Ruger 22/45 v MkII or MkIII ?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > Ruger 22/45 v MkII or MkIII ?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-07-2010, 03:56 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Wheelspin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indianapolis,Indiana
Posts: 199
Default Ruger 22/45 v MkII or MkIII ?

Got another question for those of you that have owned and shot some of the Ruger 22lr pistol range...

I'm pretty sure my next purchase will be a 22lr pistol for some cheap fun range time and it'll also be a good way to hopefully get my wife interested in shooting.
I've already searched through the forum and it seems the Ruger range of pistols seems to be the most popular in terms of handling and reliability so my question is would I be better to go with a MkII, a MkIII or the 22/45? Anyone owned or shot all 3? pros or cons of one over the other?

The 22/45 is cheaper which would be a plus with the wife but for the same price of a new 22/45 would a used MkII or MkIII be a better buy?

I've held all 3 and found them all comfortable. The grip angle of the 22/45 did fell a little more natural but the slightly heavier weight of the MkIII felt a little better. I'm looking at the 5.5" barrel versions BTW

Like I said it'll be a range toy for cheap shooting and target practice and to hopefully get my wife behind a gun. She's already said she's got no interest in trying my rifle but she did show a little interest after I bought my Taurus PT92 home but to be honest she scares me. I'd much rather she shot herself in the foot with a 22 than a 9mm. I kid I kid but hopefully you get the idea, Start her easy then move on up. I'm also thinking a pistol like this with it build quality etc would mean it can be something I can teach my daughter to use when she's old enough so I want to get something I'm going to hold on to for some time.

Opinions? options? sugestions?

Thanks

__________________

• Any ship can be a minesweeper ... once.
- Admiral Hornblower

• The purpose of war is not to die for your country. The purpose of war is to ensure that the other guy dies for his country.
- General Patton

• When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not our friend.
- US Marine Corps

Wheelspin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-07-2010, 04:06 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
CA357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 19,871
Liked 1175 Times on 510 Posts
Likes Given: 2978

Default

When I bought my Mk III, I also looked at the 22/45 because the grip angle mimics a 1911. While I liked the grip angle, the polymer frame felt terrible to me.

__________________
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”Samuel Adams
CA357 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 04:13 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,152
Liked 22 Times on 7 Posts

Default

(Like most everything else), I've owned multiples of all three. My beef with the 22/45 is the grip feels very thin and not really comfortable. Overall, I prefer the Mk II to an unmodified Mk III as I really dislike mag disconnects. Having said that, it's not difficult to remove the crap Ruger "lawyered" into the Mk III and make it a Mk II. I've owned different barrel lengths but I prefer the 4" bull barrel. My sole remaining in this category is a Mk III Hunter that I just love to shoot...

__________________
NGIB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 04:19 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DrumJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Here in the holler....
Posts: 4,823
Liked 1616 Times on 944 Posts
Likes Given: 1894

Default

One of the neat things about the 22/45 is the grip angle is almost exact to a 1911. Making it a good practice pistol without buying one of those conversion kits that I just don't like. I'd rather buy another pistol than have a gun and an half. But that's me. I still have the 22/45 and love it but I ended up converting it to a more target friendly weapon with a 9" barrel from Tactical Solutions. So my mild mannered 22/45 went from this


To this! The longer barrel is actually lighter being it's aluminum with a steel insert for the areas that the bullet has contact. I found with the poly frame the steel barrel made it balance a little funny. So if I had it to do again I might have got a MKII or MKIII target model. But it's a real tack driver now. Even has a threaded barrel to add ...things to although the idea of a suppressor seems funny to me unless you are doing drive by's to small woodland creatures.



About your question if what's better that all depends what feels better to the hand of the shooter. Any of the MK I, II, III pistols are a great choice.
It's really hard to say what's better. All of them make a fine addition t any collection.

You might want to check out the Browning Buckmark (I don't have a handy pic of mine..I'll have to make one tonight. The camper models are great and cost about the same as the Rugers. And personally I think the Browning has a better trigger to of the box. Some are even adjustable.

__________________

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

DrumJunkie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 05:36 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Wheelspin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indianapolis,Indiana
Posts: 199
Default

Thanks for the replies, keep em coming though

The polymer frame of the 22/45 doesnt bother me but I did prefer the feel and weight of the steel MKII's and III's I've handled. So the differences between the II and II is the relocated mag release (which would feel more natural as it mimics my existing handgun) and the mag safety feature (which wouldn't bother me as I'd fire till empty anyway then just reload). Hmmmm

I hadn't thought of the Browning Buckmark, i'll have to look in to those Drumjukie. I've looked at and handled the S&W 22A's and the Beretta Neos but neither of them felt quite right in my hand which is why I came back to the Rugers.

__________________

• Any ship can be a minesweeper ... once.
- Admiral Hornblower

• The purpose of war is not to die for your country. The purpose of war is to ensure that the other guy dies for his country.
- General Patton

• When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is not our friend.
- US Marine Corps

Wheelspin is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 09:39 PM   #6
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
utf59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange Park,FL
Posts: 671
Liked 42 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 53

Default

If you're trying to get your wife into shooting, I suggest you let her pick out the gun.

__________________

"An armed society is a polite society." — Robert A. Heinlein

"After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. I sure as hell wouldn't want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military."
— William S. Burroughs

utf59 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 11:45 PM   #7
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 17,748
Liked 5800 Times on 3028 Posts
Likes Given: 397

Default

i sold my 22/45 and bought a mk2. the one i had was one of the early ones and constantly stove piped regardless of ammo brand. i didnt get a mk3 cuz i dont like magazine safeties if i have a choice. nor do i ike loaded chamber indicators. just more parts to break and a vector for developing lazy gun safety practices.

__________________
JonM is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Holster for a Ruger MkIII with red dot DuckA .22 Rifle/Rimfire Discussion 6 03-01-2010 12:24 AM
Ruger MKIII and MKII 22/45 Polymer Grip Frame Aftermarket Grips NWI Sponsor Display 3 09-26-2009 05:54 AM
Ruger MKIII 22/45 extended mag base pad NWI Semi-Auto Handguns 0 04-12-2009 09:56 PM
Ruger MKIII Doubling ?? pawn Semi-Auto Handguns 6 01-26-2009 11:03 PM