You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns >

What do you guys think of the Beretta 92?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2010, 05:26 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Albuquerque,New Mexico
Posts: 138
Liked 7 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default What do you guys think of the Beretta 92?

I was at the local sporting goods store not too long ago, looking for a Desert Eagle holster(yes, I had an ill conceived notion to carry the DE), and I handled a Beretta 92. I wanted to get the model chambered in .40 smith(which I think is a different model, but the one they had is similar to the 92). I'm still somewhat unsure about the 9mm as a defensive weapon, so I got my heart set on the .40. The gun felt good in my hands, and I actually shot a 92 a long time ago, but I don't remember how it shoots etc. Opinions?
Tidalforce79 is offline  
Reply With Quote

Join Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join Today! - Click Here

Old 10-17-2010, 06:06 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
mesinge2's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,535
Liked 8 Times on 6 Posts
Likes Given: 1


I have fired the BHP, the Glock 17 and personally I really like my M9A1. It is, now, the most accurate 9mm I have ever shot. The funny thing was that it required a looong break-in.

It never jammed, but the accuracy didn't dial-in until around the 350th round down the barrel. I don't know if it was just parts wearing on themselves until they polished themselves out or what? But now it seems crazy accurate. This target is one full mag at 35 yards, slow firing with a two handed hold:

Attachment 20501

The only 357 magnum to me is the Ruger Security Six!!

Last edited by mesinge2; 11-11-2011 at 04:16 PM.
mesinge2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2010, 07:58 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
JonM's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 19,886
Liked 7407 Times on 3953 Posts
Likes Given: 590


never liked em. carried em in the army and crap was always getting stuck tween the slide and barrel. found them to be less reliable and less accurate than the ww2 era 1911's we lost to get those. anyway thats just my two primers worth.
JonM is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2010, 08:14 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
hunter Joe's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,413
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts


The 96 Brigadier is the 40 cal model and I truly believe that both models are fine firearms and would be a bonus to anyones collection. I have a soft spot for metal frame firearms.
God, Family, Guns, in that order.
hunter Joe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2010, 08:46 PM   #5
FAA licensed bugsmasher
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
ScottA's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Davenport,IA
Posts: 7,141
Liked 2482 Times on 1330 Posts
Likes Given: 879


I don't care for them. Not comfortable in my hands at all. But YMMV.

If you're not representing Jesus in a way that makes people want to hang out with you, you're doing it wrong.
Those who refuse to participate in politics shall be governed by their inferiors. -Plato
Join the NRA
ScottA is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 06:06 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
hemiram's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 37

I've wanted one since I first shot one, back in late '76 or so. One of the guys that shot at the same range I did brought one back from Italy. I somehow managed to keep missing out on a bunch of great deals on one, until last year, when I hit on a barely shot one on Gunbroker, with a bunch of mags, for $405.
It's gota couple of tiny nicks on it, and basically, it looks new.
hemiram is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 01:14 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Missileman's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Omaha,Nebraska
Posts: 492
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


I have a 92 now and carried one in the service--I like them. They are somewhat large, but I've never had a malfunction with mine and it shoots where it points. I've never shot the 96 version, but other than recoil I imagine it is similar. Every pistol collection needs a 92 in my opinion, if only so you can shoot in national matches if so desired...

"Adversity does not make a man--it reveals him"
Missileman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 04:47 PM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
indyfan's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Las Cruces
Posts: 422
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


The only downside is the weight of the weapon, that is if you plan to carry it alot. I owned a M92FS for a year, nearly 700 rounds through it without any malfunctions. The most accurate 9 I've ever fired. Loved the ergonomics on it, nice and round grips.

Just recently traded her in for a Glock 19 because a full-size handgun didn't fit my current handgun needs.

Beautiful looking gun. That Beretta.
indyfan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 04:56 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
FCross7's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,017
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts


I've never fired one, but I have held it, and I prefer the CZ 75 line of pistols. My SP-01 has some excellent ergonomics, is extremely accurate and has been 100% reliable for the 600 or so rounds I've fired through it. It fits in the same category (full-sized metal frame), and is around the same price, but in my opinion, is a better fit for me.

Before you buy anything you should go to a shop that has a lot of pistols, hold some and see what feels best to you. That should be the biggest determining factor.

"Breathe when you can, shoot when you should."
-Rob Leatham


"Qui desiderat pacem, bellum praeparat; nemo provocare ne offendere audet quem intelliget superiorem esse pugnaturem"
FCross7 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 11:33 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
hideit's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: west chester,ohio
Posts: 96

its very relible - it was tested to hell and back before it got the military contract
if you like the style then ok but it is BIG
a lot of people forget that the military tests gave the nod to the sig 226 but with the rest of the contract obligations like parts replacement costs - sig lost the bid
Attitude is Everything
hideit is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
What do you guys think of the BERETTA CX4 .40? dsmith84 General Rifle Discussion 5 09-19-2009 07:53 PM
What do you guys think? LtpLegend General Shotgun Discussion 2 06-12-2009 12:49 AM
Guys, I need your help dog2000tj The Club House 25 06-07-2009 11:36 PM