Short Barrels/Long Barrels,I can't make up my mind
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > Short Barrels/Long Barrels,I can't make up my mind

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2009, 09:31 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ninjatoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Near Saginaw,Michigan
Posts: 1,498
Liked 176 Times on 131 Posts
Likes Given: 44

Default Short Barrels/Long Barrels,I can't make up my mind

I just got into handguns less than a year ago,and I immediatly purchased a snub nose Rossi .357,and I don't carry,and have no reason to have such a short barreled gun,since it's for home defense only.I liked the way snubs looked I guess,but as time goes on,I am getting fed up with my snubs' shortcommings.It has non adjustable sights,a tiny sight plane which I can't hit anything with,and as cool as .357 magnum sounds,it really isn't anything but a glorified .38,ballistically,frame size,durability wise.I have been thinking about it,and I think I want a full sized .357,something that has like a 6" barrel and is a "true" .357.I have had my eyes on the Ruger gp100,but haven't ruled out other guns also.What should I get?Should I limit myself to a .357,or maybe I could go with something else,I think .357 because ammo is cheap and it will get the job done,but I think I might try hunting whitetail with it too,so maybe I need a bigger caliber?Or in such a long barreled .357,will a .357 take whitetail,and will it do all the jobs I need it for,Home defense,plinking cheaply,possible hunting?

__________________
ninjatoth is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 10-13-2009, 01:45 AM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 16,706
Liked 8868 Times on 3841 Posts
Likes Given: 1383

Default

Yes, a .357 CAN take Eastern Whitetail (for all of you Westerners about to shout HERESY!- Eastern deer are a LOT smaller) However- my .357 has a 10 inch bbl, HEAVY handloads, and shoots more like a carbine. A .44 Mag would be much better choice for deer.

Another advantage of a longer barrel- longer ejection rod. The stubby little ejector on my 2" revolvers does not push far enough to completely remove fired cases.

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 01:59 AM   #3
WDB
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
WDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nonya,WA
Posts: 3,991
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Take a look at the S&W 586 or 686, well made and good sights.

__________________

Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benning Boy View Post
If you're really bored, I'm your huckleberry. If you really want a challenge, I'm the one.

If you're really smart, you'll just peddle your paint.
WDB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 02:53 AM   #4
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

You won't go wrong with either the S&W 586/686 or a a 6" Ruger GP100. In .44 magnum, either a Ruger Redhawk or a S&W model 29/629 will get the job done for you.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:00 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
diggsbakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pueblo,Colorado
Posts: 1,680
Liked 8 Times on 5 Posts

Default

I agree with the the notion of a .44 mag if it is to be used as a mountain gun. While a .357 might have the capability of taking a whitetail, (I understand they are about half the size of the mule deer we have here) the .44 mag is what I take camping in the case of a bear encounter.

I would never kill a bear (or deer) unless I had to and would feel terrible if I did like this guy:

Bear shot inside west-side home | bear, way, yama****a - Top Stories - Colorado Springs Gazette, CO

This was only a 100 lb black bear and he had to shoot it 4x w/ a .45 to kill it. The poor man felt like sh*t. This happens about on a weekly basis (at least) here in Southern Colorado during the hotter months. I don't know if there's bear attacks/encounters where you're from, but it's something to think about. The .41 Rem Mag is also reliable enough for protection.

__________________
diggsbakes is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:13 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ninjatoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Near Saginaw,Michigan
Posts: 1,498
Liked 176 Times on 131 Posts
Likes Given: 44

Default

There really are no bears where I am.It isn't unheard of to hear of a blackbear sighting every couple of years here,but I have never personally seen one in my lifetime around where I live,and i'm 29.I would like a .44 magnum,but I think that a .357 is the way i'm going to go.I am not a huge hunter,and I like to go target practice quite a bit,so a .357 is good,since I can get .38s or .357 ammo for 15-20 bucks for 50 around here.

__________________
ninjatoth is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 07:30 PM   #7
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
utf59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange Park,FL
Posts: 671
Liked 42 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 53

Default

I think .357 is a good choice. You can practice with .38 special (cheaper). And for whatever need you have, you can find a load for it (.38 sp., +p, +p+, .357 mag).

As for hunting, that's what the .357 magnum was designed for. And I don't know about your neck of the woods, but around here, .38 special and .357 are easier to find (at reasonable prices) than .44 mag.

__________________

"An armed society is a polite society." — Robert A. Heinlein

"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military."
— William S. Burroughs

utf59 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:59 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
OC357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 482
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

For hunting deer as you asked, .357 is minimum and .44 mag is better. Longer barrels would be better. So a .44 mag in a 6" absolute minimum barrel length would be a good pick I would think.

Just my opinion on your question.

OC

__________________

"magbum"

OC357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2009, 02:21 AM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
diggsbakes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pueblo,Colorado
Posts: 1,680
Liked 8 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Amen to the .44 mag (or .41 mag) being the minimum for hunting, especially if you are doing so w/ a revolver. I'd feel like a huge pile of sh*t if I shot a deer with a poor shot or a insufficient round and he/she still had enough adrenaline to get away, only for long enough to suffer for days or weeks before death.

Hunting with a revolver requires quite a bit of skill and familiarity w/ that type of firearm and it doesn't sound like you have that from your post. I'm not being judgmental, however it would be irresponsible to attempt to take any life with out purpose or skill. It would also be terrible to for a white tail to find out the hard way that a .357 couldn't take him/her down.

So if you are using a .357 for cheap, fun practice and self defense then that's a great choice, but if using a revolver to hunt, get a .44 or .41 mag (at least), possibly w/ a scope and spend hours (or days) and hundreds of rounds (and dollars) practicing for the ritual of killing an animal to ensure you have enough skill to make a kill with one shot, if given the opportunity.

D

__________________
diggsbakes is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:59 AM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 191
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Get a Dan Wesson M15-2 Pistol Pak. You'll have your choice of barrel lengths and 10" barrels are still available from CZ Arms. Forget a scope. At handgun ranges for someone relatively new, a dot sight is better.
Despite rumors to the contrary, the .357 Magnum is perfectly functional as a hunting caliber. A larger caliber cannot make up for lack of shooting ability. Practice, practice, practice, and the .357 is less expensive to practice with. The furthest distance you can put every shot into a 4" circle is your maximum range...don't exceed it. All of these .357 Magnum factory loads are capable of taking whitetail.
Buffalo Bore 158gr JHC:
Heavy 357 Magnum Pistol & Handgun Ammunition
Buffalo Bore 180gr WLN-GC:
Heavy 357 Magnum Pistol & Handgun Ammunition
Double Tap 180gr WLN-GC:
DoubleTap Ammunition
Double Tap 200gr WFN-GC:
DoubleTap Ammunition

__________________

Last edited by crossfire; 10-23-2009 at 08:02 AM.
crossfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
barrels in Canada CanGuy General Rifle Discussion 0 03-30-2009 04:41 PM
am barrels sgtdeath66 .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 7 01-01-2009 11:25 PM
10/22 Barrels notdku .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 14 07-07-2008 12:05 AM
Differnce in Barrels Hcannon XD Forum 1 10-15-2007 09:47 PM



Newest Threads