204 Ruger Question - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > 204 Ruger Question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2013, 07:25 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
its a decent round under about 250 yards. once you get past 200 or so it starts dropping like a rock. its purely a short range bullet. friend of mine has a savage in 204 its fun to shoot but 223 is a better round
I fully agree the 223 is better the 204 is also to expensive to shoot in volume when compared to the 223
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 09:35 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sarg1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 136
Liked 12 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muliemaster View Post
Ughhhh a 204 fan phewwwwyyyyy sorry axxe the 22/250 is better lol
Yes, I really like my .204, and yes, as with anything else, less expensive if you reload, but I reload rounds not really available locally. I like the 39 grain softpoint and 40 grain softpoints.... .only v-Max i like is the 32gr.
__________________
sarg1c is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 09:51 PM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarg1c View Post
Yes, I really like my .204, and yes, as with anything else, less expensive if you reload, but I reload rounds not really available locally. I like the 39 grain softpoint and 40 grain softpoints.... .only v-Max i like is the 32gr.
The reason I said expensive in bulk shooting is some dont reload, I load as well, with that said the 223 is way cheaper than all but the .17 hmr to shoot. The 204 is ok, but its a niche caliber. I had to have one but just dont use it like my 22/250. But it is a great round I was joking to AXXE thats all.
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 10:04 PM   #14
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 28,735
Liked 21641 Times on 12276 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muliemaster View Post
The reason I said expensive in bulk shooting is some dont reload, I load as well, with that said the 223 is way cheaper than all but the .17 hmr to shoot. The 204 is ok, but its a niche caliber. I had to have one but just dont use it like my 22/250. But it is a great round I was joking to AXXE thats all.
i agree with the 204 being a niche round, not really doing something that can't be accomplished with what was already available, eg:; the 223, 22-250, 22 Swift, 222 Rem. Mag, or even the 17 Rem. but as a niche round, it's fun to shoot and reload for.

like Mulie, i just had to have one! i have many calibers that in some ways are just shooters and that i just enjoy shooting for the pure fun of it.
__________________
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 10:27 PM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axxe55 View Post

i agree with the 204 being a niche round, not really doing something that can't be accomplished with what was already available, eg:; the 223, 22-250, 22 Swift, 222 Rem. Mag, or even the 17 Rem. but as a niche round, it's fun to shoot and reload for.

like Mulie, i just had to have one! i have many calibers that in some ways are just shooters and that i just enjoy shooting for the pure fun of it.
Damn new stuff that comes out, always have that gotta have me sticker put on it huh
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 01:56 AM   #16
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 28,735
Liked 21641 Times on 12276 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muliemaster View Post
Damn new stuff that comes out, always have that gotta have me sticker put on it huh
i know what you mean!

that new 17 WSM coming out has my name all over it!
__________________
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 02:12 AM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: fordland,missouri
Posts: 11,099
Liked 862 Times on 648 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axxe55 View Post

i know what you mean!

that new 17 WSM coming out has my name all over it!
I'm gonna rechamber a savage 93R17 bvss for this cartridge if I can get my hands on the ammo to spec it out.
__________________
Marlinman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 12:44 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Prairie Dog Country
Posts: 123
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Some have limited experience but have a right to their openion. Take a look at a Rifle Ballistics table that can be found in Hornady, Remington, Federal and other cartridge cataloges. With rifles sited in at 200 yards per the Hornady table the 204 32 Gr bullet is 4.1 In low at 300 Yds. The 40 Gr bullet is 5.5 inches low at 300 Yds thats fired from a 223 Rem rifle. The same 40 Gr bullet fired a 22-250 Rem is 4.5 In low at 300 Yds. The table also list the ft/lb of energy of the bullets at various yards. Reloaders can use a bullet that is best for the varmints hunted and which is the most accurate in their rifle. But every rifle is different , the most accurate reload for my 17 Rem uses on the low side powder charge while my 17 Fireball uses a powder charge on the high side . There is very little difference in the MV when using the same grain bullet per my crony. I live in prairie dog country and started shooting them in 1949 with a 22 RF rifle. I have shot them with 17HM2, 17 HMR, 17 Fireball, 17 Rem, 204 Ruger, 22 LR RF, 22WMR, 22 Hornet, 221 Fireball, 222 Rem, 223 Rem, 22-250 Rem, 220 Swift, 243 Win, and some of my big game rifles. I will be getting a 17 Hornet and the new Winchester 17 MRF when they become available. I reload ammo for my centerfire rifles. If I could have only one rifle for p dog shooting it would be the 204 Ruger, for a 2nd rifle a 17 HMR. If I expected to see a Yote the 220 Swift would also be with me, but the 204 with 39 Gr bullet can do fine for the range I could see them at.

__________________
tuck2 is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 06:20 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sarg1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 136
Liked 12 Times on 10 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

I agree with you guys on the .204 One of my favorite cartridges and love to reload for it... As axxe 55 states not a lot it will do that cannot be done with something else, so why such a following on the .308, A .30-06 can do what it will, SOOO. who realy cares, I like both, .204 and .308., I like the .17HMR but want a .17 Hornet or even a .17 WSM. but it makes my .17 no less one of my favorite ....

__________________
sarg1c is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2013, 04:11 AM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 71
Liked 16 Times on 12 Posts

Default

I was sure glad to own the 204ruger today. Stopped at every gun store within 10 miles of the house including cabelas and gander looking for 223 bullets and none were to be found. Most everyone had plenty of 20 cal. Pills!!! Maybe that's the 204's niche? If so I'm all right with that.

__________________

Last edited by kingrider; 01-16-2013 at 04:13 AM.
kingrider is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
ruger 10/22 question hawkguy .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 6 05-13-2012 11:43 PM
Question about my new Ruger III 22/45 Matt Williams General Handgun Discussion 3 06-05-2010 05:29 PM
Ruger Security Six Question Elemental Revolver Handguns 6 12-22-2009 02:03 AM
Ruger question ebear Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 4 07-02-2009 03:57 AM
Ruger Charger Question R-BOLT General Handgun Discussion 2 01-29-2009 08:39 PM