Some of us "gun nuts" were standing around Sat. when a "Bostonian" accented gentleman stated emphatically that he did not even own a gun. One of the fellows asked him how he had lived so long and if he loved his family. Ticked the guy off and he stomped away---the rest of us just chuckled at the idiot.
People like that guy should have to pay higher local taxes to cover their "police protection".
Is it better to do the right thing for the wrong reason, or to do the wrong thing for the right reason? If you do the wrong thing for the right reason, is it still the wrong thing?
Si vis pacem para bellum.
There are two ways of doing something. Right and again.