Originally Posted by jjones45
I'd say the trigger pull is better than the ruger lcp. The 45 shield has arguably the best trigger pull in the m&p lineup
"best trigger pull" compared to what (?????)
I`m a S&W guy, have been for years, but i havent found an M&P trigger i like, yet. They`re just horrible. The performance center models are a little bit better, but NOT by very much. Personally, i think the M&P triggers are voted the worst trigger out there on the market, for a stryker fired gun. Sorry, just being honest. I do have a few M&P`s, but ALL of mine have had all their trigger components replaced.
And whats even worse, if you buy the PC CORE & ported models, the barrels are NOT fitted properly...super sloppy. Take the OEM barrels and throw them in the garbage, replace them with a APEX barrel & trigger kit, then you`ll have a sweet target gun. I own several glocks too, glock triggers are far superior over S&W by a long shot. But then again, i hate glock frames....they dont fit my hand like the M&P guns do, thats why i buy the M&P`s and spend the extra money to make them shoot decent. I hate having to buy guns, then have to mod them just to make them shoot...who needs or wants the added expense. I just dont understand why S&W dosent put the effort into making the M&P a better gun for what you have to spend. The craftsmanship is all over the place with S&W M&P`s, some barely halfway decent, some are just junk right out of the box.
First 9mm shield i bought, got 100 rounds thru it, POWWWWWWWW, there went the take down lever spring...popped right out of the frame and jammed in the slide rail. It locked the gun right up...!!!! So i fixed the gun and down the fuggin road it went. Once that trust is broken, it`ll never be right.