Ruger V.S. Smith - Page 2
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > Ruger V.S. Smith

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2009, 02:59 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 821
Liked 270 Times on 167 Posts
Likes Given: 21

Default

In my opinion, the L-Frame Smiths are a better choice than the N-framed .357 Magnums. The slightly smaller grips is more easily controlled in rapid DA fire, along with a slightly lower bore axis. My favorite .357 Magnum DA revolvers are my Model 586 Distinguished Combat Magnums.

For everyday carry, its my Model 19 Smith. The Smith & Wessons, of the vintage I own, have the smoothest DA operation of any sixgun I've every tried. Never found a Colt nor a Ruger to equal that, including the vaunted Python.

Bob Wright
Bob Wright is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 03:22 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 12 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

You can't go wrong with either. The S&W will have better/slicker out of box trigger/action but the Ruger is bombproof and timing will remain perfect in the Ruger long after the S&W requires retiming. Now keep in mind this means shooting untold thousands of full power magnum rounds to get to that point. Regardless, the Ruger can be made extremely slick with an good action/polish job. I'm an HUGE Ruger fan so naturally most of my revolvers are Ruger, with a few S&W.
stalkingbear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 09:55 PM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
Default wow

wow the Smiths are so much more in price. But i will tell him to dry fire them to see if the action will blind him from the price.
stuii is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 12:12 PM   #14
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mark F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bedford Texas
Posts: 2,889
Liked 71 Times on 46 Posts
Likes Given: 13

Default

I have both and favor Ruger "slightly" for durability. I also have a Colt KC and it is a magnificent revolver.
__________________
*** Don't Mess With TEXAS ***
Μολὼν λάβε
Mark F is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 02:25 PM   #15
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1176 Times on 511 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

I think the Smiths are a more elegant looking and feeling revolver. The Ruger is more stout and will handle heavy loads on a regular basis. I own both. Both have a place.
__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 04:21 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Fayettedave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 121
Liked 4 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CA357 View Post
I think the Smiths are a more elegant looking and feeling revolver. The Ruger is more stout and will handle heavy loads on a regular basis. I own both. Both have a place.
Ditto on all points.
Fayettedave is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2009, 06:05 PM   #17
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,554
Liked 3179 Times on 1652 Posts
Likes Given: 322

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CA357 View Post
I think the Smiths are a more elegant looking and feeling revolver. The Ruger is more stout and will handle heavy loads on a regular basis. I own both. Both have a place.
I,the Ruger is more stout. The forged steel of the Smith is pound for pound stronger than the investment cast steel of the Rugers.

The 627 is a larger frame than the GP-100 and not really comparable. The 686 would be a better head to head comparison. The 627 is the finest .357 revolver available today, IMHO. The Ruger is a good solid revolver but the 627 is a work of art.
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 01:28 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Prince Frederick,Maryland
Posts: 225
Liked 16 Times on 12 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
I,the Ruger is more stout. The forged steel of the Smith is pound for pound stronger than the investment cast steel of the Rugers.

The 627 is a larger frame than the GP-100 and not really comparable. The 686 would be a better head to head comparison. The 627 is the finest .357 revolver available today, IMHO. The Ruger is a good solid revolver but the 627 is a work of art.
I have the 627-5PC. It really is a work of art: 5" barrel, N frame, stainless, 8 shot, shoots beautifully, has enough weight to dampen recoil with full power loads (46 oz.), but is light enough to be packable in the field.
Clem is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 02:47 AM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
stalkingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lebanon,Ky
Posts: 3,621
Liked 12 Times on 11 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Robocop-you should feel good that just on this post, this is the 1st time I MUST disagree with you. You're wrong in my opinion. The Ruger investment cast steel is exactly same strength pound for pound as S&W forged. I realize this isn't what you want to hear, but the quality/components of the raw steel matter MUCH more than the method of manufacture. You realize that ALL steel is 1st made by casting-mixing carbon and chromium in with iron in a blast furnace results in steel. Also the Ruger revolvers are stronger due to absence of side plate, front & rear locking, and location of the cylinder locking bolt-or latch as Ruger calls it. So basically a Ruger GP100 IS as strong as an N frame S&W due to those features. And yes, I DO own, and shoot both.





Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
I,the Ruger is more stout. The forged steel of the Smith is pound for pound stronger than the investment cast steel of the Rugers.
stalkingbear is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 01:34 PM   #20
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,554
Liked 3179 Times on 1652 Posts
Likes Given: 322

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stalkingbear View Post
Robocop-you should feel good that just on this post, this is the 1st time I MUST disagree with you. You're wrong in my opinion. The Ruger investment cast steel is exactly same strength pound for pound as S&W forged. I realize this isn't what you want to hear, but the quality/components of the raw steel matter MUCH more than the method of manufacture. You realize that ALL steel is 1st made by casting-mixing carbon and chromium in with iron in a blast furnace results in steel. Also the Ruger revolvers are stronger due to absence of side plate, front & rear locking, and location of the cylinder locking bolt-or latch as Ruger calls it. So basically a Ruger GP100 IS as strong as an N frame S&W due to those features. And yes, I DO own, and shoot both.
Dream on! You must be the only person in the world that believes that. Ruger acnowledges it and makes the frame (slightly) bulkier to compensate. Saying cast steel is the same as forged completely ignores the truth.
The flea market sword is just a strong as a 16th century Mamoru Katana? Forging changes the density and strength of steel. Ruger makes many good products. Some even have features superior to the Smiths.
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Smith & Wesson 645 gt5-33 Semi-Auto Handguns 19 04-20-2014 12:55 PM
Smith & Wesson 637 frank002 Concealed Carrying & Personal Protection 11 11-04-2009 01:07 AM
My New Smith & Wesson 637 andyffer Revolver Handguns 2 12-13-2008 11:28 PM
Smith Wesson lasherb1 1911 Forum 1 11-05-2008 11:47 PM
Smith Model 30 Rebailey Revolver Handguns 0 06-01-2007 10:28 PM