Kahr CW9 Kel-tec P11 Comparison?
OK, I am thrifty, but I am not so cheap that I want to risk my like on an inferior weapon, but neither do I want to spend frivolously for a primary carry gun. I have pretty much decided that my Ruger P95 and Colt King Cobra .357 magnum 2.5" are too thick (the Ruger) or too heavy (the Colt!) to be my primary CW, especially in the summer. The two guns I am looking at are DAO, light and concealable. The Kel-tec P11 has more capacity (double stack magazine) and is an inch thick and only 5.6 long (I found the PF9 grip too thin to get a good grip). The Kahr is a bit longer, but thinner, even so I can get a good grip on it. The more expensive Kahrs have a good rep, this one, the reviews seems more "mixed," the Kel-tec seems to be well regarded in its price range, but at $100-150 less than the Kahr, do you get what you pay for? Has any one done a side by side comparison on these? I'd appreciate your informed insights and thoughts.