 Posts
Likes Given: 440

Default

Well J.P. likes the 6.5x55 and it is a great caliber,but it doesn't carry the amount of energy downrange that the 30/06 or 300 WM at 400yrds and it's falling pretty fast out there on ballistic charts.

6.5x55 Swedish

30-06

.300 Win. Mag.

If you like the 30/06,it is one of the best all around calibers for anything roaming North America. I have shot one for years. I just prefer a 300 WM for elk,and like the 25/06 for whitetail,mule deer,and antelope.

I know guy's that shoot the 300WSM and they like it,but the only thing I see is better than the standard 300 WM is a shorter action,ballistic wise it's a toss up between the two.If you reload,the brass is alot cheaper for the 300 WM,and the 300WSM ammo can be a little harder to find when your off the beaten path.

__________________
Txhillbilly is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 03:59 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 51
Default

i second the 280 rem . i have one and really like the round .

__________________
hdwrench is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2010, 05:09 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 77
Default

What about the 7mm remington mag

__________________
270 win is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Hard hitting, low kick-back rifle mammothchick67 Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 32 08-29-2010 12:35 AM
How hard was it to get your CWL? Unknown Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 38 11-20-2009 12:19 AM
Methinks they are looking too hard orangello The Club House 5 08-09-2009 02:41 AM
The Plague hitting Al-Qeida? skullcrusher The Club House 24 02-03-2009 12:36 AM