Considering rifle marksmanship: - Page 3
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

Considering rifle marksmanship:


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-2011, 12:27 PM   #21
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona,Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Liked 157 Times on 108 Posts
Likes Given: 119

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCH2FLY View Post
Perhaps you care to explain what you mean by "step up to 5.56" from .223. Frankly it makes no sense.
I think he was being sarcastic.
billt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 01:02 PM   #22
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Vincine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Adirondack Mts.
Posts: 3,495
Liked 1912 Times on 990 Posts
Likes Given: 1456

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billt View Post
I think he was being sarcastic.
I don’t think so. I found lots of stuff about it being okay to use a .223 in a 5.56 rifle, but lots of warning about using a 5.56 round in a .223 rifle. Apparently the 5.56 is provides higher pressure. As to whether this results in a straighter flight or harder hit, I don’t know. I couldn’t find ballistic charts on each seperately. They're both lumped together under .223.

I found this:

http://www.ar15armory.com/forums/556-223-Ammunition-Ch-t22582.html

>The primary difference between .223 Remington and 5.56 x 45 mm is that .223 is loaded to lower pressures and velocities compared to 5.56 mm. .223 Remington ammunition can be safely fired in a 5.56 mm chambered gun, but the reverse can be an unsafe combination. The additional pressure created by 5.56 mm ammo will frequently cause over-pressure problems such as difficult extraction, flowing brass, or popped primers, but in extreme cases, could damage or destroy the rifle. Chambers cut to .223 Remington specifications have a shorter leade (throat) area as well as slightly shorter headspace dimensions compared to 5.56 mm "military" chamber specs, which contributes to the pressure issues.<
__________________
"Sometimes I pretend to be normal, but it's boring and I go back to being me."
"You might as well be yourself, people won’t like you anyway."
"Tres verbo dictom"

Last edited by Vincine; 11-01-2011 at 01:26 PM.
Vincine is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 01:51 PM   #23
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TCH2FLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 182
Liked 11 Times on 8 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

I'm not going to get into the whole 5.56 into a .223 chamber thing ... it has been beaten to death.

I am more puzzled as to why he suggests that the 5.56 is a "step up" or that it is more suitable for hunting than .223.

Any attempt at sarcasm is lost on me, I did not see any relevance to the thread or any posts.
__________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions?
TCH2FLY is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 03:47 PM   #24
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston,MA
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCH2FLY View Post
I'm not going to get into the whole 5.56 into a .223 chamber thing ... it has been beaten to death.

I am more puzzled as to why he suggests that the 5.56 is a "step up" or that it is more suitable for hunting than .223.

Any attempt at sarcasm is lost on me, I did not see any relevance to the thread or any posts.
Maybe because 5.56 is 24.932735426008968609865470852018 bigger than .223?
ACRhino is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2011, 07:25 PM   #25
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona,Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Liked 157 Times on 108 Posts
Likes Given: 119

Default

If I had a dollar for every round of 5.56 MM I fired in .223 chambers, I wouldn't have to wait until 62 to retire.
billt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:46 AM   #26
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Txhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,647
Liked 1309 Times on 742 Posts
Likes Given: 633

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billt View Post
If I had a dollar for every round of 5.56 MM I fired in .223 chambers, I wouldn't have to wait until 62 to retire.
Amen,Brother.

Vincine,If the intended purpose of the rifle is just target shooting or small game hunting,a 223 caliber weapon will serve you very well,especially if your shooting 300 yards or less.If you intend on hunting bigger game,then a 308 would be better.But ammo cost will be a lot higher with the 308.
A standard length rifle stock shouldn't be a problem,but as others have said,a thicker recoil pad will solve any length problem.
Being that you live in NY,I'd stay away from the AR platform.You just never know what the elected elite are going to think up next about "Evil" black rifles.

Savage,CZ-USA,Howa,and Remington all make rifles that will shoot MOA or less out of the box,and even better with a little work and fine tuning.
Txhillbilly is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 03:06 AM   #27
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Vincine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Adirondack Mts.
Posts: 3,495
Liked 1912 Times on 990 Posts
Likes Given: 1456

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Txhillbilly View Post
Vincine,If the intended purpose of the rifle is just target shooting or small game hunting,a 223 caliber weapon will serve you very well,especially if your shooting 300 yards or less. . (snip) . . Savage,CZ-USA,Howa,and Remington all make rifles that will shoot MOA or less out of the box,and even better with a little work and fine tuning.
Thanks. Next stop; Checking out the range.
__________________
"Sometimes I pretend to be normal, but it's boring and I go back to being me."
"You might as well be yourself, people won’t like you anyway."
"Tres verbo dictom"
Vincine is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
VZ58 rifle vs. SKS rifle differences? orangello AK & SKS Discussion 4 07-12-2011 02:58 AM
Rifle 101: Rifle Actions. cpttango30 General Rifle Discussion 2 01-15-2011 05:51 PM
rifle mag primers -v- large rifle primers ricardo Ammunition & Reloading 14 11-17-2010 04:19 PM
NRA Marksmanship Qualifications Program Grayowl Training & Safety 1 12-18-2009 04:53 AM
Tips From Army Marksmanship Unit SGT-MILLER Training & Safety 18 02-17-2009 07:29 AM



Newest Threads