Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > PPK/s

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-14-2007, 04:42 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5
Default PPK/s

Does anyone have any thoughts on the PPK/s advantages / disadvantages / reliability / cost effectiveness?

__________________
UncleBuck is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 08-14-2007, 05:37 PM   #2
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
cnorman18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Worth,Texas
Posts: 457
Liked 24 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 4

Default

The PPK/S is basically a PPK slide on a modified PP frame. The grip is slightly longer than a standard PPK's, which gives you marginally better control and a slightly larger magazine capacity at the cost of more difficult concealment, though the difference is small on all counts. Since the PP series are basically all concealment guns, I'd go with the standard PPK.

IMHO, a much better option is the Kel-Tec P3AT. It's still a .380, but half the size, one-third the weight, and much less than half the price. I have one, and I love it.

Full disclosure: Kel-Tecs have a reputation for having FTF and FTE problems out of the box, but the company invariably fixes them VERY quickly and at no charge when returned for service. This seems to apply more to first-generation guns than to current manufacture. I recommend the hard-chromed model; I've heard of very few problems with those. Mine is a HC 2nd-gen model, and I've put several hundred rounds of 10 different brands and styles of ammo through it without a single malfunction of any kind.

Walthers are made like Swiss watches, and they have that James. Bond cachet--but compared to the KT they're big, heavy, and expensive. I doubt if the BG you shoot with either will know the difference.

__________________

"Valor needs first strength, then a weapon."
-- J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973)

"Free men have arms; slaves do not."
-- William Blackstone (1723-1780)

cnorman18 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 06:22 AM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 28
Default

I had an older PPK/s in 380; I didn't like it. Mine seemed to draw blood on me every time it went to the range. I believe the problem was not the gun, but the chambering... I recently picked up a stainless PPK/s in .32 and discovered the europeans were on to something there. The .32 ACP round tames the PPK/s tendency to nip and nibble at the hand that shoots it, and accuracy is stellar; the Walther PP is also a wonderful gun in .32 and they were recently imported in serious numbers. I agree that the Kel-Tec is cheaper, smaller, lighter and easier to pack in both .32 and .380. My Kel-Tec .32 is my "always" gun ( I toted a Seecamp for a while and got hooked on the silvertip in .32), but it is fun to take the Walther out and hear that James Bond theme music in my head while I plink at pop cans!

__________________
sixgunsamori is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2007, 03:10 PM   #4
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 9,893
Liked 2555 Times on 1342 Posts
Likes Given: 192

Default Ppk/s

If you have large hands you will not be happy with walthers. They will slice you up. The Sig 230 will do the same thing. I have not shot a 232 but imagine it is very similar to the 230.

For me, a .380 is a pocket gun that will get some degree of abuse. I am unwilling to spend Walther/Sig $'s on a pocket gun. A reliable Kel-tek or other similar weapon would be far better for the job. I would secure a Walther in a quality holster. If I am going to holster the handgun, I am going to carry a more substantial caliber than .380.

__________________
robocop10mm is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2007, 06:54 PM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Pounce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 222
Liked 2 Times on 2 Posts

Default

I have one of each. The PPKs sits in my safe and the p3at in my waitband.
The Walther is sure pretty and feels good to handle.(for me)My PPKs is about 40 yrs. old, in mint shape. Thats one reason it stays in the safe.

__________________
Pounce is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2007, 03:37 PM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Adam5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7
Default

I carried a late model, S&W made PPK/S for about a year. Its was 100% reliable and very accurate. It also concealed easily. I would still be carrying it, but decided to consolidate my pistol calibers and sold it to buy a 9mm carry gun.

__________________
GeorgiaCarry.org Member

GeorgiaPacking.org
Adam5 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes