[JonM]

i dont personally see any benefit. i would rather have the 20 round mecgars

[all4guns]

Originally Posted by Grapevinebill

Thanks, that is an older 92FS I picked up used. It has no warnings and a straight dust cover. I think it dates to 1994. I recently added a rail and a Burris Fastfire optic site and it has become a really fun shooter.

Did you have to drill the slide to attach that rail?

[sniper762]

its not an m9 if its not "us property" marked on the frame..............just a beretta 92

[Grapevinebill]

@all4guns, the mount is added on in place of the original rear dovetail site and 2 screws in the back. It is not required but I did have the slide drilled and secured the mount with a third screw in the front. The nice thing about this slide is that it also serves as a rear site if the optic fails. You can see it at www.sight-mount.com/. I have no affiliation with the seller, just like the product.

[Nismo_GTR]

Here's my 92A1 and my 90-two airsoft =P

[jdm033056]

Glad you're likin it Grapevine. Here is my 96GSD also with a Sight Mount

[dalefan88]

Here's my two.

[Trooper7687]

If I can get my camera to work I'll get mine posted up

[Grapevinebill]

Very Nice JDM. I love the way the 96 looks here.

Glad you're likin it Grapevine. Here is my 96GSD also with a Sight Mount

[/QUOTE]

[JonM]

Originally Posted by sniper762

its not an m9 if its not "us property" marked on the frame..............just a beretta 92

actually it is. they are made on the exact same production line in every way. the government m9 gets a stamp "US Property" the civilian sales models do not since the government isnt owning them, thats the only difference. oh and the government guns dont get shipped with a nice hardcase. ill take the case and non-fed stamping.

the 92fs is a different gun than the m9a1 and the m9 is different than the m9a1. mostly its cosmetic but there are some subtle differences like checkering bevelled magwells and rails.

the 92fs and m9 arent the same thing.