 |
|
01-13-2012, 04:16 PM | #11 | Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 5 |
I don't mean to confuse you...I meant recoil of my load of 1050fps w/450gr cast is easier to shoot than the factory loaded 44 mag....Just so you know the 500 with full house DoubleTap,BuffaloBore,etc. is quite intense, to put it mildly
But this is the idea:, to be able to have enough power to penitrate a griz lengthwise and still have a chance to break his hips down on the way out, in case you missed his head on the way in. In order to do this, you need a heavy, hard, bullet. So the best way to move a heavier bullet with some amount of "control" we need a bigger gun. With the bigger caliber ( and case capacity) we can move a bigger bullet easier. Last edited by freedom475; 01-13-2012 at 04:33 PM. |
|
 |
02-08-2012, 06:42 PM | #12 | Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Horseshoe Bend, ID Posts: 3 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by smedori
Hunting a S&W .460 with 2 3/4" barrel for a trip to Alaska's backwoods. Does anyone know where I can buy one new or used?
|
I have a NIB S&W .460 in 2.75" and 5". Either one is $1400. |
|
 |
02-08-2012, 06:52 PM | #13 | Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Horseshoe Bend, ID Posts: 3 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by smedori
Also, any thoughts as to this revolver vs. the Ruger Super Red Hawk Alaskan .454 also with very short barrel and the Taurus Raging Bull .454 also with very short barrel for use in Alaska for large animal protection?
|
I like the ability of the .460 to shoot - .45 Schofield, .45 Long Colt, .45 Long Colt shot shells, .454 Casull, .460 S&W and many of the .410 2.5" slugs/buck/shotshells. |
|
 |
02-09-2012, 05:06 AM | #14 | Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 156 |
Shot a 329 with hot 265's. Whip was FAST and fairly large, so shot recovery aint super quick 
Recoil was OK though (but am used to .44 mags hot and N frames fit my hands well).
It had the wood grips on it, when i get mine I'll go Hogue rubber. |
|
 |
02-09-2012, 05:37 AM | #15 | Join Date: May 2011 Location: Traverse City, MI Posts: 152 |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hookeye
Shot a 329 with hot 265's. Whip was FAST and fairly large, so shot recovery aint super quick 
Recoil was OK though (but am used to .44 mags hot and N frames fit my hands well).
It had the wood grips on it, when i get mine I'll go Hogue rubber.
|
You can get replacement grips that were designed for the S&W 500 directly from S&W.
They have a mushy texture where grips hit the web of your hand. |
|
 |
02-10-2012, 11:00 PM | #16 | Supporting Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: , Wyoming Posts: 446 |
__________________ Freedom has a special sweetness for those who have defended it that those who haven't will never know. |
|
 |
02-12-2012, 11:04 PM | #17 | Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 3 | 
Thanks again to all who replied. For economic and other reasons I purchased a Taurus Raging Bull .454 with 2 1/4 inch barrel. [I would have gotten the Ruger .454 Alaskan but, 1) I couldn't find one since apparently the folks up in Alaska buy about as many as are produced and, 2) The short Ruger is not ported and maybe the ported barrel on the Taurus will lessen recoil a bit without sacrificing too much in terms of power]
Let me quickly point out that, although a neophyte when it comes to firearms, I understand that longer barrels are better in terms of power, accuracy and probably other things. For my use however, a longer barrel would be uncomfortable when hiking, backpacking, fishing etc. and therefore I would be more likely to leave it in the vehicle or at home and I think everyone agrees that having an excellent weapon safely locked up at home or in the vehicle is not as good as having a pretty darn good one where you need it.
As for caliber, I now better understand that bigger is better but, in my case, wanting to use the revolver for enjoyable target shooting as well as self protection, pointed me in the direction of the smaller, lower recoil caliber.
Hopefully I'll never have to fire it in self defense but, if I do, maybe, just maybe the .454 Casul out of that short barrel will be enough to get the job done. If I do use it on my 3 weeks in Alaska trip I will tell the tale on this site assuming I survive well enough to blog........ |
|
 |
02-12-2012, 11:16 PM | #18 | Supporting Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 474 |
Ive fired a ported 2-3/4" .460 and the shock isnt the recoil, its the blast of wind that blows your hair back  . The ported 454 should handle just fine and still have decent accuracy out to 80+ yds __________________ You can have it fast, cheap and accurate...pick any two. |
|
 |
02-12-2012, 11:19 PM | #19 | Supporting Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 2,021 Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cattledog
Ive fired a ported 2-3/4" .460 and the shock isnt the recoil, its the blast of wind that blows your hair back  . The ported 454 should handle just fine and still have decent accuracy out to 80+ yds
|
80yds, wow, thats some shooting with a snubby. __________________ NEVER FORGET |
|
 |
03-02-2012, 07:24 PM | #20 | Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 4 |
Having shot a 3" Model 29 (K rd butt with a N frame) with full house 240 gr, I cannot imagine a 454 or a 500 in the 3" ... Just in case you were wondering, I have a 12" TC in 45-70 that is not a problem, the 1" bull barrel does wonders |
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
|