6.8mm SPC vs. .308 Win
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > 6.8mm SPC vs. .308 Win

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2009, 06:45 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
matt g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default 6.8mm SPC vs. .308 Win

Which would you prefer for a brush gun and why?

__________________

"'Did you ever wonder why we had to run for shelter when the promise of a brave new world unfurled beneath a clear blue sky? "
Roger Waters

Vote freedom, join the Libertarian Party.

matt g is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 11-27-2009, 03:10 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 5,093
Liked 747 Times on 522 Posts
Likes Given: 789

Default

1st off I have very limited experiance w/ 6.8spc. But with the info I do have there are still more variables to consider.
1, What is the bullet weight to be used in each?
2, What type of rifle would be used?
3, When talking brush, are you talking heavy scrub brush or dense woods?
4, What kind of game?

All of these would dictate what would work for a given purpose.

I bought a Browning BLR in .308 for Whitetail Brush hunting here in the North East & topped it w/ a 3-9x40mm scope. I have the ability to reach out to 300 yards if the situation presents itself. I use 165gr SP bullets.
My go to heavy growth medium game rifle is a 9.3x57 Husqvarna w/ express sights. 286gr semi jacketed or cast lead bullets don't deflect as easily as a smaller, faster bullet. 2200fps is the average MV. Velosity at 150 yards is 1710 w/ 1850fp of energy. Bullet drop is 1.8" w/ 100 yard zero.

If I was hunting Coyotes that all changes.

__________________
jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2009, 03:13 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 36 Times on 30 Posts

Default

Neither

45-70 or 500 smith would be my first two choices for dense cover hunting rounds.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2009, 03:17 PM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 18,031
Liked 5990 Times on 3133 Posts
Likes Given: 427

Default

i use my .458winmag for hunting deer and up. i bow hunt as well and dont carry a gun for that. its a bit more exciting when your in bear country

i like the .458 for general hunting as you have to get close to be effective and it can be loaded as low as 45=70 levels or all the way up to tungsten carbibe cored rounds for elephant and cape buffalo. mostly i use 350 grn bulllets at 45-70 pressure.

__________________
JonM is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2009, 07:14 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mrm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,432
Liked 327 Times on 219 Posts
Likes Given: 30

Default

My brother has been dinking around with the 6.8 SPC ammo for about a year now. What he is finding is that the 6.8 SPC round has surprisingly similar ballistic traits to that of the .308 Win. out to 400 yards. He's been using Hornaday 110 gr. ammo in the 6.8 SPC and will soon be playing with the 130 gr. ammunition to take his experimenting further. My thoughts, however is that a heavier grain weight bullet should perform better in the brush than a lighter grain weight bullet. When I used to hunt deer here in California, I used a 30-30 Winchester as a brush gun and swore by that round for this application. The areas I used to hunt the brush was moderate to thick in Manzanita, Madrone, Scrub Oak and Pine. (between 2500 to 3500 feet in elevation) At that time I was taking my deer at an average of +/- 70 yards with iron sights. If I were to go hunting again in these same growth areas I would probably choose the .308 Win. with 185 gr. bullets over the 6.8 SPC with its lighter gr. bullets. Actually I'd probably go back to the 30-30 round for hunting in this kind of growth. I think, however, that if I were to hunt in a area with less bursh as potential obsticals, I believe the 6.8 SPC would be fine and do a good job taking deer meat.

__________________
mrm14 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 06:47 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
matt g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm14 View Post
My brother has been dinking around with the 6.8 SPC ammo for about a year now. What he is finding is that the 6.8 SPC round has surprisingly similar ballistic traits to that of the .308 Win. out to 400 yards. He's been using Hornaday 110 gr. ammo in the 6.8 SPC and will soon be playing with the 130 gr. ammunition to take his experimenting further. My thoughts, however is that a heavier grain weight bullet should perform better in the brush than a lighter grain weight bullet. When I used to hunt deer here in California, I used a 30-30 Winchester as a brush gun and swore by that round for this application. The areas I used to hunt the brush was moderate to thick in Manzanita, Madrone, Scrub Oak and Pine. (between 2500 to 3500 feet in elevation) At that time I was taking my deer at an average of +/- 70 yards with iron sights. If I were to go hunting again in these same growth areas I would probably choose the .308 Win. with 185 gr. bullets over the 6.8 SPC with its lighter gr. bullets. Actually I'd probably go back to the 30-30 round for hunting in this kind of growth. I think, however, that if I were to hunt in a area with less bursh as potential obsticals, I believe the 6.8 SPC would be fine and do a good job taking deer meat.
This is the info I'm looking for as you're hunting the same terrain and vegetation types that I hunt and take the same shots that I'd be taking.

When I used to go out with my dad, I'd use an older Winchester 30-30 that weighed close to 20 pounds when it was fully loaded. The old lever action carbines are great brush guns, but I'd like to stick with a bolt action. Ruger makes a nice looking M77 compact that I'm eyeing up.
__________________

"'Did you ever wonder why we had to run for shelter when the promise of a brave new world unfurled beneath a clear blue sky? "
Roger Waters

Vote freedom, join the Libertarian Party.

matt g is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 10:34 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mrm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,432
Liked 327 Times on 219 Posts
Likes Given: 30

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt g View Post
This is the info I'm looking for as you're hunting the same terrain and vegetation types that I hunt and take the same shots that I'd be taking.

When I used to go out with my dad, I'd use an older Winchester 30-30 that weighed close to 20 pounds when it was fully loaded. The old lever action carbines are great brush guns, but I'd like to stick with a bolt action. Ruger makes a nice looking M77 compact that I'm eyeing up.
That Ruger M77 compact looks like a perfect bolt brush gun. What do you think of the Laminate Compact M77? It appears to be only $60.00 more than the regular stock.
__________________
mrm14 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 08:36 PM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
matt g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrm14 View Post
That Ruger M77 compact looks like a perfect bolt brush gun. What do you think of the Laminate Compact M77? It appears to be only $60.00 more than the regular stock.
I really like wood. I can live with synthetics. I really dislike laminates.
__________________

"'Did you ever wonder why we had to run for shelter when the promise of a brave new world unfurled beneath a clear blue sky? "
Roger Waters

Vote freedom, join the Libertarian Party.

matt g is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 11:57 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mrm14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 2,432
Liked 327 Times on 219 Posts
Likes Given: 30

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matt g View Post
I really like wood. I can live with synthetics. I really dislike laminates.
Yeah. I'm kind of a wood guy myself. But, you have to admit that some of those lamnate wood stocks look kind of cool.
__________________
mrm14 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2009, 06:38 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 192
Default

308 in a Savage 99 if I had my druthers. Easier and cheaper to load for and you get 308 performance with spire points in a lever gun. Either cartridge will work for brush hunting with similar deflection. The biggest issue with brush hunting is how close you are to the brush when you shoot, the closer you are the more deflection there will be downrange. It's not an issue of caliber for the most part. You don't need a 45-70 heavy loaded with 535gr Postells for "brush-busting".

__________________
Dcomf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes