S&W 686 or Ruger GP100? - Page 7
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns >

S&W 686 or Ruger GP100?


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-12-2012, 01:20 AM   #61
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
HOSSFLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lufkin,Tx
Posts: 6,932
Liked 2182 Times on 1472 Posts
Likes Given: 1191

Default

If money is not a issue----Flip a coin
__________________
Texan By Birth & Choice
USMC/VIET NAM VET
HOSSFLY is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2012, 01:26 AM   #62
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 139
Liked 26 Times on 21 Posts

Default

It all a matter of personal preference. They're both outstanding guns. Regardless of cost, I prefer the GP100. My brother prefers the 686. Is the 686 worth the extra bucks? Not to me. But it was to him, because he "preferred it".

Don <><
__________________
John 14:6 I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
genesis is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 06:07 PM   #63
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona,Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,642
Liked 157 Times on 108 Posts
Likes Given: 119

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mongoose90 View Post
Here is my S & W 686 6 inch. Love this and will never part with it since my Dad gave it to me. It is a 1984 model.
This is my 1984, 6" Model 686, along with the 2 1/2" I purchased shortly after. My wife gave me the 6" as a gift. It was the first gun she ever bought me shortly after we met.

S&W 686 or Ruger GP100? - Revolver Handguns
billt is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2012, 09:26 PM   #64
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
3spur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 98
Default

I just got my GP100 about a month ago and I love it, my husband and I both can't say anything bad about it. I like shooting it with .38 almost no recoil, does have a long trigger pull but gives me time to aim, lol
3spur is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2012, 02:48 AM   #65
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
johnbrowning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 448
Liked 148 Times on 120 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

I had a 586 with trigger work nice piece. I need a new 357 to use so I don't mess up my Colts. Thinking GP100 or 586-686. When did Smith change their manf. process
Also looking at Colt Trooper non-MK III.
johnbrowning is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2012, 03:05 AM   #66
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gig Harbor,WA
Posts: 853
Liked 110 Times on 91 Posts
Likes Given: 219

Default

I can help the op out, one word: yes. (Unless your spouse would beat you with them )
phildenton is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2012, 03:30 AM   #67
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
firedawg60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 365
Liked 32 Times on 26 Posts
Likes Given: 115

Default

Well I just got me a "new to me" 686-2, 4". Well, it's on lay a way.
firedawg60 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2012, 04:20 PM   #68
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
mag318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 398
Liked 77 Times on 57 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I prefer the 686, both are decent revolvers but to me the 686 is a classic. If you shop around you can find an older prelock example for a decent price. Both companies still make serviceable revolvers but they are not the same quality as the older ones. I was at a LGS yesterday and bought a beautiful 686-3 for $450, and at that price I couldn't pass it up. The older prelock ones still have forged steel triggers and hammers and will last a lifetime, probably several.
Here's a photo of my CS1 version that I used as a duty revolver for years. These CS1s are now highly sought after by collectors and knowledgeable shooters alike. I wish I would have bought a couple more when I could have.
dsc07497.jpg   dsc07499.jpg  
mag318 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 02:11 AM   #69
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: seymour,ct
Posts: 106
Liked 23 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 2

Default

Ruger has no lock. I regularly DA at 50 feet into a three inch circle with my GP100, .357, two seconds per round. Built like a WW2 Tiger tank.
regload is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2013, 03:33 PM   #70
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 3
Default Ruger all the way

For me there is no comparison. The Ruger is far better built & stronger than the Smith. My GP-100 4.2 " came with Hogue Monogrips & a trigger so smooth that NOTHING was needed to change it. Check out how to disassemble & clean both guns & you will see that the Ruger is way more simple & stronger in design. The Ruger also feels much better in the hand for balance, handling & recoil control. My youngest daughter says it is her favorite weapon & is deadly accurate with it. Customer service from Ruger is also reported to be the best (never needed it myself) & Smith not so good. Smith also caved in to the Clinton Administration (the only gun maker to do so) for a lot of the crap we now have to endure. Rugers are the ultimate: rugged, reliable, American made & owned. BUY THE RUGER & NEVER LOOK BACK!!!!!
junkguy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Ruger GP100 markaf Revolver Handguns 53 09-04-2012 07:19 PM
Ruger GP100 Deigoboy Revolver Handguns 16 12-22-2011 04:47 AM
Ruger GP100 Sashebby Revolver Handguns 14 02-09-2011 12:38 PM
Ruger GP100 johnm88 Revolver Handguns 2 07-30-2010 03:58 AM
Ruger GP100 GlenJohnson Revolver Handguns 13 01-09-2010 06:32 PM



Newest Threads