Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection > interesting occurrence tonight

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-05-2013, 03:13 PM   #71
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 5,265
Liked 3684 Times on 1817 Posts
Likes Given: 1004

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apwvsd40ve View Post
agreed! I am working myself towards that now. After this discussion and some thinking on my part. This may be something that I make more common in my life. The only down-side to OC vs. CC here is that OC applies in public...but in an automobile, they rely on DNR laws...which means that without CC license...a handgun must be unloaded and locked in a case. Magazines can be loaded but cannot be with the firearm. makes OC slightly more difficult.
My State has the same conundrum... Of course, I've been a CCW guy for 17 years so I'm covered while OCing in our out of my vehicle.

Should a Cop see me exit my vehicle with my OC firearm, he would have "reasonable suspicion" of a crime and be justified in demanding my ID to see if I possessed a valid CCW... which I do.

Without the CCW, the OC person must remove and unload the sidearm before entering the vehicle to avoid running a fowl of Deputy Barney Fife.

Tack
__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 03:16 PM   #72
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
clr8ter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Central NH
Posts: 2,569
Liked 636 Times on 428 Posts
Likes Given: 386

Default

Maybe private security?

__________________
clr8ter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 03:18 PM   #73
Supporting Member
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Sniper03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,685
Liked 1797 Times on 921 Posts
Likes Given: 971

Default

I agree! If they were LEOs they would have their badges on! It is policy on all departments that I am aware of. If you weapon is showing your badge must be visible also. Wannabes! to me or some self proclaimed bounty hunters for a bonding service. Handcuffs ????????????

03

__________________

The Constitution is not an instrument for the Government to restrain the people. It is an instrument for the people to restrain the Government!
*Patrick Henry

Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom."

-- John F. Kennedy

Sniper03 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 03:19 PM   #74
62 gr Fusion
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Squawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 865
Liked 190 Times on 127 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tackleberry1

Squawk... I understand but my point is "who cares"... Judging others "legal activity" is the realm of "enlightened liberals" who think they look smart by questioning others "need" to do whatever it is there doing.

Libs use this tool to demonize...

Hunting. "Who needs to kill an animal when we have supermarkets?"
AR's. "Who needs a 30 round magazine?"
Christianity. "Who needs Christ when we have the Kardashians?"

Ect... Ect... Ect...

I think most gun owners consider themselves 2A advocates but advocacy is a learning process and far too often we fall for the same desire to sound smart by questioning need.

Tack
I get you Tack, and it is not about need in my view. I just don't see any reason for a civilian to walk around looking like Barney Fife. One pistol and spare mags I get and wholeheartedly support. I wish more people would OC.

The handcuffs is what gets me. That right there is just attention drawing. Period.
__________________

If guns kill people, mine are defective.

Squawk is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 03:40 PM   #75
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
eatmydust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 3,015
Liked 2166 Times on 1283 Posts
Likes Given: 1148

Default

We have touched on a bunch of issues in this thread and it is a very worthwhile conversation.

When it comes to OC v. CC, I like the idea of OC, which I do in the wilds, for ease of access, mainly for bear protection. I have had a few close encounters of the furry kind, including a sow with cubs, and a bear which was unwilling to give way. OC in the populace is a very good idea, as a way to desensitize people. Of course, it must be done with critical thought of your environment and discretion. Here in PA, I'd consider it in smaller, more rural towns but never in Philly or Pittsburgh.

As far as CC is concerned, of course this is my usual method. I feel that if the element of surprise is valued so highly by armed forces and LEOs around the world, I should deploy it as well.

My $.02.

__________________

Sent from my (_E=MC² _)

We do not choose our future, we choose our habits and our habits dictate our future. - anonymous

eatmydust is offline  
Tackleberry1 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 04:25 PM   #76
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
manta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK.
Posts: 1,115
Liked 255 Times on 181 Posts
Likes Given: 66

Default

Quote:
I understand the "tactical assumption" of your claim but I seriously doubt any thug would have the balls to engage openly armed victims.
There are examples here of the killers give police no chance because they knew they were armed. (open carrying )And were murders not knowing someone was armed saved his life and cost one of the killers theirs. Giving up the advantage of surprise by letting a possible attacker know you are armed doesn't make sense to me.
__________________
manta is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 04:44 PM   #77
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Tackleberry1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver,WA
Posts: 5,265
Liked 3684 Times on 1817 Posts
Likes Given: 1004

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manta View Post
There are examples here of the killers give police no chance because they knew they were armed. (open carrying )And were murders not knowing someone was armed saved his life and cost one of the killers theirs. Giving up the advantage of surprise by letting a possible attacker know you are armed doesn't make sense to me.
The component missing from ^^THIS^^ argument is "motive".

People who attack Uniformed Police are not the people who attack civilians. There is a well established track record of mass shooters retreating and taking there own life when faced with armed confrontation.

Given the IRA struggles in the UK over the decades I'm sure uniformed Cops have been assassinated...

This occasionally happens in the US as well but the "motive" factors are either "political" or "vengeance". These guys rarely have a beef with the populace.

Those who do target civilians for maximum body count and notoriety overwhelmingly choose "gun free zones" and almost exclusively seek to contol there own end by committing suicide at the first sign of resistance.

Should one of these guys pick a crowded Wal Mart over a school and happen to notice armed people in the building... I thing the stats would indicate a high probability of them going somewhere else.

More likely... they would charge in gun blazing and not ever recognize armed patrons until they took return fire.

Is there something to be said for "better safe than sorry?" Sure... But the advantage is constantly overstated without the data to support it.

Tack
__________________
Tackleberry1 is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 05:47 PM   #78
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
manta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK.
Posts: 1,115
Liked 255 Times on 181 Posts
Likes Given: 66

Default

Quote:
People who attack Uniformed Police are not the people who attack civilians. There is a well established track record of mass shooters retreating and taking there own life when faced with armed confrontation.
It is a bit different here but the same people that killed police officers killed more civilians than police. They also have made the mistake in the past of assuming that people have not being armed that saved the person's life. If they knew or thought you were armed then they never give the individual a chance to use it.

Quote:
Should one of these guys pick a crowded Wal Mart over a school and happen to notice armed people in the building... I thing the stats would indicate a high probability of them going somewhere else.
Possibly or they would walk up behind the person they see is armed and shoot them first. Knowing that people are likely to be armed but not knowing who they are could also be a deterrent.

PS. Then being able to carry open or concealed is better than not at all.
__________________
manta is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 11:32 PM   #79
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pasco Cty.FL
Posts: 6,199
Liked 2182 Times on 1251 Posts
Likes Given: 1766

Default

I want to OC occasionally at meets. I think it's

a great way to create positive public relations and

mainstream awareness.

But EDC is much better concealed, IMO.

Just my .02$.

__________________
therewolf is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
What you drinking tonight? Toll13 The Club House 31 11-24-2011 02:41 AM
Negligent Discharge. This is not a rare occurrence. Shihan Training & Safety 47 09-30-2010 08:25 PM
Tonight on Oreily user4 Politics, Religion and Controversy 13 06-25-2009 07:50 PM
Dinner Tonight gregs887 The Club House 38 05-04-2009 02:53 AM
Got Little Ones At The House Tonight? gorknoids The Club House 1 12-25-2008 12:27 AM