Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com

Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/)
-   Revolver Handguns (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f16/)
-   -   S&W 620 vs. 686 plus? (http://www.firearmstalk.com/forums/f16/s-w-620-vs-686-plus-5659/)

supergus 07-18-2008 01:21 AM

S&W 620 vs. 686 plus?
 
Can't decide:
Both guns are 7 shot, medium frame, 4" barrel. Both have essentially the same overall length. The only differences I can see are that the 686 has a full length barrel shroud, and so is a couple of ounces heavier(not a concern)
Other than that, the 620 is about $40 cheaper. Is there something I'm missing? Obviously the less expensive gun would be my first choice, but then I got to thinking: having the full length shroud would (theoretically) give the barrel more stability, therefore better accuracy, but with a 4" barrel, does that really matter?:confused:

Bob Wright 07-18-2008 02:40 PM

Wasn't too sure what the Model 620 was until I looked it up. From what I could determine, S & W is dropping all K-Frame revolvers, and the 620 is an L-Frame successor.

So, in essence, the only difference is the full lug barrel. I own two Model 586 guns, both early L-Frame blued guns, one a 4" and the other a 6" gun. My own personal preference has been toward muzzle heavy guns, and the 586/686 fits my wants perfectly. The weight out toward the muzzle seems to get me on target a little faster, and dampens recoil more, though with a .357 Magnum recoil is not that much of a problem.

If I were buying, I'd go with the full lug barrel.

Here are some of my Model 29s, two with full lug barrels I had S&W make up for me many years ago.

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i2.../000_10841.jpg




Bob Wright

argyle 08-30-2008 04:16 AM

I'm going through the same evaluation process. The 620 has a 2 piece barrel, with a half -length under lug. I looked at both guns very closely this evening and those were the only differences I saw. I had a couple of 686s in 6" which got stolen, and I absolutely loved them. I have a 619 which is the fixed sight version of the 620 and will see how it shoots before I make the choice. I'll probably end up with the 686 Plus, because the solid mass of metal just seems more substantial and less likely to have problems down the road from heavy use.

Mark F 08-30-2008 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by argyle (Post 38448)
I'm going through the same evaluation process. The 620 has a 2 piece barrel, with a half -length under lug. I looked at both guns very closely this evening and those were the only differences I saw. I had a couple of 686s in 6" which got stolen, and I absolutely loved them. I have a 619 which is the fixed sight version of the 620 and will see how it shoots before I make the choice. I'll probably end up with the 686 Plus, because the solid mass of metal just seems more substantial and less likely to have problems down the road from heavy use.

The really nice thing about 686's is they are build like Sherman tanks... I have always had a fondness for 686's especially the 6" versions. I taught my wife to shoot on a 686...

supergus 08-31-2008 03:43 AM

Once upon a time I had a 686 w/ the 8.4" barrel:eek: I'm not sure that length is even available now. I also shoot a 4" 686 rental gun at the range occasionally. So it looks like it'll be the 686plus:D Then I'll pick up a Henry Big Boy lever action(made in the USA!) chambered in .357mag as a companion..

argyle 08-31-2008 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by supergus (Post 38574)
Once upon a time I had a 686 w/ the 8.4" barrel:eek: I'm not sure that length is even available now. I also shoot a 4" 686 rental gun at the range occasionally. So it looks like it'll be the 686plus:D Then I'll pick up a Henry Big Boy lever action(made in the USA!) chambered in .357mag as a companion..

I looked at a nice selection of used 686s tonight, and I would definitely go with it over the 620. I just like the looks of that solid chunk of metal on the business end rather than the "insert" look of the 620 barrel. The heft seems to make the balance feel a bit better. The strangest thing was that even the oldest ones with the firing pin on the hammer weren't much cheaper than new ones. The darn things are like potato chips - you can't stop with just one. I would like to eventually get one in all 3 sizes - 2.5", 4", and 6". I picked up a blued Ruger GP100 in 4" at a really good price this week, which also whetted my appetite for a 6" in SS. I've got a Marlin 1894C in 357 - from back before they added the safety. Good thing my last car payment will be made in a few days. :D

supergus 09-01-2008 03:34 AM

The Marlin 1894's are sweet, especially with the laminated Dymondwood Stock and the satin stainless... Mmmmm tasty!:D I just want a lever action that has that cowboy look with the brass receiver. Plus Henry is made entirely in the USA. (is the MArlin 100% American made? I dunno)

Mark F 09-01-2008 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by argyle (Post 38578)
I looked at a nice selection of used 686s tonight, and I would definitely go with it over the 620. I just like the looks of that solid chunk of metal on the business end rather than the "insert" look of the 620 barrel. The heft seems to make the balance feel a bit better. The strangest thing was that even the oldest ones with the firing pin on the hammer weren't much cheaper than new ones. The darn things are like potato chips - you can't stop with just one. I would like to eventually get one in all 3 sizes - 2.5", 4", and 6". I picked up a blued Ruger GP100 in 4" at a really good price this week, which also whetted my appetite for a 6" in SS. I've got a Marlin 1894C in 357 - from back before they added the safety. Good thing my last car payment will be made in a few days. :D

That's how it all starts... one gun, then two, and then the "I got to have that one for sure". Before you know it... you have tons of guns. You gotta love it!


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM.

Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.