Gunvault Speedsafe and biometric opinions?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Gear & Accessories > Gun Safes > Gunvault Speedsafe and biometric opinions?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2012, 04:33 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
miles_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bay Area,California
Posts: 17
Default Gunvault Speedsafe and biometric opinions?

I have a Gunvault bolted behind the headboard and it is a three second affair for me to contort a bit, push the buttons, and have my home defense revolver in hand. But my wife never seems to be able to manipulate the push buttons effectively or at least not in an amount of time that would be acceptable if necessary while I'm away on business.

So my question is if anyone has direct experience with the biometric Gunvault options, specifically the Mini or the newer Speedsafe biometric?

I realize these are not safes but simple lock boxes, so this isn't about fire proofing or even burglar proofing, just about quick access by my significant other.

__________________
miles_fan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 10-24-2012, 11:04 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FAS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 168
Liked 24 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default

It seems like inexpensive biometrics can be finicky. Works well for some and not very good for others. A lot of variables that can make a difference like sweat and dry or oily skin.
I think it's one of those things that if you are OK with having electronics then you just need to try it to make sure it reads her print reliably and that you can return it if not satisfied.

__________________

Glenn
FAS1SAFE

FAS1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2012, 02:36 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
miles_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bay Area,California
Posts: 17
Default

You're probably right. I will definitely test either extensively when I get it. The SpeedSafe newer case appears more ergonomic but less substantial. I will probably opt for the older Mini and then have her run it many times until we bolt it down.

__________________
miles_fan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 06:20 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JeffCooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Palm Harbor,Florida
Posts: 187
Likes Given: 4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miles_fan
You're probably right. I will definitely test either extensively when I get it. The SpeedSafe newer case appears more ergonomic but less substantial. I will probably opt for the older Mini and then have her run it many times until we bolt it down.
I have three Gunvault safes - one biometric, two push button jobs. Ive spoken to Gunvault a couple of times about the biometric. Here are my gripes:

1. It very rarely opens on the first try. Sometimes it takes 3-4 tries.
2. You cant turn off the beep. This a problem because for each try (see above), you push the button to light the reader...and it beeps when you do. 3-4 tries in and any intruder is going to come looking for the source. Bang, Im dead. Prolly my wife too. Not what I paid $250ish for.
3. The bio safe comes with a wall wart, but if you plug it in, you cant have a battery in. If you lose power, your done without a key. So I run on a battery. What a waste.
4. Less of a gripe and more of a best practice thing. When the thing finally opens, the door slams open and makes a lot of racket. You get used to catching with a finger.

I have the same safe with push buttons on my boat. Works first time every time. I can turn the beep off. No wall wart, but the batts last forever (two years so far. My favorite is my newest, which takes the place of my bio safe. It holds one pistol and mounts on the side of my night start. A couple of button pushes and Ive got my 1911 in my hand. Flick the safety, and a BG is goung to have a hole in him.

Anyway, if you need a small safe, get the combo type and save yourself a pile of dough. I continue to try to get Gunvault to take back the bio and ship me out even ONE combo safe in exchange. No dice at this time. I will keep trying.
__________________
Jeff Cooper
Palm Harbor, FL
Colt AR-15 CR6724
Built AR-15, 5.56 & .300 AAC Blackout tops
Yugoslavian AK-47
Remington 1100 Tactical Shotgun
Remington 1100 Shotgun
Crosman 760 pump gun <smirk>
M1 Garand .30-06
M1903 Springfield Sporter .30-06
Sig Sauer P250 Sub Compact 9mm
Sig Sauer TacOps 1911
JeffCooper is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2012, 02:37 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Albuquerque,New Mexico
Posts: 164
Liked 25 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

There is a measurement in identity verification, especially biometrics, called the "equal error rate" or EER. The EER is when false rejects are the same as false acceptances. Obviously, you want the lowest measurement possible as you don't want a false reject or a false acceptance.

For comparison - hand geometry readers and iris scanners run about a 0.004% EER. On a good day a fingerprint reader is about 5%. The more you set the device to eliminate false acceptances - the higher the reject rate for a valid fingerprint. So, if you set it to get the false acceptance to something like 0.1% - the false reject rate goes up to about 30%.

From what you're describing as having to try 3-4 times, the manufacturer has set the fingerprint read to template comparison threshold to favor a lower false acceptance rate - nothing you can do about that - it's the nature of fingerprint readers.

__________________
buckhorn_cortez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 01:45 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JeffCooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Palm Harbor,Florida
Posts: 187
Likes Given: 4

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckhorn_cortez
There is a measurement in identity verification, especially biometrics, called the "equal error rate" or EER. The EER is when false rejects are the same as false acceptances. Obviously, you want the lowest measurement possible as you don't want a false reject or a false acceptance.

For comparison - hand geometry readers and iris scanners run about a 0.004% EER. On a good day a fingerprint reader is about 5%. The more you set the device to eliminate false acceptances - the higher the reject rate for a valid fingerprint. So, if you set it to get the false acceptance to something like 0.1% - the false reject rate goes up to about 30%.

From what you're describing as having to try 3-4 times, the manufacturer has set the fingerprint read to template comparison threshold to favor a lower false acceptance rate - nothing you can do about that - it's the nature of fingerprint readers.
Excellent data. Thanks for sharing! (I just know GunVault hasnt gotten it right yet)
__________________
Jeff Cooper
Palm Harbor, FL
Colt AR-15 CR6724
Built AR-15, 5.56 & .300 AAC Blackout tops
Yugoslavian AK-47
Remington 1100 Tactical Shotgun
Remington 1100 Shotgun
Crosman 760 pump gun <smirk>
M1 Garand .30-06
M1903 Springfield Sporter .30-06
Sig Sauer P250 Sub Compact 9mm
Sig Sauer TacOps 1911
JeffCooper is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 03:09 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Albuquerque,New Mexico
Posts: 164
Liked 25 Times on 22 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

The latest development in finger scanners is to read the blood vessel pattern in the finger instead of making a template of the arches, loops, and whorls for a fingerprint. One of the problems with a fingerprint template is the size of the template required to make an accurate reading. The second problem is in the method of detecting the fingerprint. A number of methods have been tried, and none of them result in a low EER or reliable system as the condition of the platen itself (clean, dirty, dusty, etc.) influences the accuracy of the comparison against the template.

Is that a whorl or a piece of lint? You get the idea. The blood vessel pattern doesn't change and the template is far smaller. The problem is the technology requires an infrared light source to illuminate the blood vessel (blood reflects the IR light), and then you need a small camera to capture the image.

I'm sure, as with all technology, in 2-3 years if the technology proves popular, the manufacturers will contract for special solid state sensors to make the units smaller - but today, they rely on a camera instead of a dedicated sensor. While you can fit a camera into a cell phone, the IR sensitive image sensors are larger than the visible light sensors used in phones.

The manufacturers try to use commercially available hardware to keep costs down - which, in turn, drives the overall size of the current offerings in finger blood vessel detection devices.

__________________
buckhorn_cortez is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2012, 05:16 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: \
Posts: 990
Liked 133 Times on 108 Posts
Likes Given: 43

Default

Women use a lot more hand creams and skin conditioners than men. Her fingerprint changes as the oil is absorbed by the skin. Perhaps you just need another system that is more lady friendly. Oils naturally attract lint, just putting her hand on the bedspread is enough to change her fingerprint to an electronic reader.

__________________

"I do not aim with my hand; I aim with my eye. He who aims with his hand has forgotten the face of his father.
I do not shoot with my hand; I shoot with my mind. He who shoots with his hand has forgotten the face of his father.
I do not kill with my gun; I kill with my heart. He who kills with his gun has forgotten the face of his father."

Adopt a pet!! http://www.aspca.org/ Some of the finest pleasure horses come from here: http://www.canterusa.org/


Last edited by Old_Crow; 10-28-2012 at 05:19 AM.
Old_Crow is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2012, 06:01 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1
Default

I have biometric gun safe it works absolutely fine with me. I too have a similar experience, finger print recognition does not work properly for my wife. I thought the problem would be with be recognition system. Could anyone please produce some attachments regarding tips for maintaince.

__________________
security guard los angeles
georgetodhy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2012, 10:55 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
zombiehunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 126
Liked 20 Times on 12 Posts

Default

I have a gun vault. I wanted the combo one, but I just got the bio one instead. My wife and I have no problem with it reading for the most part but the issue is that it doesn't open every time. I can hear it unlock but the latch doesn't release the spring door every time.

I called gun vault and the guy told me to take a hammer and tap the latch part that is part of the door downward to bend it a little. I was kinda bummed that I had to take a hammer to it to get it to work properly. I did it and it worked for awhile and it started it again. I changed the battery out in it and it worked perfect for about two weeks and now back to the same thing. I've been meaning to call them but haven't got around to it yet.

Personally, I wouldn't buy it again.

__________________
zombiehunter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
GunVault MiniVault DLX 10% off rye_patch Sponsor Display 0 06-27-2011 10:19 PM
GunVault Biometric Safes rye_patch Sponsor Display 0 06-06-2011 01:47 AM
Biometric Safes durhamspringfield The Club House 2 03-28-2011 05:21 PM
Biometric gun safes mslater General Handgun Discussion 15 12-23-2010 01:51 AM
Biometric Handgun Safe Back40Bob Training & Safety 13 04-21-2009 03:47 PM