Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > 270 vs 7mm-08 bullet damage

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2013, 01:09 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 157
Liked 13 Times on 9 Posts

Default 270 vs 7mm-08 bullet damage

Which of these two has a greater performance?



__________________
Armed-Citizen is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 02-01-2013, 01:16 AM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TLuker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: S.C.
Posts: 2,461
Liked 1073 Times on 694 Posts
Likes Given: 1996

Default

Depends. Normal hunting ranges I would take the 7mm-08 all day long. Out west on really flat ground with +400 yard shots I would probably go with the .270.

Just my .02



__________________
TLuker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 01:20 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
savageman97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 133
Liked 16 Times on 7 Posts

Default

I love the 7mm-08! Its my favorite cartridge ever! It is incredibly versatile Especialy if u reload! I have used it on deer and elk and with my custom loads I can make 300 yard shot with ease....kinda lol

__________________
savageman97 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 01:25 AM   #4
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They are actually pretty close. Both are accurate. The .270 may have an edge in velocity, but not a lot. The 7mm-08 offers a greater selection of bullet weights which can be important to the handloader. Factory ammo may be a little more plentiful in .270. You might want to consider the fact that the 7mm-08 is built on a shorter action where as the .270 is built on a longer action. So, six of one half a dozen of the other. You can't really go wrong with either.
cottontop

__________________
 
JimRau Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2013, 01:31 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4788 Times on 2678 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

I wonder? I would go with the .270 WCF for Western hunting. The larger 30-06 engine compared to the smaller .308 engine gives the old .270 an important edge.
And if you are turned on by metrics the .270 is after all a 7.03-06. caliber rifle.

__________________
nitestalker is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2013, 02:21 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Free State of Winston, AL
Posts: 2,613
Liked 1603 Times on 952 Posts
Likes Given: 788

Default

If I had to own just one of them it would be the 7-08. I have used a 270 A LOT and now I own the 7-08. I think the 7-08 is more versatile than the 270 due to bullet selection. Basically, I can do anything the 270 can do with my 7-08 and MORE!!!

__________________

An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!

JimRau is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 11:42 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Va. mnts
Posts: 210
Liked 32 Times on 27 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

Short vs long action would be the more critical decision for me.Both chamberings have their strong points.

__________________
Intheshop is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2013, 02:37 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 240
Liked 72 Times on 57 Posts
Likes Given: 13

Default

I agree with all of the above posts. Both are great cartridges. I've never owned a 7-08 but it's close enough my favorite, the .308Win, for me.

__________________
RUG3R44 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 10:00 PM   #9
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
locutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 8,796
Liked 5154 Times on 2940 Posts
Likes Given: 4369

Default

Both good rounds. I would choose 7-08 myself due to the amount of meat the higher velocity .270 will ruin at close range.

__________________

"Politics is the art of the possible" Otto von Bismarck.

locutus is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 10:18 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,916
Liked 672 Times on 462 Posts
Likes Given: 675

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitestalker View Post
I wonder? I would go with the .270 WCF for Western hunting. The larger 30-06 engine compared to the smaller .308 engine gives the old .270 an important edge.
And if you are turned on by metrics the .270 is after all a 7.03-06. caliber rifle.
.68 is not 7mm, it is .270. The 7mm is larger then .270. The 6.5 is smaller then .270. Where does 7.03 come from???? I don't have a 7mm-08, but it is a fine cartridge. I prefer 7mm rem Mag and 6.5x55. .270 is redundant to what I have, and does not add any advantage. What have you been smokin'?


__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
What type of bullet causes this kind of damage? starviego Ammunition & Reloading 20 05-13-2012 08:36 PM
Lead bullet too big for RCBS .380 bullet seater The Man Ammunition & Reloading 3 10-17-2011 02:04 PM
Will this ammo damage my .22? bushtucker .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 9 03-10-2009 02:17 PM
.357 damage ear drums Ohgr Revolver Handguns 17 03-19-2008 02:40 PM