Need Opinions Sig 220 or 229 - Which to Keep - Page 2
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns >

Need Opinions Sig 220 or 229 - Which to Keep


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2010, 05:43 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Dzscubie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: El Paso,Texas
Posts: 2,521
Liked 40 Times on 19 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT_Calle View Post
I think the general consensus around here is that .45 is better than .40. I really want to get a P220 Equinox.
St Calle, when you decide you want a Sig let me know. I have a friend who has an in with Sig and I can get you your sig at a greatly reduced price then if you buy from a dealer. He also gets in used Sig's from police departments that replace weapons. He just had a P220 for $500 that was used by an old detective who only put it in a drawer of his desk as he was ROAD (retired on active duty) and was only waiting to retire. It looked like it only had a mag or two through it and the spare magazines looked like they had never been loaded.
__________________
"I never killed anyone who didn't need killing."
JW Hardin
Dzscubie is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 12:12 AM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,705
Liked 384 Times on 303 Posts
Likes Given: 57

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elemental View Post
BTW...I don't carry, so the smaller size of the 229 is not really a factor.
You probably answered your question right there.

Both are fine guns. Unless the compact 229 is somehow more comfortable for you to handle, taking the 220 makes sense. Most prefer full framed guns if carry isn't an issue, and I know I'd prefer the SAO p220.

As far as cash value goes, they're of similar value if in similar condition.

I'd say:

1) If one is in dramatically better condition, take it...
2) If similar condition, take whatever "feels" better in your hand...
3) Still undecided? Tie goes to the p220.


FWIW- Don't worry too much about the caliber. 45acp is an outstnading round, but 40sw will get the job done just fine and it's very affordable. Also, the recoil in the smaller .40sw might actually be greater than the full-sized .45...but is probably negligible between the two.
sweeper22 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 12:30 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 221
Default

I own one of each of those guns. The ONLY advantage the 229 has over the 220 is capacity. You said you don't carry, so it is not an advantage to you.
Keep the 220.
The 45 is a true meat eater. It was designed to one thing. Kill stuff the size of a man.
By the way, I wish I had your tough decision.
__________________
"My thinker must be broken"
jimbobpissypants is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 11:08 AM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Elemental's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 40
Default

Thanks to everyone for the responses. I'm pretty sure I'm going to hang on to the 220. They are both in like-new condition, and I just like the way it feels in my hand. Funny thing is, I haven't had a chance to shoot either one of these yet, so it's kind of a shot in the dark (pun intended).
Elemental is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 11:49 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1463 Times on 819 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elemental View Post
Cane, forgive my ignorance, but can you explain why the choice should be obvious?
Is the 1911 in my siggy any hint?

I think the .40 S&W was an answer to a non-existent question.

Need Opinions Sig 220 or 229 - Which to Keep - Semi-Auto Handguns
__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 04:42 PM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Elemental's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 40
Default

Ok, point taken. I didn't mention it in my orginal post, but I also have a Colt Gold Cup and a couple other .45's. I guess that was partly why I was considering hanging onto the Sig 229 in .40 S&W. But after reading what everyone has to say here, I think I'll keep the 220.
Elemental is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 11:16 PM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,705
Liked 384 Times on 303 Posts
Likes Given: 57

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by canebrake View Post
I think the .40 S&W was an answer to a non-existent question.
Damn, then what the hell was the 357sig an answer to?

Elemental- If anything, I'd expect the .40sw to actually kick more because of the compact frame. If the p220 feels better in your hands, it's a pretty safe decision. And you just added one heck of a firearm to your arsenal.
sweeper22 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 11:27 PM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1463 Times on 819 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweeper22 View Post
Damn, then what the hell was the 357sig an answer to?
What is a handgun ammo abortion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweeper22 View Post
Elemental- If anything, I'd expect the .40sw to actually kick more because of the compact frame. If the p220 feels better in your hands, it's a pretty safe decision. And you just added one heck of a firearm to your arsenal.
The .40 S&W is a "Snappier" round than a .45 ACP in just about any platform. A .45 rarely needs a compensator for muzzle control but the .40 would find it beneficial in most applications.

I'm a recoil junkie so that isn't the issue with the .40 and me. I can shoot .45 ACP ALL day long with a smile on my face. When I reach 50 rounds of .40 S&W the fun has long gone! It's just a buzz-kill round for me.
__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2010, 11:49 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,705
Liked 384 Times on 303 Posts
Likes Given: 57

Default

I only have a 9mm (CZ 75b) and a 357sig/40sw (Sig226, two barrels) for now. And ironically since you mention it, the 40 barrel is in fact ported.

Maybe I just don't know what I'm missing yet. Hope to "progress" into 45acp soon enough...next pistol is probably a 1911. I'd actually like to get into a p220 as well, since I've been happy with the 226.

The 357 is fun to shoot and (on paper at least) boasts impressive ballistics. But with that said, it's not the most practical round. Fun though.
sweeper22 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2010, 12:14 AM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
canebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: 150 miles NE of Sloppy Joe's Bar
Posts: 21,941
Liked 1463 Times on 819 Posts
Likes Given: 1290

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweeper22 View Post
I only have a 9mm (CZ 75b) and a 357sig/40sw (Sig226, two barrels) for now. And ironically since you mention it, the 40 barrel is in fact ported.

Maybe I just don't know what I'm missing yet. Hope to "progress" into 45acp soon enough...next pistol is probably a 1911. I'd actually like to get into a p220 as well, since I've been happy with the 226.

The 357 is fun to shoot and (on paper at least) boasts impressive ballistics. But with that said, it's not the most practical round. Fun though.
I'm not a caliber bigot to harass members, just an old man that has uber respect for a handgun round that is 106 years old. (And still killing goblins just like JM Browning designed!)

I have little need for boutique rounds designed to sell new handgun platforms or to provide a no-kick WEAPON to a gun totin' Nancy-boy.

Need Opinions Sig 220 or 229 - Which to Keep - Semi-Auto Handguns

Besides, necked cartridges are for rifles!
__________________
http://i695.photobucket.com/albums/v...brake02jpg.jpg

http://i1060.photobucket.com/albums/...ps18cfbeae.jpg

Get her dirty, then clean her so she starts to respect you. When her trust is complete, she will serve you well for a lifetime!

"...if doves shot back, there wouldn't be a need for a bag limit."
- orangello
canebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Opinions on the S&W 40-06 rob_6095 Semi-Auto Handguns 11 01-15-2010 10:55 PM
Need your opinions DonnyKC The Club House 16 06-23-2009 01:02 PM
Looking for a CCW .40 Opinions? Dbl-Tap Semi-Auto Handguns 31 02-26-2009 07:44 PM
Opinions about Rem. 700 SPS? Curt33 General Rifle Discussion 14 01-20-2009 12:34 AM
.270 Win. or .270 WSM..Need Opinions WhiteWolf4 General Rifle Discussion 14 11-30-2008 11:56 AM