Rapid fire


Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > Rapid fire

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2009, 02:09 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
351mustang65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 24
Default Rapid fire

Well I am almost done with the nightwatchman job so im going to be shooting my new gun within the next week.

I just wanted to know is it bad for your gun if you shoot 17 rounds as fast as you can? I have been told it can be bad for your gun but I did not think it was that bad for it and i see guys on youtube do it all the time so is it ok or are the guys on youtube just dumb?



__________________

Last edited by 351mustang65; 07-04-2009 at 02:18 PM.
351mustang65 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 07-04-2009, 02:19 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
hillbilly68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,000
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Won't hurt it if you have such an inclination, but it really serves no purpose. "As fast as you can" implies no control, just work up to as fast as you can shoot with control and precision (well...handgun "precision" that is). No training value to it and will waste your hard earned ammo money by just blowing off rounds. FWIW



__________________

________________________________________
"I'm your brother, just make it count."

hillbilly68 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 04:17 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
tookalisten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 32
Default

I agree with hillbilly; I think each time you pull the trigger on the range, it should be with the specific purpose of practicing a specific technique with a specific outcome in mind. I do not think it will hurt a well made, modern gun; but just emptying the magazine as fast as possible just wastes ammo. Those YouTube videos actually make me cringe as they often promote a bad image to the already suspicious general public.

__________________
tookalisten is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:20 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 6,262
Liked 3 Times on 2 Posts

Default

Most ranges won't allow rapid fire.

I also agree with hillbilly, just a waste. But, it can be fun!

__________________
Gojubrian is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:37 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 973
Default

rapid fire won't hurt your firearm...

it all depends on what kind of training you're doing....
if you're training for marksmanship then rapid fire serves no purpose....
if you're training for street survival you should train in multiple-shot bursts: 1,2,3,4, rather than the 1....2....3....4 like most tend to do at the range.

Train that your multiple-shot bursts are consistent 8-inch groups on the target. I see people get targets with badguy silhouettes and practice head-shots. I always think; " how practical is that in street survival". You should be aiming for center mass, but hits anywhere on a badguy are great. It's the ones that miss that do no good and harm us because of the liability they represent.

__________________
UnderFire is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2009, 09:54 PM   #6
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
c3shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Third bunker on the right,Central Virginia
Posts: 17,187
Liked 9557 Times on 4114 Posts
Likes Given: 1499

Default

1. Within reason (500 rounds and the gun has caught fire) rapid fire will not harm a firearm.
2. Most repid fire serves no purpose other than to make noise
3. If you rely on You Tube for info, you have several other disappointments waiting for you

__________________

What we have here is... failure- to communicate.

c3shooter is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 08:00 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
351mustang65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by c3shooter View Post
2. Most repid fire serves no purpose other than to make noise
3. If you rely on You Tube for info, you have several other disappointments waiting for you
Well its not that im going to be popping off 17 rounds as fast as I can every time I go to the range are that I get my info from youtube.

Me and a buddy watched a video on youtube of a guy rapid firing a SR9 and my buddy said that is bad for the gun and I did not think it was so I came here and asked.
__________________

Last edited by 351mustang65; 07-05-2009 at 08:07 AM.
351mustang65 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 09:44 AM   #8
WDB
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
WDB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Nonya,WA
Posts: 3,991
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

It isn't bad for the firearm as most quality firearms are build to fire at the cycle rate. As many have already expressed it offers no value, you have to hit the target, at best it's a rush. I expect most of us have done it once or twice just for fun.



__________________

Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benning Boy View Post
If you're really bored, I'm your huckleberry. If you really want a challenge, I'm the one.

If you're really smart, you'll just peddle your paint.
WDB is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Under Fire skullcrusher The Club House 7 02-26-2009 02:49 AM
Pre-Fire preparation bgeddes Semi-Auto Handguns 2 08-25-2008 04:01 AM
When you fire Skeletor Blackpowder & Musket 2 10-05-2007 09:12 AM
Fox Fire books?? gsp Survival & Sustenance Living Forum 4 09-23-2007 03:23 AM
Dry Fire Question? Huntress Glock Forum 8 09-22-2007 07:15 PM