.44Mag vs Spitzer-pointed ".30-30?"
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > .44Mag vs Spitzer-pointed ".30-30?"

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2011, 07:50 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default .44Mag vs Spitzer-pointed ".30-30?"

I have a Single-shot .308 rifle with a 16.4" barrel. I bought the rifle to get into long-range shooting, but after only a couple hundred rounds I found my interest in longer-range precision shooting dropping pretty quickly. So, I took off the Bipod and threw an old Red-Dot on there to turn it into a compact backpacking or "stalking"-type rifle.

But, I kindof realized that between the short barrel, the relatively fast powder I'm using (H335), and the minimum loads I've been sticking with, I am ballistically just a small notch above .30-30 performance--I am estimating a 150gr bullet @ 2450fps at around 40k PSI. Granted, I am using spitzer bullets rather than round-nose, but terminally there shouldn't be much of a difference, especially within expected practical ranges.

So, after realizing I basically had a really loud .30-30 that just used more powder, I began to compare it back to .44mag. I can get almost the same energy and arguably better terminal performance with a .44mag rifle compared to the above specs, at least within the 100-150yd max ranges I see for myself. But, the .44 gives much easier reloading (and I already have all the stuff to load .44mag), and it is easier to make lighter loads for moderate use. Plus the same types of loads (hog hunting loads, to small game loads) are all a bit cheaper.

Here is a vid of my GF shooting it just to show how loud it is even with the starting-level loads. I could load it with Unique and get the same bullet at about 1900-2000fps with about the report of a .40 handgun, but that really doesn't get me much in the way of terminal effectiveness.


So, for a general-purpose rifle, should I go back to the .44mag? The most likely practical use is probably Hog sometime soon, then maybe deer, and finally Zombies. I am expecting shots inside 100 yards, with 150 being pretty much the max I'd ever need to shoot beyond just fun at the range.
handi_308_hog_34.jpg  
__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 12-05-2011, 02:37 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
303tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,959
Liked 1342 Times on 912 Posts
Likes Given: 1443

Default

Are you kidding, a .30-30 is twice as fast & has a 1000 ft. lbs. more energy than a .44 Mag. let alone a .308........

__________________

When all else fails.

303tom is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 03:06 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SW OK
Posts: 4,596
Liked 2258 Times on 1228 Posts
Likes Given: 3528

Default

Until about 1940 the .44-40 had killed many more deer than the .30-30. The .44-40, when loaded to rifle velocites, is more effective on deer sized game than the .30-30 at at close range. When loaded to rifle velocities the .44 magnum is more effective than the .30-30 at close range. i own a semi-auto Ruger rifle in .44 magnum. My hunting handload gets 1,900 fps with the 240 grain .430 Hornady XTP bullet. At 100 yards that bullet carries 1,400 foot pounds of energy. A 170 grain .30-30 bullet with a muzzle velocity of 2,200 fps develops 1,500 pounds of muzzle energy at 100 yards.

Most of my hog hunting is done with a muzzleloader. My bullet of choice for the muzzleloader is the 240 grain .430 XTP, the same bullet i use in my .44 magnum. The muzzle velocity from my muzzleloader is about 1,800 fps. i've killed over 200 wild hogs with that muzzleloader and bullet combination. It is much more effective on hogs than a .30-30. Energy is not everything.

__________________
alsaqr is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 02:38 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Molon Labe,Missouri
Posts: 553
Liked 79 Times on 65 Posts
Likes Given: 40

Default

The 44mag outshines the 30-30 in close range, NOT in velocity, but in knock down power. I have both a 30-30 and 44mag and I love them both, but my 44mag puts an immediate "toe tag" on any animal within 75yds.
Del

__________________
Triumphman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 02:43 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 303tom View Post
let alone a .308........
Please refer to my original post. Yes I am shooting a rifle chambered in .308 but with ballistics much closer to .30-30 (only about 50fps faster than a standard 150gr .30-30 load, actually).

Quote:
Originally Posted by 303tom View Post
Are you kidding, a .30-30 is twice as fast & has a 1000 ft. lbs. more energy than a .44 Mag.
Not really. As mentioned above, my .308 loads come to about 1900-2000FPE. I can load a 200gr XTP to about 2100fps and get about 1950FPE. But the heavier bullet gives more reliable performance and arguably better "killing power" if one goes more by the TKO principles. A 170gr .30-30 bullet will indeed have about 100FPE more muzzle energy than a 240gr .44mag Bullet, but I do wonder how much of a difference that 400fps will make when the .44 bullet is like 40% heavier.



But you guys are saying the .44 would be a better choice for me than my current setup?
__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 03:01 PM   #6
JTJ
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JTJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 6,601
Liked 2399 Times on 1296 Posts
Likes Given: 690

Default

Dont forget that new soft tip pointed bullets are now available for the 44.

__________________

Patron Member NRA
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
I was taught to respect my elders but they are getting harder to find.

JTJ is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 03:01 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dks7895's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St. Charles,Missouri
Posts: 467
Liked 12 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindenwood View Post
So, for a general-purpose rifle, should I go back to the .44mag? The most likely practical use is probably Hog sometime soon, then maybe deer, and finally Zombies. I am expecting shots inside 100 yards, with 150 being pretty much the max I'd ever need to shoot beyond just fun at the range.
I am not a big fan of a break barrel single shot for hogs or zombies, where a quick follow up shot may be necessary. Within 150 yards a 30-30 or 44mag lever gun would be my choice.
__________________
dks7895 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 03:47 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 659
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Heh, true, but I've got other stuff for those cases as well :P . I am just trying to make this rifle as useful and practical as possible for what it is and for its intended uses. Given I already have all the .44mag reloading equipment, I could sell my .308 equipment for more than what it would cost to have a .44mag barrel installed.

__________________
Lindenwood is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 05:06 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dks7895's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St. Charles,Missouri
Posts: 467
Liked 12 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindenwood View Post
Heh, true, but I've got other stuff for those cases as well :P . I am just trying to make this rifle as useful and practical as possible for what it is and for its intended uses. Given I already have all the .44mag reloading equipment, I could sell my .308 equipment for more than what it would cost to have a .44mag barrel installed.
Sounds like a plan. I vote for a 44mag barrel.
__________________
dks7895 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 06:14 PM   #10
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
303tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,959
Liked 1342 Times on 912 Posts
Likes Given: 1443

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindenwood View Post
Please refer to my original post. Yes I am shooting a rifle chambered in .308 but with ballistics much closer to .30-30 (only about 50fps faster than a standard 150gr .30-30 load, actually).


Not really. As mentioned above, my .308 loads come to about 1900-2000FPE. I can load a 200gr XTP to about 2100fps and get about 1950FPE. But the heavier bullet gives more reliable performance and arguably better "killing power" if one goes more by the TKO principles. A 170gr .30-30 bullet will indeed have about 100FPE more muzzle energy than a 240gr .44mag Bullet, but I do wonder how much of a difference that 400fps will make when the .44 bullet is like 40% heavier.



But you guys are saying the .44 would be a better choice for me than my current setup?


Sectional Density
__________________

When all else fails.

303tom is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
"Do "Gun-Free" Zones Encourage School Shootings?" cnorman18 The Club House 26 04-17-2012 10:57 PM
S&W 29 Classic 5" 44mag beckstactical Revolver Handguns 8 10-25-2010 03:59 PM
A U.S. Census worker "had been confronted by residents who pointed wldennis The Club House 11 05-24-2010 09:41 PM
A "pointed" discussion on .270 ammo for hunting king1138 General Rifle Discussion 10 05-08-2010 06:40 AM
Witloe Remington 1858 New Model Army "Lee" & "Grant" bprevolver Blackpowder & Musket 0 09-26-2008 12:11 AM