You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    

Firearm & Gun Forum - > Long Guns > General Rifle Discussion >

17 Hornet vs 17 Rem?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2013, 01:17 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Tjurgensen's Avatar
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 85
Liked 7 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default 17 Hornet vs 17 Rem?

I have been looking at these calibers and want to know the pros and cons of each and how they compare. Any advice would be appreciated.


Tjurgensen is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 07-04-2013, 01:59 AM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
c3shooter's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 21,307
Liked 16480 Times on 6794 Posts
Likes Given: 2690



The .17 Hornet, also known as the .17 Ackley Hornet, is a .17 caliber centerfire rifle wildcat cartridge originally made by P.O. Ackley in the early 1950s. The cartridge was created by simply necking-down the .22 Hornet to .17 caliber. The result was a small case with relatively little noise capable of high velocity.

Ackley mentions it as one of the most balanced of the .17 cartridges of his time. [1]

This cartridge is now available as a factory loading; the 17 Hornet from Hornady uses a 20grain "Superformace" V-max projectile at a published velocity of 3650fps. [2] However, the new standardized ammunition/brass is not built to the same dimensional specifications as the original wildcat or the dimensions listed on this page. Hornady's standard has a shorter body, shorter overall case length, and a thicker rim. Shooters wishing to use the Hornady product in a Wildcat .17 Hornet chamber will experience the bullet jumping to the rifling and lose the inherent accuracy the cartridge has been known for, if the rim thickness allows the firearm to function at all. Many firearms that have offered the Wildcat .17 Hornet depend on rim thickness for headspace. In such firearms, shooters may not be able to use the new ammo/brass without having their chambers modified for the thicker rims. This may allow the Hornady products to function, but again are likely to reduce accuracy significantly.

The .17 Remington was introduced in 1971 by Remington Arms Company for their model 700 rifles.

It is based on the .223 Remington, necked down to .172 in (4.37 mm), with the shoulder moved back.[2] It was designed exclusively as a varmint round, though it is suitable for smaller predators. There are those such as P.O. Ackley who used it on much larger game, but such use is typically not recommended.

Extremely high initial velocity (over 4000 ft/s 1200 m/s), flat trajectory and very low recoil are the .17 Remington's primary attributes. It has a maximum effective range of about 500 yards (460 m) on prairie dog-sized animals, but the small bullets' poor ballistic coefficients and sectional densities mean they are highly susceptible to crosswinds at such distances.

The smaller .172 bullet typically has a much lower ballistic coefficient than other typical varmint calibers, such as that of the .223 Remington. Because of this, the .172 bullet loses velocity slightly sooner and is more sensitive to wind; but by no means does this render the cartridge useless. The advantages of this cartridge are low recoil, flat trajectory, and minimal entrance wounds. The tiny entrance wound and usual lack of exit wound on coyote-sized animals makes it an ideal round for fur bearing animals which the hunter intends to collect a pelt from. A significant disadvantage is the rapid rate at which such a small-caliber rifle barrel can accumulate gilding metal fouling, which is very detrimental to accuracy and may also eventually result in increasing pressures caused by the fouling's constriction of the bore.[3][4] Many .17 Remington shooters have reported optimum accuracy when the bore is cleaned after every 10 - 20 shots,[3][4][5] though more modern metallurgy used in both barrels and bullets has largely mitigated the alleged fouling issue.

The .17 Remington is also one of the few cartridges in which powder charge weight is often greater than bullet weight. Though this condition has been known to degrade accuracy, the .17 Remington is noted for exceptional accuracy.[4] This reputation for accuracy is undoubtedly due in no small part to the fact that only good quality bolt action and single shot rifles have been so chambered from factory. Because the cartridge is based on the .223, it can also be used in the AR-15 and Ruger Mini-14 semi-automatic rifles by simply replacing the barrel.

And there are also the .17 caliber rimfires.
What we have here is... failure- to communicate.
c3shooter is offline  
texaswoodworker Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2013, 07:06 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Catskill,New York "State"
Posts: 491
Liked 320 Times on 185 Posts
Likes Given: 354


I call the 17s in general as fine pelt calibers with minimum damage to hides,the only drawback is the 17s are not fond of wind,along with special cleaning rods and etcetera,the above is why I prefer the 222 Remington hand loaded,but a 17 in the hands of a Rifleman/critter hunter is fine.
HankStone is offline  
MisterMcCool Likes This 
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger 77/22 in .22 Hornet Yamahog12 General Rifle Discussion 14 02-25-2013 10:14 AM
Fox gun 204. 17 hnr, 17 hornet mrbirdguy General Rifle Discussion 7 10-19-2012 11:26 AM
Ruger 77/22 .22 Hornet rebarreled to .17 Ackley Hornet?? hurricane52 Gunsmithing Forum 3 02-29-2012 04:55 AM
.223 from a hornet maggg General Rifle Discussion 5 07-16-2009 10:00 PM
N/E Firearms 22 Hornet randy General Rifle Discussion 2 05-16-2008 03:19 AM