.357 vs .44 - Page 12
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Revolver Handguns > .357 vs .44

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2013, 02:34 PM   #111
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,166
Liked 9516 Times on 4094 Posts
Likes Given: 1497

Default

Note 1- Most African big game has a minimum caliber for legal hunting. That caliber is usually .375 Holland & Holland RIFLE, not a handgun.

Note 2- to all involved- style, grace, manners. Or you will be removed from the forum. Without regard to age- and I have grandchildren older than many folks here. I do not care who started it, it ends now.

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 05:17 PM   #112
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 246
Liked 25 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 51

Default

I am sure one and all are familiar with the story of the two motorists , headed in opposite direction, who meet in the middle of a one lane bridge. The first yells , "I never back up for a fool!" The second puts his auto in reverse, and replies, "I always do!"
I've been privileged to have been shooting for 57 years, shooting shortguns for 51 years, and reloading for 44 years. I have learned an amazing amount on this forum. All of the serious shooters I have run in to have been helpful to one another.

__________________
headhunter is offline  
Anna_Purna Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 05:23 PM   #113
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,166
Liked 9516 Times on 4094 Posts
Likes Given: 1497

Default

As the Knight Templar said in Indiana Jones-
chose-poorly.jpg


Folks- we do not get our jollies nor a bounty on bouncing folks off the forum, but for people that will not pay attention, we damn sure will.

We now return you to our discussion of .357 vs .44 mag that is in progress....

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 06:46 PM   #114
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
nixfix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 117
Liked 28 Times on 17 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c3shooter View Post
As the Knight Templar said in Indiana Jones-
Attachment 103001


Folks- we do not get our jollies nor a bounty on bouncing folks off the forum, but for people that will not pay attention, we damn sure will.

We now return you to our discussion of .357 vs .44 mag that is in progress....
Looks like what we had there was a failure to communicate.

As for 44 versus 357, my vote is 44 Magnum. In my circumstance, the only application for a revolver is at the range. Might as well have more boom! Of course, I'm also a recoil junkie...
__________________
nixfix is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 10:21 PM   #115
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4792 Times on 2680 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

The old rule for an Outdoorsmans hand gun was 40/200/1000. That means a bullet of at least .40 Caliber weighing 200 grs. at a velocity of at least 1,000 Fps. It is an old rule but may be worth considering even today.

__________________
nitestalker is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 12:51 AM   #116
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Anna_Purna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,236
Liked 6751 Times on 3669 Posts
Likes Given: 5796

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitestalker View Post
The old rule for an Outdoorsmans hand gun was 40/200/1000. That means a bullet of at least .40 Caliber weighing 200 grs. at a velocity of at least 1,000 Fps. It is an old rule but may be worth considering even today.
If they made a 475 linebaugh in an auto no bigger than a 1911 and had no bigger kick than my 357 magnum, I'd be wearing that when I go hiking in the woods up north.
__________________
Anna_Purna is offline  
nitestalker Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 12:57 AM   #117
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,166
Liked 9516 Times on 4094 Posts
Likes Given: 1497

Default

Depending on what you are shooting, that could be a very good rule.

Having said that, I hunt Eastern Whitetail with a 357 magnum. HOWEVER- in an area where my longest shot will be under 50 yards, 10 inch barreled revolver, handloads with a hard cast 185 gr bullet.

If I do my part, it does its part.

However, if the game was bear- especially grizzly, Alaskan Brown, polar, would want something else.

The 25mm chain gun on a Bradley would be just about right, I think......

This is what they put around the outside stairs at the Prudhoe Bay oil patch- to keep the bears off the stairs.

polar-bear-shield.jpg

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
2
People Like This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 01:17 AM   #118
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Gig Harbor,WA
Posts: 846
Liked 109 Times on 90 Posts
Likes Given: 219

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitestalker View Post
The old rule for an Outdoorsmans hand gun was 40/200/1000. That means a bullet of at least .40 Caliber weighing 200 grs. at a velocity of at least 1,000 Fps. It is an old rule but may be worth considering even today.
Interesting, was this for in general, or more specific purpose? A solid hard cast bullet would have good penetration i imagine. 41 mag would cover those specs?
__________________
phildenton is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 02:01 AM   #119
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Edge of Darkness
Posts: 6,495
Liked 4792 Times on 2680 Posts
Likes Given: 1736

Default

This goes back to the days of the .44 Specialist, a group headed by Elmer Kieth. They were the "Pioneers" of modern handgun hunting. These are the men who developed the .44 Magnum and the orphan .41 Magnum. The .41 Magnum was developed for law enforcement in the wonderful S&W Mdl. 58.

__________________
nitestalker is offline  
axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 02:09 AM   #120
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 28,709
Liked 21996 Times on 12402 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nitestalker View Post
This goes back to the days of the .44 Specialist, a group headed by Elmer Kieth. They were the "Pioneers" of modern handgun hunting. These are the men who developed the .44 Magnum and the orphan .41 Magnum. The .41 Magnum was developed for law enforcement in the wonderful S&W Mdl. 58.
one of these days, i want to own a S & W in 41 Magnum! i hve shot only a few rounds of 41 in my life, but i liked it. it's shame it never got the recognition it should have, because it's a wonderful cartridge.
__________________
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes