Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > New .327 Magnum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-27-2009, 02:10 AM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Virginian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Evangeline,Louisiana
Posts: 795
Liked 113 Times on 87 Posts

Default

It's a thirty two people! It was developed by a gun company and an ammo company trying to ignite interest and make money. As usual, the gun writers have never met an advertiser's product they didn't like. They have aimed the advertising at people who don't like the recoil of a 357. It is just as effective they say; yeah, as 357 wimp loads. This is the second time someone has tried to convince people that 32 is as good as 38. Even with the new math, I don't think too many people are biting. If a thirty two is good enough, then heck, why not a 22 Magnum. it's even easier to shoot, and I have seen penetration numbers.......

__________________

What could have happened... did.

Virginian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 10:46 AM   #12
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mark F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bedford Texas
Posts: 2,855
Liked 47 Times on 30 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

I believe this one will flop.

__________________
*** Don't Mess With TEXAS ***
Μολὼν λάβε
Mark F is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2009, 01:23 PM   #13
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
spittinfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maiden,NC
Posts: 9,663
Liked 83 Times on 54 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cleek View Post
I'll tell you what the practicality of the .327 magnum is. If you were to own a revolver like the SP101, it would be quite a jolt shooting a full load, 158 gr. cartridge through it. This is why most guys will shoot the 110 gr round in the 357 mag version of this gun. So, this puts it on a pretty good playing field with the .327 federal magnum. The 357 will still have a more power at this level, but the 327 wins on a few points; round capacity, felt recoil, and the versatility of shooting four different cartidges. Less recoil makes it easier to manage and more accurate for multiple shots. It is MUCH better than the .32 H&R magnum. Comparing the two would be like comparing the .357 mag against the 38 Special. In summary, if you are looking for a small, powerful self defense revolver, the SP101 in 327 magnum will be a good choice and it will be with us for a while, so get used to it. I might buy one and teach my wife how to use it. She is afraid of semi autos.
I regularly shoot 158 gr 357 mags out of a 2 1/4" Ruger SP101. I personally like the heavier bullets in 357, the lightest I go is 125 and I notice little difference in felt recoil. I see no need for another 32 magnum round, its answering a question no one asked. I think the fact that the round has been out for several years and no one besides Taurus has picked it up is an indication of what we'll see. Think 327 wasn't intended to sound like 357? Why do you think everyone is comparing the two. Its a round that is not needed and is very expensive to shoot, I personaly don't see it catching on.
__________________

If the pain is lacking so is the discipline...

"the only 911 call I need is chambering a round" - Mr. Muller, MO car dealer

spittinfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 03:16 PM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spittinfire View Post
... I think the fact that the round has been out for several years and no one besides Taurus has picked it up is an indication of what we'll see. ....
-----------------

Ruger SP101

Smith and Wesson 632

Taurus M327

Charter Arms Patriot 327

----------------

.327 Federal Magnum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
100 gr (6.5 g) JSP 1,400 ft/s (430 m/s) 435 ft·lbf (590 J)
115 gr (7.5 g) JHP 1,300 ft/s (400 m/s) 431 ft·lbf (584 J)
Test barrel length: 3 1/16"

Compare this to a .38 S&W
.38 S&W - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
158 gr (10.2 g) L SWC 767 ft/s (234 m/s) 206 ft·lbf (279 J)
195 gr (12.6 g) L RN 653 ft/s (199 m/s) 185 ft·lbf (251 J)
200 gr (13 g) LRN 620 ft/s (190 m/s) 176 ft·lbf (239 J)

Or a 9mm:
9x19mm Parabellum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
7.45 g (115.0 gr) FMJ 390 m/s (1,300 ft/s) 570 J (420 ft·lbf)
8.00 g (123.5 gr) FMJ 360 m/s (1,200 ft/s) 518 J (382 ft·lbf)
9.1 g (140 gr) FMJ 305 m/s (1,000 ft/s) 419 J (309 ft·lbf)
9.5 g (147 gr) JHP 368 m/s (1,210 ft/s) 643 J (474 ft·lbf)
7.45 g (115.0 gr) JHP +P+ 435 m/s (1,430 ft/s) 704 J (519 ft·lbf)


or a .38 Super
.38 Super - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
90 gr (5.8 g) JHP 1,557 ft/s (475 m/s) 485 ft·lbf (658 J)
100 gr (6.5 g) FMJ 1,450 ft/s (440 m/s) 467 ft·lbf (633 J)
115 gr (7.5 g) FMJ 1,395 ft/s (425 m/s) 497 ft·lbf (674 J)
130 gr (8.4 g) FMJ 1,305 ft/s (398 m/s) 492 ft·lbf (667 J)
150 gr (9.7 g) FMJ 1,148 ft/s (350 m/s) 439 ft·lbf (595 J)
Test barrel length: 5"
__________________
GettingOld is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2009, 07:34 PM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 427
Default

I don't usually get too excited about, 'new rounds'; in fact, I'm still scratching my head over S&W 40 caliber! (If you want a 45 acp, get a 45 acp.)

In my opinion, there is a place in this world for Federal's 327 magnum. The pistol is versatile, certainly powerful enough not to be sneered at like a normal 32, and the reduced recoil and consequent increased controllability make this caliber useful for the: young, old, and physically challenged (weak).

Neither is ammo availability or excessive cost a problem. In fact four different calibers can be used in Ruger's 327: 32 short, 32 long, 32 magnum, and (of course) ...... .

I like this new chambering and wouldn't hesitate to get it for my wife or a grandparent. (Wouldn't be bent out of shape if I had to throw it in my own pocket, too.) It's got plenty of wallop without the necessity for a really strong grasp. Why is this a bad thing?

Refer: http://www.chuckhawks.com/327_federal.htm

__________________
G21.45 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 04:58 PM   #16
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
spittinfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maiden,NC
Posts: 9,663
Liked 83 Times on 54 Posts
Likes Given: 5

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GettingOld View Post
-----------------

Ruger SP101

Smith and Wesson 632

Taurus M327

Charter Arms Patriot 327

----------------

.327 Federal Magnum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
100 gr (6.5 g) JSP 1,400 ft/s (430 m/s) 435 ft·lbf (590 J)
115 gr (7.5 g) JHP 1,300 ft/s (400 m/s) 431 ft·lbf (584 J)
Test barrel length: 3 1/16"

Compare this to a .38 S&W
.38 S&W - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
158 gr (10.2 g) L SWC 767 ft/s (234 m/s) 206 ft·lbf (279 J)
195 gr (12.6 g) L RN 653 ft/s (199 m/s) 185 ft·lbf (251 J)
200 gr (13 g) LRN 620 ft/s (190 m/s) 176 ft·lbf (239 J)

Or a 9mm:
9x19mm Parabellum - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
7.45 g (115.0 gr) FMJ 390 m/s (1,300 ft/s) 570 J (420 ft·lbf)
8.00 g (123.5 gr) FMJ 360 m/s (1,200 ft/s) 518 J (382 ft·lbf)
9.1 g (140 gr) FMJ 305 m/s (1,000 ft/s) 419 J (309 ft·lbf)
9.5 g (147 gr) JHP 368 m/s (1,210 ft/s) 643 J (474 ft·lbf)
7.45 g (115.0 gr) JHP +P+ 435 m/s (1,430 ft/s) 704 J (519 ft·lbf)


or a .38 Super
.38 Super - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ballistic performance
Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
90 gr (5.8 g) JHP 1,557 ft/s (475 m/s) 485 ft·lbf (658 J)
100 gr (6.5 g) FMJ 1,450 ft/s (440 m/s) 467 ft·lbf (633 J)
115 gr (7.5 g) FMJ 1,395 ft/s (425 m/s) 497 ft·lbf (674 J)
130 gr (8.4 g) FMJ 1,305 ft/s (398 m/s) 492 ft·lbf (667 J)
150 gr (9.7 g) FMJ 1,148 ft/s (350 m/s) 439 ft·lbf (595 J)
Test barrel length: 5"
I stand corrected, there are other gun manufacturers making a platform...

You left out 22 magnum.....

Bullet weight/type Velocity Energy
30 gr (1.9 g) HP 2,200 ft/s (670 m/s) 322 ft·lbf (437 J)
40 gr (2.6 g) JHP 1,910 ft/s (580 m/s) 324 ft·lbf (439 J)
50 gr (3.2 g) JHP 1,650 ft/s (500 m/s) 300 ft·lbf (410 J)

I'm sorry, I'm just not impressed with the round. I don't think it answers any questions. At least not a commonly asked one.
__________________

If the pain is lacking so is the discipline...

"the only 911 call I need is chambering a round" - Mr. Muller, MO car dealer

spittinfire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2009, 08:56 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
fxstchewy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Newton,NC
Posts: 121
Default

I would mainly be concerned with getting good ammo for it on down the road, what good is a SP101 with 32 H&R ?, i would rather go with the SP101 or whatever gun in .357 a proven load with the ability to shoot .38's with it..........

__________________

"In God We Trust"

fxstchewy is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 02:36 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Keyser, WV,Keyser, WV
Posts: 2
Default

So all U people who don't care for the 327--to bad. I got the wife something bigger than a 22 and smaller than a 38. Got her a GP100 327 Fed Mag.
Very nice and shots v. good. Oh, and it had to be a wheel guln, none of
those autos for this girl.

__________________
ChuckO is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 03:02 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Rick1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Clifton,Colorado
Posts: 3,977
Liked 1640 Times on 926 Posts
Likes Given: 1093

Default

I may look at one. My wife is trying to talk me into buying her a S&W Airweight in 22 mag. She wants a carry gun. I don't think so!!!! I would much rather her be shooting a 100 grain bullet than a 30, 40, or 50 grain bullet. But, the key is I want her to have something she will take to the range and actually practice with. I would rather she carry a .327 she is proficient with than .357 she refuses to shoot.

__________________

Romans 1:16 I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.

Rick1967 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 06:03 PM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,323
Liked 5 Times on 4 Posts

Default

Right on Rick. I don't feel a need for a .327 but if somebody does, buy one. That's the way America works. Folks may sneer at it, but I bet nobody volunteers to be shot by it.

__________________
freefall is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
.44 Magnum - Do They?? Dillinger 1911 Forum 43 01-21-2009 07:38 PM
357 Magnum Ammo Gramps Revolver Handguns 5 08-22-2008 01:02 PM
Firebird Magnum SWX iall Gunsmithing Forum 3 02-22-2008 12:56 AM
Hypervelocity vs Magnum MrM4A1 Ammunition & Reloading 2 07-10-2007 05:50 AM
.357 Magnum Grips? handgunpalooza Revolver Handguns 2 07-03-2007 12:23 PM