Warning potential caliber war
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > Warning potential caliber war

View Poll Results: Which one:
357 MAG 34 72.34%
44 SPL 13 27.66%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2011, 06:41 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mesinge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,535
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default Warning potential caliber war

I often carry my S&W 3" 44 magnum model 629. And for the sake of recoil control and rapidity of rounds fired I often carry it with the new 44 SPL Critical Defense load from Hornady. I also often carry my 2 3/4" Security Six with 158 grain Fiocchi XTP loads.
I began wondering about the difference between these loads based on the shorter barrel lengths and the relatively light 44 SPL bullet weight.
So I did some testing with my chrony (average of 10 rounds).

The Critical defense round clocked in a 165 grain 44 SPL round traveling at 915fps from the 3" barrel and the Fiocchi 158 grain 357 mag round clocked in at 1178 from the 2 3/4" barrel.

The bullet weights are very close. The velocity edge goes to the 357, but the diameter of the round goes to the 44 SPL. I just wish I had gelatin blocks to test expansion of the two rounds.

So, based on this data and ignoring weapon size.

What's your opinion?

Which is "better" ?


P.S. I used the word better loosely for the lack of a more suitable word.
.

__________________
www.pistol-talk.com

The only 357 magnum to me is the Ruger Security Six!!

Last edited by mesinge2; 04-17-2011 at 08:36 PM.
mesinge2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 04-17-2011, 07:37 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
doctherock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rainy sh!thole,Oregon
Posts: 5,148
Liked 11 Times on 10 Posts

Default

I've always preferred the .357 magnum: however, I have shot the .44 very little.

__________________

DON'T BUY DELL!!!!!

BEWARE!!! The toes you step on today may be connected to the ass you kiss tomorrow.

PM Tango about his upcoming SHARTFOO courses.

doctherock is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 07:47 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lakeview,Or
Posts: 9
Default

I like the thump of a 300 gr. .429 coming out of my .44 mag.Not too viable for a carry gun but it shure puts a hurt on stuff.

__________________

Earth first,we'll log the other planets later.

chainsaw is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 08:22 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,323
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

Default

Personally I would rather carry the Security Six with 125 HPs. Certainly nothing wrong with the .44 sp though, it starts out halfway to what you're trying to get the .357 to expand to.

__________________
freefall is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 09:13 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1422 Times on 808 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

357 mag for carry.

Why carry the extra gun when the smaller frame will do as good?

__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 09:19 PM   #6
Retired
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
danf_fl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: LA (Lower Alabama),FL
Posts: 10,412
Liked 2986 Times on 1720 Posts
Likes Given: 1280

Default

On what you have presented, I went with the .44 only for the manufacturer's name.
Under different conditions (like the same manf name for both), I would go with the .357 ala Mr canebrake.

__________________

Amendment II:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Life Member NRA
Life Member NAHC
Former President of the ECPT (Eifel Combat Pistol Team)

danf_fl is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 10:46 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mesinge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,535
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canebrake View Post
357 mag for carry.

Why carry the extra gun when the smaller frame will do as good?
The 44 (41oz) is about the same size and weight as a 1911 (38oz); although it is much thicker:

__________________
www.pistol-talk.com

The only 357 magnum to me is the Ruger Security Six!!
mesinge2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 01:55 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Prince Frederick,Maryland
Posts: 218
Liked 15 Times on 11 Posts

Default

I live in a state where concealed carry is for all intents and purposes, impossible. I am a big guy, but I don’t think I would carry an N frame Smith as a concealed carry piece in any caliber. If I wanted to carry a 3” gun, it would probably be either my 3” Model 60 Pro or SP101. The bulk of an N frame is a nonstarter for me.

While I tend to feel that “real” guns begin with .40 caliber, I am not sure it makes much difference what the size of the hole in the barrel is. Ammo in important, in any caliber, but shot placement is more important.

__________________
Clem is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 02:51 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mesinge2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,535
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

The gun is quite accurate. Here is a group I shot with 300 grain 44 Mag loads, It is 100 times easier to group even tighter groups with the lighter loads! Pay atention to the recoil and understand why I like the Special loads for this 3" monster,

__________________
www.pistol-talk.com

The only 357 magnum to me is the Ruger Security Six!!
mesinge2 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 03:27 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
masterPsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Barstow area, Kalifornia
Posts: 1,347
Liked 89 Times on 67 Posts
Likes Given: 25

Default

I also prefer the .44sp over the .357 mag for carry. Recoil is very manageable in the N frame Smith whereas the .357s sharp bark is hard for many people to handle with quick follow-up shots, even in an L frame Smith. JMHO.

Jim......

__________________
Dosn't matter what day of the week it is, the best day is the day with your finger on the trigger--jra

Visit me on FaceBook at Alvord Limited Custom Gunsmithing.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Alvord-Limited-Custom-gunsmithing/637828296334671?ref=bookmarks
masterPsmith is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
potential millionaire? powg The Club House 8 01-05-2011 02:59 PM
Health Warning! AusLach The Club House 25 08-20-2010 03:43 AM
WARNING: DO NOT USE OpticSale.com!!! DrGonzo11 Optics & Mounts 8 08-17-2010 06:50 PM
Warning from the CDC. Jo da Plumbr The Club House 5 02-17-2010 09:11 PM
Let this be a warning! zhuk Politics, Religion and Controversy 8 08-27-2009 09:11 AM