Immediately Post SHTF Question - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection > Immediately Post SHTF Question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-29-2011, 04:03 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ArizonaLawman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florence,AZ
Posts: 463
Liked 3 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigByrd47119 View Post
Wow, thanks for all the replies!

So allow me to refine a bit here.

1. I am CPR/ First-Aid certified
2. Would you personally feel a moral obligation to provide medical treatment to the best of your ability if the opportunity presented itself within the confines of this general scenario?
3. Any forseeable legal ramifications going either way?

I appreciate everyones input and advise. I am well awair of what is typically accepted protocol in these situations, which is why I thought this may be an interesting variable.
1. CPR on a sucking chest would...really not worth the effort in my opinion. You are into possibly contaminated blood (AIDS, HEP C, etc etc etc).

2. NO, I would definitely NOT feel morally obligated to render aid in this situation. Number one, YOU didn't create the situation. You reacted to a situation that was created by your assailant. YOU did not choose to shoot someone when you woke up this morning. You, I am assuming, chose to go about your day, doing as little damage long the way as you could. YOU shot to STOP a threat, you didn't shoot to KILL, or MAIM, or WOUND, or WARN. You were forced to engage in a defensive action to save your life. The choice was made when you were chosen as a victim, and the scumbag lost the bet. A first responder or a police officer has an obligation to render that aid which can be rendered (though in AZ an officer is NOT obligated to perform medical aid and in some departments is specifically prohibited from doing so unless it is in aid of another officer or first responder). The act of calling for medical assistance from 911 IS enough. You called the pros, your number one job is to survive.

3. Yes, there COULD be legal ramifications if you try to render aid and botch it in some way. If you do NOT render hands-on aid but call the professionals you have "Aided the attacker I was forced to shoot by calling professional help who is trained to deal with and who has experience in treating traumatic injury of this type."

Said another way "I have some very basic CPR and first aid knowledge, but I have no experience with this, and I believed anything I would do might make his/her injuries worse."

Or another way: "There was so much blood, and I didn't know if he has AIDS or some other blood borne pathogen, and I am not a medic, and not equipped to protect myself against that kind of threat as well."

You are under NO obligation to further risk your health, safety, or life in rendering aid to one who has forced you to defend yourself against.

All that being said....IF you can do so in COMPLETE safety, and I do mean COMPLETE safety...help out if you can. The compassionate part of my nature will still try to help. But the reality is, by calling 911 you HAVE rendered aid by calling the pros.

There is so much crap on the 'net posted by 'net commandos who know what they know about SD and post SD survival from snippets in magazines. What I know, I learned after 22+ years on the street carrying a badge. I learned sitting for endless hours in court rooms. I learned by endless hours of depositions, during lawsuits that are almost automatic in a use of force by an officer.

It's critical that you survive first. Secure the weapon. Ascertain the condition of witnesses, then call 911. Remember...part of surviving the incident is the post-critical-incident survival. How you handle the first interaction with responding officers will determine whether or not you ever get to court.
__________________
"If you take your hands off the back of my cruiser one more time...I will make your birth certificate a worthless document!"
ArizonaLawman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 09:43 AM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 701
Liked 181 Times on 102 Posts
Likes Given: 407

Default

Totally agreed. Although, when calling 911 and them finding out you shot someone in your home, outside ect,

It is recommended that you DO, or atleast that is what i would do. Last thing I need is for the police drawing on me, or the judge thinking I am a threat to the public if it ever does go that far.

Actually, 20 minutes after the incident, you can be in your bed sleeping with the AC on drinking a nice cold beer. Before all is said and done, you get a nice pat on the back!

Not saying you should give a sh*t about the bad guy.

__________________
Rarity is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 06:15 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ArizonaLawman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florence,AZ
Posts: 463
Liked 3 Times on 1 Posts

Default

A "violent and tumultous entry" into your home, I.e. a home invasion is by nature a violent act, and therefore deadly force IS immediately justified. One can reasonably assume at the moment your door crahes in, one is in IMMINENT DANGER OF DEATH OR GRAVE BODILY HARML
". You need not see a weapon to believe you are in danger. In AZ you have zero obligation to retreat or escape, especially in your own home and its curtilage. So, you are correct about being done and over with on scene. It WILL take longer than 20 minutes...but you can expect not to have to go "downtown".


If one actually follows the trends in crime stats...home invasions lead to violent assault/rape/murder or attempted murder in incredibly high percentages. A reasonable person would be a fool to believe that a home invasion is NOT a situation where lethal force is not justified and correct.

Even here in the country, I keep my doors locked at all times. I am always armed (yes, even in my home) and answer the door with my SD firearm handy. After dark, especially, it is in my hand (though discreetly behind my back) if I am not expecting visitors.

My daughter doesn't answer the door. Our two landsharks are always there first at any rate. My house isn't one that would make an attractive target anyway...but who says scumbags are smart.

__________________
"If you take your hands off the back of my cruiser one more time...I will make your birth certificate a worthless document!"
ArizonaLawman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 06:53 PM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
MrWray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,372
Liked 1000 Times on 598 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

I agree with u 100% arizonalawman, i spent from 2000 to 2009 as a lawman myself. Ive been on 2 different special response teams and consider myself pretty well trained. Ive noticed that our awareness skills are more honed in than other peoples because of the way we are trained as well as the things we do in the field. Not saying that other people are stupid, just my awareness zone always stays in the orange on a regular basis. If im at home and my door gets kicked in im not waiting to see who it is first,wonder why they are there, or even care if they are inside or just standing at the door threshold. They will have a bad day needless to say

__________________

Semper paratus.....virtute et armis

MrWray is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2011, 01:10 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania
Posts: 346
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pagj17
If I've shot the guy and he's still breathing, I'll provide the medical attention that I can. If they're dead they'll have to stay that way though.
Excellent point. Can't fix dead.
__________________
97cobra is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2011, 12:41 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ArizonaLawman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florence,AZ
Posts: 463
Liked 3 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWray View Post
I agree with u 100% arizonalawman, i spent from 2000 to 2009 as a lawman myself. Ive been on 2 different special response teams and consider myself pretty well trained. Ive noticed that our awareness skills are more honed in than other peoples because of the way we are trained as well as the things we do in the field. Not saying that other people are stupid, just my awareness zone always stays in the orange on a regular basis. If im at home and my door gets kicked in im not waiting to see who it is first,wonder why they are there, or even care if they are inside or just standing at the door threshold. They will have a bad day needless to say
I have sought training from the best on my own dime, as well as having been a trainer for over 15 years. Yet...I still don't claim to be an "expert". I leave the claims of being an expert to the dime store commandos, and self promoting trainers, and range monkeys. What I DO claim to know is that I survived 22 years carrying a badge, working narcotics, gangs, homicide, and robbery details, as well as a brief stint in my wasted youth as a SWAT officer. I have to have SOMETHING on the ball, and something to offer.

When I make an observation, or lay out an opinion, it isn't the culmination of all the articles I have read in "Whaterver Gun Rag Of The Month". It is what I learned from all those years on the street, in court, watching autopsies, investigating homicides, filling body bags with dead hood rats and gang bangers who died of terminal stupid, and from older, wiser, more street savvy cops than myself. I was an FTO raising baby cops to adulthood trying to teach them all they would need to make it home alive every night in a compressed 45-60 day rotation with me on the night shift. "Super, I am glad you learned all that cool stuff in the academy, now let me show you what you need to know on the street." was my standard answer to "Gee Sarge, they said in the academy that ____________."

So, yeah, I kow what you're getting at. If the was ONE thing that I could get across to folks who carry is how to OPEN YOUR EYES. See all that is around you. I mean, "see" it so you could testify about it. Once you start to see things in that fashion, you are damned difficult to surprise.

The door splintering in on your home is NOT a time for deep reflection on whether or not you need a new door, or if the wind is a-blowin'. It's time for you to be on target on high center chest on the first scumbag through that splintered door.

Also...folks...you NEED to make a plan in your home. Wargame the heck out of it. Look for all those places where YOU could hide if you were a nasty old burglar. Wait until everyone is alseep in your house, then walk through it. Get a feel for every sound the house makes. Every noise that should be there. Look for shadows where a boogie man can hide.

Practice slicing the pie with a training gun or even your fingers like we did when we were kids. Learn how to move through your house. I can tell you, as a cop, I HATED clearing a structure. I did it, but man, it SUCKS like a big lollipop...you don't know where everything is, and you are trying to find Mr. Bad Guy. It's nice in the days of well trained landsharks and K9 teams....I am all for letting the dog go in first. Because I can't tell you how many times I would up with the hole in the end of the gun thing pointed at ME by a brother officer. It happens.

Damn....too much coffee...I just got all wordy again.
__________________
"If you take your hands off the back of my cruiser one more time...I will make your birth certificate a worthless document!"
ArizonaLawman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2011, 07:35 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Gh0zt36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Micco,Florida
Posts: 1,472
Liked 259 Times on 179 Posts
Likes Given: 366

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c3shooter View Post
Robo ia absolutely X ring in this one. As far as the "make sure he is dead" school of thought, once the threat has passed, further actions that you take will be viewed in a different light- by a jury.

Ask the pharmacist that reloaded and shot the unconcious robber lying on the floor.
Thats against everything I was taught in CCW class. they taught my class to
" shoot to stop the threat " If that means shoot the perp in the shooting side shoulder and then disarm him if possible then thats what you do. We were taught killing someone is THE last thing you should do unless you feel its your only option. was my instructor wrong?
__________________

" Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. " - Benjamin Franklin

Gh0zt36 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 01:05 AM   #18
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
armsmaster270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sacramento,CA
Posts: 753
Liked 141 Times on 91 Posts
Likes Given: 156

Default

The one on duty shooting I was involved in I immediately called for an ambulance and assistance moved his weapon out of his reach. cuffed him behind his back, felt his carotoid for pulse, none found, waited for the cavalry to arrive. Preserved the scene.

__________________
https://sites.google.com/a/armsmaster.net/www/
http://s239.photobucket.com/albums/ff207/armsmaster270/

http://militarysignatures.com/signat...ember14888.png
Retired LE, M.P., Sr. M.P. Investigator, armorer, F.B.I. Trained Rangemaster/Firearms Instructor , Presently Forensic Document Examiner for D.H.S.
armsmaster270 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 01:35 AM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ArizonaLawman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Florence,AZ
Posts: 463
Liked 3 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by armsmaster270 View Post
The one on duty shooting I was involved in I immediately called for an ambulance and assistance moved his weapon out of his reach. cuffed him behind his back, felt his carotoid for pulse, none found, waited for the cavalry to arrive. Preserved the scene.
Perfectly executed. We were also trained to restrain. As an officer, you will have cuffs. As an armed civilian...chances are you won't. I still carry a set of cuffs in my "go everywhere bag"...and I am guessing you do too.

As for the CCW instructor who advocated shooting the gun arm and disarming the subject...he ought to have his cert pulled. What asshattery. All he's doing is telling people to get killed or sued. If a lethal shot is not justified, a warning shot or "shot to wound" certainly is not justified and may very well be considered attempted murder or assault with a deadly weapon.

"So, Mr. Jones...you fired a shot at your alleged attacker to wound him? Mr. Jones, I would assert to the court that if you were only shooting to wound, you didn't really believe you were in mortal danger. You weren't were you?"

And so it would go with a DA looking for a political notch on his belt.
__________________
"If you take your hands off the back of my cruiser one more time...I will make your birth certificate a worthless document!"
ArizonaLawman is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2011, 05:53 AM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Gh0zt36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Micco,Florida
Posts: 1,472
Liked 259 Times on 179 Posts
Likes Given: 366

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArizonaLawman View Post
Perfectly executed. We were also trained to restrain. As an officer, you will have cuffs. As an armed civilian...chances are you won't. I still carry a set of cuffs in my "go everywhere bag"...and I am guessing you do too.

As for the CCW instructor who advocated shooting the gun arm and disarming the subject...he ought to have his cert pulled. What asshattery. All he's doing is telling people to get killed or sued. If a lethal shot is not justified, a warning shot or "shot to wound" certainly is not justified and may very well be considered attempted murder or assault with a deadly weapon.

"So, Mr. Jones...you fired a shot at your alleged attacker to wound him? Mr. Jones, I would assert to the court that if you were only shooting to wound, you didn't really believe you were in mortal danger. You weren't were you?"

And so it would go with a DA looking for a political notch on his belt.
Interesting point of view.. see , it's really a shame there isn't a standardized CCW class instead of just different instructors points of view. cause at the time his point sounded solid. which was you want to stop the assault only because you wouldn't want to have been seen as using excessive force if there was anyway you could have just stopped the perp's assault. but you as well raise a good point with you're above statement. These two arguements are exactly why there should be a standardized class.

I mean my instructor was former law enforcement as well and if 2 leos have such an oposing view. what chance do I have in court?
__________________

" Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. " - Benjamin Franklin

Gh0zt36 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
1st Post,New Here .22 Phoenix Arms Question Matt Williams General Handgun Discussion 4 09-26-2011 10:33 PM
We Want THIS Show Cancelled Immediately if Not Sooner Dillinger The Club House 70 09-10-2011 12:25 PM
NRA: Act Immediately to Block ATF Long Gun Sales Reporting! USEBOTHHANDS Legal and Activism 0 02-11-2011 04:08 PM
Newbe question on reloading 40 S&W (Sorry it's a long post) fireman091 Ammunition & Reloading 19 12-01-2010 01:15 AM