Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   Revolver Handguns (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f16/)
-   -   S&W 629 vs S&W 629-1 (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f16/s-w-629-vs-s-w-629-1-a-35388/)

Medic2002 12-09-2010 07:09 PM

S&W 629 vs S&W 629-1
 
I'm looking into getting a 44 mag. I've found a 629 with no dash for $675 and a 629-1 for $500. The person selling the 629 is telling me that it is a better gun than the -1, so I was trying to decide which to buy. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thx!

spittinfire 12-09-2010 07:27 PM

There really isn't much difference unless you are collecting. If you just want a shooter buy the cheaper one.

Medic2002 12-09-2010 07:31 PM

Thx! Will do ;-)

Missileman 12-09-2010 07:41 PM

The major differences are that to save costs with the 629-1 S&W dropped the pinned barrel and no longer recessed the cylinders, items that were standard on the 629. Many shooters believed this is a weakened design, and it was somewhat proven to be in silhouette competition. I don't believe there were a lot of this model made before S&W made improvements with the 629-2.
Short answer, yes, I believe the 629 is a better revolver to have than the 629-1 IMHO.

Medic2002 12-09-2010 07:45 PM

So would you spend the extra 175 for it?

spittinfire 12-09-2010 07:48 PM

Was the 629 ever pinned a recessed? I thought the 29 had it but the 629 didn't. My 629-1 is pinned but not recessed.

Missileman 12-09-2010 08:54 PM

According to what I've seen and read from S&W the original 629 was both pinned and recessed, but the 629-1 was neither pinned nor recessed. Maybe you have an interim between the two?

As far as whether it's worth $175 more I guess that depends on how hard you will use it--probably the normal shooter (not a silhouette competitor) wouldn't see a difference. I've always liked recessed chambers, but that's just a personal prefernce and not grounded in anything otherwise--I do think the pinned barrel is an advantage though...

spittinfire 12-09-2010 09:03 PM

I'm going to check into this some more when I get home. I also like the recessed cylinder like on my S&W 19 and Blackhawk but I've never had a single issue with my 629 which is not recessed. I personally can't see spending $175 more for that.

spittinfire 12-10-2010 01:47 AM

I was mistaken....my 629-1 is neither pinnned, nor recessed. Sorry!

jackg 12-11-2010 07:09 PM

Does S&W use the old "Bait & Switch" plan? They introduce a Model 29 ( for example) and it's reputation is established over a period of time because it has all the bells and whistles available, cutting edge technology as they say. Then, after a while, they start to cut costs of the very popular model by not recessing the cylinder or pinning the barrel and re-issue the model as a 29-1, then -2 and so on?
Is that how they work? It seems that way to me because most dash models don't carry the value of the no dash models.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:53 PM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.