Breaking in a new gun
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > Breaking in a new gun

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2008, 04:18 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Catskill,New York "State"
Posts: 491
Liked 320 Times on 185 Posts
Likes Given: 354

Default The Democrats And Gun Control By David Kopel

From Todays Wall Street Journal---This Is Good Reading!!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120839466717921537.html?mod=opinion_main_comment aries

OPINION


The Democrats and Gun Control
By DAVID KOPEL
April 17, 2008; Page A19

Imagine an election race of Pat Robertson versus James Dobson, each of them appearing at organic grocery stores and Starbucks throughout Massachusetts, with each candidate insisting that he alone deserves the vote of gay-marriage advocates. An equally silly spectacle is taking place these days in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Indiana, West Virginia and Kentucky, as Sens. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama compete for the pro-gun vote.


Mr. Obama supports the Second Amendment – or so his surrogates have been claiming all over Pennsylvania, the state with the highest per-capita membership in the National Rifle Association. The effort was set back last weekend with the publication of Mr. Obama's remarks claiming that people in small towns in Pennsylvania and other Midwestern states "cling" to guns because they are "bitter" that the government has not solved their economic problems.

Mrs. Clinton shot back with an excellent speech in Valparaiso, Ind., recounting that her father had taught her how to shoot when she was a little girl. "People enjoy hunting and shooting because it's an important part of who they are," she said. "Not because they are bitter."


Surely she is right. The shooting sports culture in Pennsylvania was thriving long before the domestic manufacture of steel began to decline. Indeed, that culture was thriving before steel was invented. Pennsylvania's 1776 state constitution declared "That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the state . . ." A separate provision guaranteed "the liberty to fowl and hunt in seasonable times."

However, having the right to arms and the liberty to hunt is worthless if you can't buy a gun. In 1999, Mr. Obama urged enactment of a federal law prohibiting the operation of any gun store within five miles of a school or park. This would eliminate gun stores from almost the entire inhabited portion of the United States.

As a state senate candidate in 1996, Mr. Obama endorsed a complete ban on all handguns in a questionnaire. The Obama campaign has claimed he "never saw or approved the questionnaire," and that an aide filled it out incorrectly. But a few weeks ago, Politico.com found an amended version of the questionnaire. It included material added in Mr. Obama's handwriting.

When the U.S. Supreme Court voted last year to hear a case on the constitutionality of the Washington, D.C., handgun ban, Mr. Obama's campaign told the Chicago Tribune: "Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional" and that "local communities" should have the ability "to enact common sense laws." Other than Washington, D.C., the only American cities with handgun bans are Chicago and four of its suburbs. As a state senator, Mr. Obama voted against a 2004 bill (which passed overwhelmingly) to give citizens a legal defense against prosecution for violating a local handgun ban if they actually used the firearm for lawful self-defense on their own property.

Mr. Obama's campaign Web site touts his belief in the Second Amendment rights to have guns "for the purposes of hunting and target shooting." Conspicuously absent is the right to have firearms to defend one's self, home and family. In 2001, as a state senator, Mr. Obama voted against allowing the beneficiaries of domestic violence protective orders to carry handguns for protection.

Yet, as Mr. Obama has mockingly pointed out, Mrs. Clinton is not exactly a modern-day Annie Oakley wiling away weekends in a duck blind. As first lady, she helped organize the Million Mom March for "sensible gun laws" in 2000. It was led by the shrill gun prohibitionist Rosie O'Donnell.

Mrs. Clinton has repeatedly voted for antigun proposals, and co-sponsored many of them. After Hurricane Katrina, the New Orleans and St. Tammany police confiscated guns from law-abiding citizens, violating an explicit Louisiana law. In some cases, the confiscation was carried out with the assistance of federal agents, and was perpetrated via warrantless break-ins into homes.

The next year, the U.S. Senate voted 84-16 for a homeland security appropriations rider stating: "None of the funds appropriated by this Act shall be used for the seizure of a firearm based on the existence of a declaration or state of emergency." Mrs. Clinton was one of the 16 who voted "no." Mr. Obama commendably voted with the majority.

Forty states currently allow most law-abiding adult citizens to carry concealed handguns for lawful protection, after a background check and (in almost all such states) a safety class. Of course those laws only apply to carrying within the relevant state. Mr. Obama told the Chicago Tribune in 2004 that he favored a national ban on concealed carry, to "prevent other states' laws from threatening the safety of Illinois residents." Mrs. Clinton campaigned against a licensed carry referendum in Missouri.

Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama voted against legislation to stop mayors from suing gun manufacturers and gun stores because of gun crime. That legislation banned lawsuits only if businesses had complied with all laws regarding firearms manufacture and sales.

A presidential candidate could of course swear devotion to the First Amendment, while declaring that the amendment's purpose is to protect sports reporting and book collecting. And that candidate could still support government lawsuits against publishers, local bans on newspapers, and draconian restrictions on political commentary.

Civil libertarians who supported such a candidate because of his alleged love for the First Amendment would be foolish. Civil libertarians who support Mr. Obama or Mrs. Clinton because of their purported fealty to the Second Amendment may be bitterly disappointed.

Mr. Kopel is research director of the Independence Institute and co-author of the law school textbook, "Gun Control and Gun Rights" (NYU Press, 2002).

__________________
HankStone is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 04-18-2008, 06:51 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Default Breaking in a new gun

I am interested in getting a new rifle and was wondering what the proper (and best) way of breaking the gun in. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

__________________
redwheat is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 07:26 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redwheat View Post
I am interested in getting a new rifle and was wondering what the proper (and best) way of breaking the gun in. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
A little more detail would be helpful. Boltgun? AR/AK Variant? Hunting Rifle? Lever Action Cowboy Type? Semi-auto small bore like a 10/22? Shotgun?? ( technically not a rifle because of the smooth bore )

D
__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 08:14 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Ok. It is a Browning 7mm Rem mag with Boss. Bolt action.

__________________

Last edited by redwheat; 04-18-2008 at 08:15 PM. Reason: add information
redwheat is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 08:52 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3479 Times on 1609 Posts
Likes Given: 3590

Default

Here is a very useful thread that will show what one professional thinks and his reasons behind it.

Barrel Break In is one of those things that everyone has a separate opinion on, so I would probably take a concenscious from the friendly folks here and produce your own procedure.
__________________
Dillinger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2008, 02:14 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Thank-you very much Dillinger. That was very informative.

__________________
redwheat is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 12:22 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Does anyone else have any thoughts on the subject?

__________________
redwheat is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2008, 09:46 PM   #8
bkt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 6,973
Liked 1305 Times on 664 Posts
Likes Given: 151

Default

I broke in my AR barrel (chrome-lined) by firing a few rounds, cleaning, and repeating the process 'til I put around 100 through it, and the accuracy of the rifle is better than I'm likely to ever be.

It may not matter whether or not you break in a barrel. But if you do, the rifle won't be any the worse for your efforts and time.

__________________
bkt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2008, 10:26 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
RL357Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Albany,New York
Posts: 3,251
Liked 5 Times on 5 Posts

Default

My Rock River Arms AR-15 in .223 needed no barrel break -in. The manual stated it had been lapped at the factory, and consequently did not require a break in - I performed an abbreviated break-in nonethelss - the thought being that it would not hurt the gun, and being that I spent over $900 on it, It would be prudent to err on the side of caution.
My DPMS AR in .308 on the other hand stated that a break-in was strongly recommended. Their procedure was:

Clean after every shot for the first 25 rounds, then clean after every tenth shot for 100 rounds.
It was a pain in the ass and a very long day, but the gun shoots sub 1" groups, so, did it help? Who knows, but I did my part to ensure an accurate rifle. The temptation when one buys a new gun is to shoot it - avoid the temptation - the gun will probably last longer than you, so a small investment in time, in my opinion, is worth the trouble and peace of mind in the long run.
Incidentally, the DPMS manual stated that maximum accuracy will not be attained until approximately 200 rds. have been fired through the bore.

__________________
Guns Have Only Two Enemies-Rust and Politicians
"The United States Constitution (c) 1791 - All Rights Reserved"
If Guns Kill, Do Pencils Mis-spell Words?
Pain is Weakness Leaving the Body - USMC
"Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum"
RL357Mag is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
must see Ice pack breaking up Chester The Club House 14 11-15-2011 12:22 AM
Breaking in a new Barrel bessemerbob General Rifle Discussion 26 04-04-2009 12:11 AM
breaking down the glock 19 lovetoshoot Glock Forum 5 12-15-2008 06:54 AM
BREAKING - Gunman reported shooting on Illinois campus Chuck Legal and Activism 14 02-15-2008 04:28 AM