S&W 686 or Ruger GP100? - Page 7
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > S&W 686 or Ruger GP100?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-12-2012, 01:20 AM   #61
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
HOSSFLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lufkin,Tx
Posts: 6,932
Liked 2179 Times on 1470 Posts
Likes Given: 1191

Default

If money is not a issue----Flip a coin

__________________

Texan By Birth & Choice
USMC/VIET NAM VET

HOSSFLY is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2012, 01:26 AM   #62
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 139
Liked 25 Times on 20 Posts

Default

It all a matter of personal preference. They're both outstanding guns. Regardless of cost, I prefer the GP100. My brother prefers the 686. Is the 686 worth the extra bucks? Not to me. But it was to him, because he "preferred it".

Don <><

__________________

John 14:6 I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

genesis is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 06:07 PM   #63
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona,Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Liked 157 Times on 108 Posts
Likes Given: 119

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mongoose90 View Post
Here is my S & W 686 6 inch. Love this and will never part with it since my Dad gave it to me. It is a 1984 model.
This is my 1984, 6" Model 686, along with the 2 1/2" I purchased shortly after. My wife gave me the 6" as a gift. It was the first gun she ever bought me shortly after we met.

__________________
billt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 09:26 PM   #64
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
3spur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 98
Default

I just got my GP100 about a month ago and I love it, my husband and I both can't say anything bad about it. I like shooting it with .38 almost no recoil, does have a long trigger pull but gives me time to aim, lol

__________________
3spur is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 02:48 AM   #65
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
johnbrowning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 400
Liked 124 Times on 99 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

I had a 586 with trigger work nice piece. I need a new 357 to use so I don't mess up my Colts. Thinking GP100 or 586-686. When did Smith change their manf. process
Also looking at Colt Trooper non-MK III.

__________________
johnbrowning is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 03:05 AM   #66
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gig Harbor,WA
Posts: 825
Liked 104 Times on 87 Posts
Likes Given: 219

Default

I can help the op out, one word: yes. (Unless your spouse would beat you with them )

__________________
phildenton is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 03:30 AM   #67
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
firedawg60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 365
Liked 32 Times on 26 Posts
Likes Given: 115

Default

Well I just got me a "new to me" 686-2, 4". Well, it's on lay a way.

__________________
firedawg60 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 04:20 PM   #68
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mag318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 355
Liked 57 Times on 44 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I prefer the 686, both are decent revolvers but to me the 686 is a classic. If you shop around you can find an older prelock example for a decent price. Both companies still make serviceable revolvers but they are not the same quality as the older ones. I was at a LGS yesterday and bought a beautiful 686-3 for $450, and at that price I couldn't pass it up. The older prelock ones still have forged steel triggers and hammers and will last a lifetime, probably several.
Here's a photo of my CS1 version that I used as a duty revolver for years. These CS1s are now highly sought after by collectors and knowledgeable shooters alike. I wish I would have bought a couple more when I could have.

dsc07497.jpg   dsc07499.jpg  
__________________
mag318 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 02:11 AM   #69
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: seymour,ct
Posts: 84
Liked 15 Times on 13 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Ruger has no lock. I regularly DA at 50 feet into a three inch circle with my GP100, .357, two seconds per round. Built like a WW2 Tiger tank.

__________________
regload is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 03:33 PM   #70
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Default Ruger all the way

For me there is no comparison. The Ruger is far better built & stronger than the Smith. My GP-100 4.2 " came with Hogue Monogrips & a trigger so smooth that NOTHING was needed to change it. Check out how to disassemble & clean both guns & you will see that the Ruger is way more simple & stronger in design. The Ruger also feels much better in the hand for balance, handling & recoil control. My youngest daughter says it is her favorite weapon & is deadly accurate with it. Customer service from Ruger is also reported to be the best (never needed it myself) & Smith not so good. Smith also caved in to the Clinton Administration (the only gun maker to do so) for a lot of the crap we now have to endure. Rugers are the ultimate: rugged, reliable, American made & owned. BUY THE RUGER & NEVER LOOK BACK!!!!!

__________________
junkguy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger GP100 markaf Revolver Handguns 53 09-04-2012 07:19 PM
Ruger GP100 Deigoboy Revolver Handguns 16 12-22-2011 04:47 AM
Ruger GP100 Sashebby Revolver Handguns 14 02-09-2011 12:38 PM
Ruger GP100 johnm88 Revolver Handguns 2 07-30-2010 03:58 AM
Ruger GP100 GlenJohnson Revolver Handguns 13 01-09-2010 06:32 PM