Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > 204 Ruger Question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-09-2013, 03:06 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
Posts: 302
Liked 31 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default 204 Ruger Question

This seems like a great round, but don't know much about it. Anyone out there shoot it? Do you like it? Pro's/Cons?

__________________
northhike is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 01-10-2013, 12:49 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,898
Liked 663 Times on 454 Posts
Likes Given: 668

Default

I had an old friend that passed away. He shot a CZ527 in .204. He could drop a coyote out to 350 yards.

__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 06:43 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northhike View Post
This seems like a great round, but don't know much about it. Anyone out there shoot it? Do you like it? Pro's/Cons?
Im not into it, this imho tho an only mine, its a fast pretty flat shootin yote buster but the cost for those that dont reload is just well to high to volume shoot. Plenty of punch for any small game, has become a pretty common round easy to buy ammo, very min recoil so all day shooting is a breeze. I have an old remington in 22/250 as well as a .204 but just dont grab the 204 much. Poor lil thing wants to play but I dont let it out much. Im just stuck on my ol 22/250
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 06:44 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by northhike View Post
This seems like a great round, but don't know much about it. Anyone out there shoot it? Do you like it? Pro's/Cons?
After alot of shootin it tho the only con is the price of ammo for those that dont reload. In that case the .223 is best bet
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 05:48 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 71
Liked 16 Times on 12 Posts

Default

It's a wonderful little round with 0 recoil! Pretty cool to be able to watch your impacts through the scope. Yea you can find 223 ammo cheaper but it's as cheap and in some cases cheaper than 22-250, and definitely cheaper than 220 swift. If a guy owns a good 223 or 250 I wouldn't say the 204 is a must, but I love mine and carry it as much as the others!

__________________
kingrider is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 05:58 PM   #6
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East Texas, Texas!
Posts: 26,795
Liked 19501 Times on 11072 Posts
Likes Given: 49115

Default

i like my Remington M700 in 204 Ruger! very fast and flat shooting. little recoil and easy to reload. doesn't require a large amount of powder to exceed 4000 FPS muzzle velocity. i use mine for target shooting, but it's an excellent round for varmint hunting at reasonable ranges. quite a few rifles are chambered in this round, so there are many choices to be made.

__________________
Coming from the Village of the Damned.
Resist all Tyranny and Oppression.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 06:42 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axxe55 View Post
i like my Remington M700 in 204 Ruger! very fast and flat shooting. little recoil and easy to reload. doesn't require a large amount of powder to exceed 4000 FPS muzzle velocity. i use mine for target shooting, but it's an excellent round for varmint hunting at reasonable ranges. quite a few rifles are chambered in this round, so there are many choices to be made.
Ughhhh a 204 fan phewwwwyyyyy sorry axxe the 22/250 is better lol
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 06:51 PM   #8
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Axxe55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East Texas, Texas!
Posts: 26,795
Liked 19501 Times on 11072 Posts
Likes Given: 49115

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muliemaster View Post
Ughhhh a 204 fan phewwwwyyyyy sorry axxe the 22/250 is better lol
i agree that the 22-250 is better. able to exceed the distances of the 204 using a bit heavier bullet. but the 204 is a very accurate round that has next to no recoil, and is a lot of fun to shoot. if used one for hunting, i would probably lean towards the 22-250. the 204 is a niche round that's just a nice round that's fun to shoot and good for varmint hunting at reasonable distances. also if you reload, there are much more bullet choices for the 22-250 than the 204.
__________________
Coming from the Village of the Damned.
Resist all Tyranny and Oppression.
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 07:13 PM   #9
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 16,910
Liked 5105 Times on 2655 Posts
Likes Given: 310

Default

its a decent round under about 250 yards. once you get past 200 or so it starts dropping like a rock. its purely a short range bullet. friend of mine has a savage in 204 its fun to shoot but 223 is a better round

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 07:24 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,193
Liked 121 Times on 86 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by axxe55 View Post

i agree that the 22-250 is better. able to exceed the distances of the 204 using a bit heavier bullet. but the 204 is a very accurate round that has next to no recoil, and is a lot of fun to shoot. if used one for hunting, i would probably lean towards the 22-250. the 204 is a niche round that's just a nice round that's fun to shoot and good for varmint hunting at reasonable distances. also if you reload, there are much more bullet choices for the 22-250 than the 204.
I fell for a 204 but just shoot it much im still stuck to my 22/250 nuthing wrong with a 204 tho
__________________
Muliemaster is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
ruger 10/22 question hawkguy .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 6 05-13-2012 11:43 PM
Question about my new Ruger III 22/45 Matt Williams General Handgun Discussion 3 06-05-2010 05:29 PM
Ruger Security Six Question Elemental Revolver Handguns 6 12-22-2009 02:03 AM
Ruger question ebear Auto & Semi-Auto Discussion 4 07-02-2009 03:57 AM
Ruger Charger Question R-BOLT General Handgun Discussion 2 01-29-2009 08:39 PM