.204 Ruger vs .233 - Page 2
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

.204 Ruger vs .233


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-25-2011, 01:56 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 5,197
Liked 776 Times on 542 Posts
Likes Given: 842

Default

Either will work w/ the .223 being less expensive to shoot.
__________________
Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.
jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 02:00 AM   #12
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22310 Times on 12476 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris338 View Post
It will b for Coyote out past 300 yards where my .17 won't reach em
you still haven't given details as to what type of gun that you want to build. bolt action, semi auto, single shot, ect. ect. what about scope choices? more information is needed to help you make better choices that will help you build a gun that will serve it's intended purpose.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 02:08 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Clermont, FL,Florida
Posts: 155
Default

Just wondering are you stuck on 204 or 223, if it where me building a long range coyote gun I would go with a 22-250 kinda get the best of both world
Mossyoakman3006 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 06:16 AM   #14
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
303tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,405
Liked 1592 Times on 1078 Posts
Likes Given: 1728

Default

Six of one, half dozen of another !
__________________
When all else fails.
303tom is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 09:41 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Roanoke VA
Posts: 171
Liked 48 Times on 28 Posts
Likes Given: 18

Default

[QUOTE=chris338;586210]It will b for Coyote out past 300 yards where my .17 won't reach em[/QUOTE

The 204 has limited bullet choices compared to the 223
Hairtrigger is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 12:13 PM   #16
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
303tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,405
Liked 1592 Times on 1078 Posts
Likes Given: 1728

Default

Why not go with something in 06, a whole lot of bullets there from 65 to over 200 grains, just a thought.
__________________
When all else fails.
303tom is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2011, 12:50 PM   #17
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
Liked 22310 Times on 12476 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

[quote=Hairtrigger;586404]
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris338 View Post
It will b for Coyote out past 300 yards where my .17 won't reach em[/QUOTE

The 204 has limited bullet choices compared to the 223
the 223 has a lot of offerings in bullet choices, but bullets for the 204 are getting better, with hornady having four, ranging from 24gr to 45gr weights. so the 204 is getting better in choices, and maybe even getting more in the future.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger LCR afi1 Range Report 10 05-08-2011 09:35 AM
Ruger LCP cbw Range Report 6 07-05-2009 08:08 PM



Newest Threads