 |
|
11-23-2008, 09:25 PM
|
#1
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 58
|
.270 Win. or .270 WSM..Need Opinions
Need some opinions on the above .270 Win and .270 WSM for hogs and deer size game??? Pros and cons on reloading and such....WhiteWolf
|
|
|
|
11-23-2008, 10:56 PM
|
#2
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
Really, the only benefit of the WSM over .270 Win is the shorter bolt throw.
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2008, 11:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 58
|
Thanks for the info, mattg...I guess it would send it down range a little faster, but would it be worth the expense, I wonder....WhiteWolf
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2008, 11:49 PM
|
#4
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
Ballistics, velocities and terminal ballistics are similar between a given load and it's WSM or WSSM counterpart. The differences are so little that it really just boils down to a shorter action.
I was considering a .300 WSSM and after some research, came to this conclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
11-24-2008, 12:05 AM
|
#5
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I see you, and you will not know when I will strike
Posts: 24,301
Liked 3452 Times on 1597 Posts
Likes Given: 3590
|
I have to agree. You are getting, what, about 150+/- feet per second of a .270 versus a .270WSM in the same length barrel? Allegedly it shoots flatter, but are you really taking 800 yard shots on game?
The barrel life in any of the small caliber, magnum driven rounds is definitely less than their long action counterparts - so that is a consideration.
Wolf - as we have discussed, I think you are fine with a .270 for your applications. The .243 is another good cartridge - though the .270 hits a bit harder and has a better chance with a larger deer sized game, there is no reason a good marksmen with a .243 couldn't bring down the same animal.
It all comes down to preference, but in my opinion, you can't go wrong with a good .270 for just about every field application in medium and smaller animals of all kinds.
JD
|
|
|
|
|
11-24-2008, 12:13 AM
|
#6
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 58
|
I think you're both right....With what I'm hunting, the short bolt throw will not give me that much speed(which I don't need)...And longer barrel life would be a must...I would have no need to be making even a 400 yd shot in mississippi....WhiteWolf
|
|
|
|
|
11-28-2008, 09:38 PM
|
#7
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sidney,Oh.
Posts: 449
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Another thing to consider is availablity of ammo. If a store carries ammo it will usually have .270 Win., but alot of them won`t have .270 WSSM. If you shoot only your own load that won`t matter much.
__________________
Catfish
Ohio
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:23 AM
|
#8
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 58
|
I went with the .270 Win....It should be here monday or tuesday...Sorry, been stuck in Austin, Tx over the holidays....WhiteWolf
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:30 AM
|
#9
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,885
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts
|
What rifle? I have quite a bit of experience with .270 Win. My dad's Winchester Model 70 (pre '64 no less) provided us with tens of thousands of pounds of meat while I was growing up.
Last edited by matt g; 11-30-2008 at 04:44 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2008, 04:52 AM
|
#10
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 58
|
Hello matt,
Ordered a Weatherby Vanguard .270....It should be in sometimes monday or tuesday.....Gonna go with a Leupold scope...Was looking at the Mark 2 Hunter...Any comments on that particular scope...
http://leupold.com/tactical/products/scopes/mark-2-riflescopes/mark-2-3-9x40mm-hunter/
Need some opinions here...This is my first adventure with bolt action rifles...So, knowledge is a little short around here....WhiteWolf4
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
|
|
|
