Smith & Wesson 642 finish
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > Smith & Wesson 642 finish

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2010, 03:22 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Default Smith & Wesson 642 finish

My wife wants to get a S&W 642 snubby and she really likes the one with the black finish because it's not as "flashy". My question is how durable is the finish. It will probably spend most of it's life in a purse so some scratches are expected, but will the black scratch off easily. My thought is that the stainless steel finish will be much more durable.

__________________
wcollier75 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-21-2010, 06:37 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,014
Liked 35 Times on 28 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

The frame on the 642's are an alloy and not stainless steel. I do agree that the matte black finish will show scratches easier than the matte silver.

Either way, your going for function and not appearence (I hope).

__________________
TheOldMan is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2010, 09:56 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Default

I've always been one to prefer function over appearance, but -and ladies please don't get me wrong- women often times put appearance pretty high up on the list. I just don't want to have to buy another one in a couple of years because "this one's all scratched up": If she doesn't notice the scratches, it will probably stay in her purse longer.

__________________
wcollier75 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 10:33 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Have her pick the one she likes and stick it in a Desantis Nemesis pocket holster to "protect it" (and keep the trigger covered) in her purse. I have had both the 442 and the 642 and find them about equally durable. Currently have a 642 and it doesn't show the scratches an EDC gun gets quite as much as my 442 did, but I don't really care; it's a carry piece. I have a dressed up PPK/S replete with lots of bling for BBQ's and Weddings.

__________________
druryj is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2010, 05:42 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks, good to know. I'll look into the pocket holster. My wife wants a purse with a built in gun pocket but Coach doesn't make any yet (tongue in cheek). I gotta tell you though, I get frustrated with the way S & W assigns model numbers to their guns. It is so confusing. For what ever reason, I thought the 442 was their super light model 340 (I think?) scandium j-frame. There nice guns, but the 3 oz weight difference just isn't worth the price difference. Maybe I'm just cheap. Anyway, thanks for the reply

__________________
wcollier75 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
smith&wesson jamo Revolver Handguns 5 08-17-2009 02:09 AM
Smith & Wesson M&P .40 liv2hnt460 Semi-Auto Handguns 6 08-08-2009 03:30 PM
Smith Wesson lasherb1 1911 Forum 1 11-06-2008 12:47 AM