Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > Dakota 44-40

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-08-2007, 03:54 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Default Dakota 44-40

Is the dakota 44-40 more of a hunting weapon or more of a home defense weapon, what are your thoughts?



__________________
Zoidberg is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 08-08-2007, 09:18 PM   #2
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,005
Liked 2686 Times on 1405 Posts
Likes Given: 216

Default dakota

generally speaking, neither. the 44-40 is a cowboy action caliber. mostly used now a days for punchinig paper and steel.



__________________
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 11:11 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
FALPhil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 282
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
generally speaking, neither. the 44-40 is a cowboy action caliber. mostly used now a days for punchinig paper and steel.
Yeah. Because it is a black-powder era cartridge, the 44-40 has never seen its true potential in commercial loadings and modern firearms. A lot of the old brass was what the call "balloon head", and therefore not suitable for anything but low pressure.

Here is a good article on the cartridge:
The 44-40

The article says it will put a 205 gr pill out the muzzle at 931fps. That is adequate for self defense.
__________________
FALPhil is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 12:48 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 40
Default

I read an article about a year ago where the author made the assertion that the 44-40 was the 19th century version of today's 40 cal. He made his point pretty well.

__________________
Dutch is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 05:17 PM   #5
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,005
Liked 2686 Times on 1405 Posts
Likes Given: 216

Default .44-40

IMHO the 38-40 was the .40 S&W of its day. The .38-40 used a .40 caliber bullet, not a .38. The ballistics were very similar to todays .40 S&W. The .44-40 used a .427 bullet and was much more similar to the .44 spl in ballistics.

__________________
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2007, 09:29 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

Colt-style single actions aren't the best choice for self-defense, but they beat the hell out of nothing. They're slow to reload, and more complex to operate; on the other hand, they're probably the best natural pointers, and they kill BGs just as dead as they did in 1880. If a .44-40 were all I had, I certainly wouldn't feel disarmed.



__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Dakota rifles? Uncle Tom General Rifle Discussion 18 08-28-2011 05:46 PM
Dakota 357 part Mccoles Revolver Handguns 1 02-09-2009 10:34 AM
South Dakota gun registration... mike481 Politics, Religion and Controversy 2 11-30-2008 01:30 PM



Newest Threads