 |
|
02-26-2013, 02:17 PM
|
#21
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 307
Liked 144 Times on 83 Posts Likes Given: 13
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RUG3R44
I agree w/ DONN.
|
See message to Donn.
|
|
|
02-26-2013, 02:28 PM
|
#22
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lake Havasu,Arizona
Posts: 4,326
Liked 632 Times on 365 Posts Likes Given: 272
|
The typical aluminum frame officers model 1911 weighs 25 oz empty.
__________________
"I would not be an old man if I had not been an armed young man." JTJ
Patron Member NRA
"If you have always believed that everyone should play by the same rules and be judged by the same standards, that would have gotten you labeled as a radical 60 years ago, a liberal 30 years ago and a racist today"
Thomas Sowell
|
|
|
02-26-2013, 02:47 PM
|
#23
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 307
Liked 144 Times on 83 Posts Likes Given: 13
|
I will admit that there is one disadvanage to carrying a heavier weapon on one's belt -- when unbuckled in the restroom the belt and pants show an inclination to head south.
While disadvanges of wearing a belt holster have been discussed, not much has been said about the "belly band" type of holster. When worn over a t-shirt but under an outer shirt it is comfortable, but when I position the gun under my arm it is almost impossible to detect -- and I am 5'8" and 165 .
|
|
|
02-26-2013, 07:43 PM
|
#24
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 14
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by txpossum
I will admit that there is one disadvanage to carrying a heavier weapon on one's belt -- when unbuckled in the restroom the belt and pants show an inclination to head south.
While disadvanges of wearing a belt holster have been discussed, not much has been said about the "belly band" type of holster. When worn over a t-shirt but under an outer shirt it is comfortable, but when I position the gun under my arm it is almost impossible to detect -- and I am 5'8" and 165 .
|
I can end all your problems right now do what I do wear suspenders your shirt will cover it as long as you were T-shirt and nobody will ever know and when you going to the bathroom the pants do not move as long as you have a sturdy belt Take it for me I work with my weapon every single day
|
|
|
02-26-2013, 08:13 PM
|
#25
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alabama
Posts: 868
Liked 306 Times on 225 Posts Likes Given: 207
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txpossum
Why the emphasis on "lightweight" carry guns? I personally prefer carrying a weapon with a little heft.
I could carry just about any handgun I cared to, and I own many to choose from; however, my two carry companions for the last 15 years (that all alternating -- I don't carry two at the same time) have been either a full size 1911, or a .40 caliber Firestar, which was the first compact .40 caliber. Y'all all know the shape and size of a 1911; the Firestar is about the size of the Colt Officer's ACP that was my carry prior to switching to the Firestar. (Although different internally, the controls of the Firestar are the same as a 1911 -- a very underrated little gun, but that's another story).
I carry in either a IWB holster behind my hip, or, if more concealment is needed, in a "bellyband" under my shirt, without printing or discomfort; their weight and size is so unnoticeable that I frequently forget that I'm wearing them -- I'll have been home a couple of hours before I realize I haven't taken them off yet. (I'm an average sized person)
Why do I carry these guns instead of a smaller, lighter "concealment" gun?
1. Caliber. I like self defense calibers that start with a "4". The .380 used to be known as a "mousegun" (yes, I know advances in ammo has increased it's stopping power), and I've never been a fan of the 9mm (but let's not get into that discussion here).
2. Accuracy. Both of my carry guns are reasonably accurate up to 25 yards. (Yes, I know studies have shown that most gunfights occurs at less than 7 yards. My guns work just fine at this distance too.) Decent sight radius and you can get a good grip on 'em.
3. Control. I believe that the ability to re-acquire a target (or multiple targets) is an important aspect of a self defense firearm. With my carry guns the ability go get back on target quickly is not a problem, even when shooting one-handed.
So . . . why the preference for "little" guns?
|
Because you do not need a 'big' gun to do the job thanks to modern bullet performance!
__________________
An armed society is not always a polite society, but it is a free and safe society!
Self Defense is an absolute and natural right!
Keep your head down and your powder dry!
|
|
|
03-02-2013, 09:01 AM
|
#26
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gig Harbor,WA
Posts: 520
Liked 29 Times on 28 Posts Likes Given: 99
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by txpossum
Okay, but I still maintain that with the proper holster, it is just as easy to conceal a 1911 as it is a smaller gun.
|
Some people are unable to pjysically pick up a full size weapon (not me, i carry a 4" 357), so consider that. Everyone who is safe & sane should be able to defend themselves. You like a hefty weapon, that is your personal choice, dont beat upon someone elses. And besides, there are still plenty of hefty models being manufactured.
|
|
|
03-02-2013, 12:01 PM
|
#27
|
|
FAA licensed bugsmasher
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Davenport,IA
Posts: 5,024
Liked 710 Times on 445 Posts Likes Given: 142
|
Personally, I find pocket carry unnoticeable, so I keep my carry guns small.
I hate carrying on my waist. I find it very uncomfortable when sitting down, particularly in the car.
I've considered shoulder carry, but haven't sprung for a holster yet.
__________________
Scott
Quote:
|
If you're not representing Jesus in a way that makes people want to hang out with you, you're doing it wrong.
|
Quote:
|
Those who refuse to participate in politics shall be governed by their inferiors. -Plato
|
eduLaunchpad.com The next generation of college search & prep.
Regent Holdings What you need to know about silver, gold, and the economy.
|
|
|
03-02-2013, 12:26 PM
|
#28
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,493
Liked 69 Times on 65 Posts Likes Given: 3
|
Why a light weight guns?? Really, there easier to carry . Why weigh your self down with a heavy firearm if you can control a lighter version??
|
|
|
03-02-2013, 12:31 PM
|
#29
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dixie,US South
Posts: 107
Liked 8 Times on 4 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOSSFLY
Its just personal preferance -
|
Exactly!
I would prefer to carry a small light weight handgun,
But, much prefer shooting a heavier one if I had to!
|
|
|
03-02-2013, 12:49 PM
|
#30
|
|
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jacksonville,FL
Posts: 978
Liked 293 Times on 189 Posts Likes Given: 248
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StainlessSteel215
I understand your perspective on your justification for carrying bigger guns but its quite simple for most people who choose subcompact/small frame/lightweight guns: better conceal-ability.
|
I agree with you for the most part, but why do so many people prefer Airweight "J" frames over steel "J" frames? Unless it's in an ankle holster as a back up my S&W 360PD never gets out of the safe. By the same token my S&W Mod 60 sees regular use for a few reasons. I can shoot it better, I can reliably use lighter rounds, and I'm not having to regrip it after each shot.
__________________
Accidents don't just happen. They must be carelessly planned.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|