Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > Sig p232...thoughts/experiences?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-21-2010, 08:14 PM   #1
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,347
Liked 223 Times on 180 Posts
Likes Given: 28

Default Sig p232...thoughts/experiences?

First off, I'm not real big on .380acp. But I saw an interesting deal for a Sig P232, and I am in the paperwork process of getting my concealed license. Figured if I don't like it, I could move it along and recover my investment easy enough. So I'd like to hear some impressions of this gun, particularly as a carry piece. And is the price as good as I think it is?

The details:

Sig 232, excellent 95+% condition
2-tone, stainless slide
Night sights
Hogue grips + original plastics grips
Holster, box of PMC, 2 mags, and orginal case/paperwork

$450

__________________
sweeper22 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-21-2010, 09:28 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Don Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas / Forth Worth Area Texas
Posts: 415
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

Sounds like a solid deal to me.

I own four Sig's .. and 2 of them are .380's


My 2 .380's are a

P 230SL



and a P 232 SL



Both of these guns have had a lot of shot's down range w/o a problem one.

As far as the .380 caliber it's self - with or w/o +P loads they are a very good self defense round.

Old timers (myself included) didn't use to think much of .380's,

but the new rounds penetrate as good as some 9mm and .38's - lot's of tests to prove it.

__________________
Don Davis is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 04:41 AM   #3
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,347
Liked 223 Times on 180 Posts
Likes Given: 28

Default

Thanks for the info. Very much appreciated.

Looks like someone may have beat me to the punch on this one, but I'll keep an eye on it. Still not sure which direction I'll head for CC, or even how committed I'll be to carrying. But I figure it (paperwork/training) is a process worth beginning and I'll see where it goes.

__________________
sweeper22 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 09:07 AM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 21 Times on 7 Posts

Default

I've owned a couple of these and they are very elegant, good shooting guns. A little large for the caliber but they sure feel good in your hand. Many folks sneeze at the .380 for a carry gun but I don't. I carried my PPK constantly until I got my Sig 238. It's hot here in SE GA and small/light is a real good thing...

__________________
NGIB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 09:12 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 6,262
Liked 2 Times on 1 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweeper22 View Post
First off, I'm not real big on .380acp. But I saw an interesting deal for a Sig P232, and I am in the paperwork process of getting my concealed license. Figured if I don't like it, I could move it along and recover my investment easy enough. So I'd like to hear some impressions of this gun, particularly as a carry piece. And is the price as good as I think it is?

The details:

Sig 232, excellent 95+% condition
2-tone, stainless slide
Night sights
Hogue grips + original plastics grips
Holster, box of PMC, 2 mags, and orginal case/paperwork

$450
Looks good to me! I prefer larger calibers for carry, but I'm not going to knock on the .380. With the defensive ammo they have these days it is a formittable round. It also opens up alot more carry options.

.380 ammo has a pretty steep price and is a little rare compared to 9mm, something to consider.
__________________
Gojubrian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2010, 06:04 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,347
Liked 223 Times on 180 Posts
Likes Given: 28

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NGIB View Post
I've owned a couple of these and they are very elegant, good shooting guns. A little large for the caliber but they sure feel good in your hand. Many folks sneeze at the .380 for a carry gun but I don't. I carried my PPK constantly until I got my Sig 238. It's hot here in SE GA and small/light is a real good thing...
Thanks for the info. It seems like a gun that sort of bridges the gap between the less shooter-friendly pocket subcompacts and bigger but less concealable regular compacts.

I guess one way or another you'll always conceed something between performance and convenience. The p232 seems like a nice compromise.
__________________
sweeper22 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2011, 02:27 PM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: boca,fl
Posts: 32
Default

I have a 2010 P232 and it's too undependable to use as a carry weapon. I was told 'I bought the best', and it is been at the Sig repair center and in the gun case.

Paid $600, and another $250 in ammo and range fees ... cheap guns get expensive fast. Sig says I need to run the $40 ammo for dependability.

I could have bought a CZ-83 for $210, and shot $9 ammo all day long.

__________________
theskunk1946 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2011, 05:30 AM   #8
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6
Default

I can honestly say I've never had issues with my 232 not firing a certain type of ammo, or being unreliable at all. I shoot standard Remington loads which are not pricy.

Never had a jam, stovepipe or miss-feed. I enjoy how accurate it is for it's size, and the fact that it is easy to cc.

Definitely a firearm that I recommend to friends

__________________

NRA Endowment Member
host of www.triggertalk.tv

Reuben_Mishler is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2011, 01:24 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Don Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dallas / Forth Worth Area Texas
Posts: 415
Liked 9 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 3

Default

@ theskunk1946

Sorry to hear about your problems,

But I've had no problems with either of my Sig's.

__________________
Don Davis is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2011, 03:17 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: boca,fl
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Davis View Post
@ theskunk1946

Sorry to hear about your problems,

But I've had no problems with either of my Sig's.


The later model Sig 232s have a problem with the breech face (it's missing the shell containment recess). The shell never hits the extractor, instead it uses the ejector to fling the shell out.

My 232 is a 2010 model, so maybe earlier models weren't effected
__________________
theskunk1946 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Advantage Arms Conversion order experiences Ifticar Glock Forum 5 08-08-2011 06:41 AM
Sig p232 mwtx Semi-Auto Handguns 14 03-12-2011 05:12 PM
SIG P232 or Glock 26 GuerrillaBob Semi-Auto Handguns 6 06-26-2009 12:49 AM
thoughts on the PPK? lovetoshoot General Handgun Discussion 13 09-28-2008 04:20 AM
Advantage Arms Conversion Kit Experiences westernamerican Glock Forum 2 10-01-2007 02:20 AM



Newest Threads