Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion > 1917 Enfield SMLE mk3 303?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2011, 02:06 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Eglin AFB,Florida
Posts: 2
Default 1917 Enfield SMLE mk3 303?

I recently was given this rifle it says its an 1917 enfield smle mk3 303 rifle.
I searched all over the internet trying to find info about it and pictures that look like it. I cant find anything that looks like it, all the pics i found have different looking barrel they are shorter snub barrel. So Im looking for anyone who has any info to help me decide if its a fake or if it is real and perhaps the barrel has been replaced or if its original. I know the strap and shock absorber on the barrel arent original, but I really dnt have a lot of knowledge about antique rifles, so if you have any info that could help me out I would appreciate it if you emailed me back.

Thanks Brian J

enfield-303.jpg   enfield-303-2.jpg   enfield-303-4.jpg   enfield-303-5.jpg   enfield-303-6.jpg  

__________________

Last edited by briandj; 01-03-2011 at 01:38 AM.
briandj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 01-02-2011, 03:20 AM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 16,325
Liked 8390 Times on 3630 Posts
Likes Given: 1291

Default

This is a SMLE- click here:Collecting and Shooting the Enfield No. 1 Mk III - HISTORY

Further down on the same site is the US Mdl 1917- there was an earlier version made in .303 for the Brits. One of the two should be your rifle.

Your pics are pizza boxes, can't see. Us the paperclip to the right of the white smiley face icon on the toolbar above your posting to attach pics,

__________________

What we have heah is.... failure to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:42 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Eglin AFB,Florida
Posts: 2
Default enfield

thanx for the reply i reuploaded the pics you should be able to see them now. It doesnt look like the other pics of the enfield mk3 rifle i have found on the webor even the pics on the link you sent me. Its got me confused, Im just trynna figure it out

__________________
briandj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:52 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
TimL2952's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lockport,New York
Posts: 1,324
Liked 188 Times on 131 Posts
Likes Given: 303

Default

your enfield is a sporter version....same as the military version in every aspect except for the barrel, fore grip and sights. my friend has one too...ill try to get some pics

__________________
TimL2952 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 11:47 AM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 16,325
Liked 8390 Times on 3630 Posts
Likes Given: 1291

Default

Yep- it started life as a military rifle, but was "sporterized". Common thing to do between wars, when milsurp rifles were cheap. Unfortunately, that killed the value to a miltary collector, leaving only it's value as a shooter. But that was a SMLE.

__________________

What we have heah is.... failure to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:37 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
dteed4094's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 767
Liked 48 Times on 37 Posts
Likes Given: 44

Default

here are some informative sights;
http://www.diggerhistory.info/pages-weapons/303.htm
Ian Skennerton's
Surplusrifle Forum • Index page

__________________

"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling, which thinks nothing is worth war, is worse. A man who has nothing which he cares more about than his own personal safety is a miserable creature, and has no chance of being free unless he is made free and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself" John Stuart Mill
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of
Paul.

dteed4094 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 07:28 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Phelenwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 856
Liked 17 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 52

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c3shooter View Post
Yep- it started life as a military rifle, but was "sporterized". Common thing to do between wars, when milsurp rifles were cheap. Unfortunately, that killed the value to a miltary collector, leaving only it's value as a shooter. But that was a SMLE.
I hate it when people take a great rifle and try to "sporterize" it. My wife picked up a 1917 Enfield in 30-06 for me a couple of years ago. What the guy ended up doing was cutting off the rear leaf sight guards on it to try and mount a scope. $1500 rifle sold for $100 some people just do not know what they are doing.
__________________
Phelenwolf is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 09:16 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jpattersonnh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South central,NH
Posts: 4,916
Liked 672 Times on 462 Posts
Likes Given: 675

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phelenwolf View Post
I hate it when people take a great rifle and try to "sporterize" it. My wife picked up a 1917 Enfield in 30-06 for me a couple of years ago. What the guy ended up doing was cutting off the rear leaf sight guards on it to try and mount a scope. $1500 rifle sold for $100 some people just do not know what they are doing.

Why are you yelling??
In the 1950's, '60's, and '70's you could buy most surplus rifles for under $20.00. For the budget minded poor guys that needed a hunter, it was a good deal! They removed all the weight they could and had a rifle that could put meat on the table. It happened all the time. It is not your rifle, so get over it!!!
In 1976 I was making $3.00 an hour off the books, minimum wage was $1.95 I think. I wanted a rifle to hunt w/ so I could go out w/ my buddies. The shop my Dad took me to had wooden barrels filled w/ Arisaka s, MKIII's, Mausers, most w/ cracked handgaurds or stocks, rust, for under $30.00. I ended up buying a New Mossberg 12ga bolt/ slug gun w/ irons for $60.00. You need to look at it in that context. I was really styling in the Mountains of Eastern NY back then. At the time the surplus rifles were considered old relics that were outdated at the end of the war. What was the cost of 100 pounds of meat in 1976? Chicken was .39cents, Chuck(beef) .59 cents. Do the math and figure that 2 to 3 people would use that rifle to fill a $5.00 tag from their license. A $45.00 investment could yield 300 pounds of meat the 1st year. The next year it cost $15.00. That would equate to a 5.75 pound piece of chuck today or 25 pounds back then. 300..25, 300..25.
__________________

Freedom is not free. The best of us always leave too soon.

jpattersonnh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 10:31 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 33 Times on 28 Posts

Default

$1500 1917 LOL Now that right there is funny.

I have a 1917 that had the rear sight milled off. I never understand the guys that get all bent out of shape over a stupid hunk of metal. It is a rifle it is meant to shoot. If it was meant to be collected it would be wrapped in wax paper with a nasty piece of rock hard chewing gum.

Would I sporterize a M98, 1903, 1917, M1, Krag now no I wouldn't not a big deal. If some one wants to put time and money into THEIR rifle and you don't like it SHUT YOUR MOUTH and move on.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2011, 10:42 PM   #10
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,134
Liked 5274 Times on 2750 Posts
Likes Given: 333

Default

if money was tight why spend more money wacking bits off a rifle and spending more money on a scope for a gun that already had very good sights?? never understood that thought process.

whomever original bought it its their right to destroy it. no matter how silly it is.

__________________

"Gun control: The theory that a woman found dead in an alley, raped and strangled with her panty hose, is somehow morally superior to a woman explaining to police how her attacker got that fatal bullet wound." — L. Neil Smith

The problem with being stupid is you cannot simply decide to stop doing dumb things...

JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
1917 Enfield repair Phelenwolf Curio & Relic Discussion 1 12-27-2010 01:56 PM
SMLE Enfield Question machelis General Rifle Discussion 3 04-07-2009 03:37 PM
smle in 7.62 nato herp_man2003 General Rifle Discussion 3 02-22-2008 04:48 AM