Need input on Hi Point 9mm - Page 2
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > Need input on Hi Point 9mm

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2009, 06:26 PM   #11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 139
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

The Hi-point is one ugly pistol.

__________________
741512th is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2009, 10:58 PM   #12
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Mac79912's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 20
Default

I have a Hi Point that cost me $50.The gunshop was desperate to get the gun out the door.It is heavy but I have had no issues with mine.And if it ever jams on you you can use it as a brick to hit someone upside the head.They are fun to shoot but I would never tell anyone to buy it for a CCW.Save a little more money and get something you will be happy with.

__________________
Mac79912 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 12:03 AM   #13
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DonnyKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 202
Default

dont waste your money on a hi-point for a ccw gun. there heavy as hell. there made cheap. there a fun gun to plink. but i would not trust my life to it at all. if you are looking for a light weight ccw gun. get a glock. or a taurus pt111

__________________
"SIC VIS PACEM, PARABELLUM" - IF YOU WANT PEACE PREPARE FOR WAR!!!
DonnyKC is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2009, 05:36 PM   #14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: N. M.
Posts: 9
Default

I always like to read the HI-Point posts and replies. Lots of differing opinions and I wonder how many are based on actual experience. I bought one a couple of years ago just to play with. My local gunshop sells them as fast as he can get them and doesn't have complaints about them.

What did I determine from actually shooting and modifying a C-9? Here are my findings from actually shooting the thing. Looks: It's ugly, so's a Glock. It's heavy, so it doesn't have a lot of recoil. It is suprisingly accurate, especially for something that cost me $129 dollars. Ammo: I've shot WW hollow points, Blaser FMJ, and Monarch, both steel and brass cased FMJ with no FTFs, no stovepipes, and no jams. It hasn't stumbled one time. That is with good and the cheapest of cheap ammo. I'm thinking of doing some handloads just to see what happens. Don't get me wrong.I'm not suggesting that a Hi-Point is anywhere near the gun that a Colt, S&W, Ruger, and several other brands are. But it isn't the piece of junk that many make it out to be. If I had to use it to defend myself it wouldn't worry me a bit.

The grips are slick. I used a Dremel and a small round diamond point tool and stippled them. Now it is easy to hold. The trigger was very heavy. A little experiment with the sear spring, or what ever you call iin a Hi-Point, and it has a much better trigger.

__________________
Arrowhead is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:29 AM   #15
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SGT-MILLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,354
Liked 6 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Lets try this. I will post some facts about the Hi-Point, and people can make their best educated decision based on that information.

As a side note, I have owned, and fired the .380, 9mm, and the .45 ACP Hi-Point pistols. I have experience with these firearms, but I will leave that out since my experience doesn't really make a difference to anyone but me in the end.

Note 1:

Most people know that the Hi-Point company (aka MKS / Beemiller) uses the metal compound known as Zamak-3 for their slides on their handguns. Zamak-3 is also referred to as "Pot Metal". Here is a quick basic description of Pot Metal and it's limitations (credit to Wikipedia).

Pot metal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Pot metal is a slang term that refers to alloys that consist of inexpensive, low-melting point metals used to make fast, inexpensive castings. There is no scientific metallurgical standard for pot metal; common metals in pot metal include zinc, lead, copper, tin, magnesium, aluminium, iron, and cadmium. The primary advantage of pot metal is that it is quick and easy to cast. Due to its low melting temperature no sophisticated foundry equipment is needed and specialized molds are not necessary. It is sometimes used to experiment with molds and ideas before using metals of higher quality. It is sometime referred to as white metal, die-cast zinc, or monkey metal.[1] Examples of items created from pot metal include toys, furniture fittings, tool parts, electronics components, and automotive parts.[citation needed]
Pot metal can be prone to instability over time, as it has a tendency to bend, distort, crack, shatter, and pit with age.[1] The low boiling point of zinc and the fast cooling of the newly-cast part often allow air bubbles to remain within the cast part, weakening the metal.[1] Many of the components of pot metal are susceptible to corrosion from airborne acids and other contaminants, and the internal corrosion of the metal often causes the decorative plating to flake off.[citation needed] Pot metal is not easily glued, soldered or welded.[1]
At one time, "pot metal" referred to a copper alloy that was primarily alloyed with lead. 67% Cu, 29% Pb & 4% Sb and 80 Cu, 20% Pb were common formulations.[2]
The primary component of pot metal is zinc, but often the caster adds other metals to the mix to strengthen the cast part, improve the flow of the molten metal, or to reduce cost.[dubiousdiscuss] With a low melting point of 419 °C (786 °F), zinc is often alloyed with other metals including lead, tin, aluminium and copper.




Read the limitations carefully as determine for yourself if this substance is strong and stable enough for prolonged use in a firearm (take into consideration the constant exposure to high pressures from fired rounds on a regular basis).


Note 2:


As you all may know, the handguns from Hi-Point have an MSRP of around 180 dollars (JCP .40 and .45) or lower. This makes for a very inexpensive firearm. Taking the standard business practices into account, one can only figure out that the handgun itself cost much less to produce.


An example would be if the handgun retails at 180 dollars, the dealer maybe purchased it at around 100 dollars or less. With that in mind, the company originally selling to the dealer needs to make a profit also. With that said, there is a very good chance that the company is most likely putting about 40-50 dollars into each handgun. Think of the overhead, wages, supplies, maintainence, etc.... and that will figure into the dealer price.


Here's a few questions I ask all of you to ask yourself when purchasing a new firearm, regardless of model.


1. What are the materials used and how is the quality of those materials (is there the possibility of the company cutting corners in order to cut costs)?


2. What quality control is put into the development of this firearm (i.e. can a gun be produced with good quality when only 40-50 dollars is spent per gun from start to finished product)?


3. What is the track record of the company producing the firearm?


4. (MOST IMPORTANT) Does this firearm fit your needs and wants?

__________________
"TRAIN WITH WHAT YOU HAVE, NOT WITH WHAT YOU WISH YOU HAVE."
SGT-MILLER is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:33 AM   #16
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
DonnyKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT-MILLER View Post
Lets try this. I will post some facts about the Hi-Point, and people can make their best educated decision based on that information.

As a side note, I have owned, and fired the .380, 9mm, and the .45 ACP Hi-Point pistols. I have experience with these firearms, but I will leave that out since my experience doesn't really make a difference to anyone but me in the end.

Note 1:

Most people know that the Hi-Point company (aka MKS / Beemiller) uses the metal compound known as Zamak-3 for their slides on their handguns. Zamak-3 is also referred to as "Pot Metal". Here is a quick basic description of Pot Metal and it's limitations (credit to Wikipedia).

Pot metal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Pot metal is a slang term that refers to alloys that consist of inexpensive, low-melting point metals used to make fast, inexpensive castings. There is no scientific metallurgical standard for pot metal; common metals in pot metal include zinc, lead, copper, tin, magnesium, aluminium, iron, and cadmium. The primary advantage of pot metal is that it is quick and easy to cast. Due to its low melting temperature no sophisticated foundry equipment is needed and specialized molds are not necessary. It is sometimes used to experiment with molds and ideas before using metals of higher quality. It is sometime referred to as white metal, die-cast zinc, or monkey metal.[1] Examples of items created from pot metal include toys, furniture fittings, tool parts, electronics components, and automotive parts.[citation needed]
Pot metal can be prone to instability over time, as it has a tendency to bend, distort, crack, shatter, and pit with age.[1] The low boiling point of zinc and the fast cooling of the newly-cast part often allow air bubbles to remain within the cast part, weakening the metal.[1] Many of the components of pot metal are susceptible to corrosion from airborne acids and other contaminants, and the internal corrosion of the metal often causes the decorative plating to flake off.[citation needed] Pot metal is not easily glued, soldered or welded.[1]
At one time, "pot metal" referred to a copper alloy that was primarily alloyed with lead. 67% Cu, 29% Pb & 4% Sb and 80 Cu, 20% Pb were common formulations.[2]
The primary component of pot metal is zinc, but often the caster adds other metals to the mix to strengthen the cast part, improve the flow of the molten metal, or to reduce cost.[dubiousdiscuss] With a low melting point of 419 °C (786 °F), zinc is often alloyed with other metals including lead, tin, aluminium and copper.




Read the limitations carefully as determine for yourself if this substance is strong and stable enough for prolonged use in a firearm (take into consideration the constant exposure to high pressures from fired rounds on a regular basis).


Note 2:


As you all may know, the handguns from Hi-Point have an MSRP of around 180 dollars (JCP .40 and .45) or lower. This makes for a very inexpensive firearm. Taking the standard business practices into account, one can only figure out that the handgun itself cost much less to produce.


An example would be if the handgun retails at 180 dollars, the dealer maybe purchased it at around 100 dollars or less. With that in mind, the company originally selling to the dealer needs to make a profit also. With that said, there is a very good chance that the company is most likely putting about 40-50 dollars into each handgun. Think of the overhead, wages, supplies, maintainence, etc.... and that will figure into the dealer price.


Here's a few questions I ask all of you to ask yourself when purchasing a new firearm, regardless of model.


1. What are the materials used and how is the quality of those materials (is there the possibility of the company cutting corners in order to cut costs)?


2. What quality control is put into the development of this firearm (i.e. can a gun be produced with good quality when only 40-50 dollars is spent per gun from start to finished product)?


3. What is the track record of the company producing the firearm?


4. (MOST IMPORTANT) Does this firearm fit your needs and wants?
thanks for the facts..
__________________
"SIC VIS PACEM, PARABELLUM" - IF YOU WANT PEACE PREPARE FOR WAR!!!
DonnyKC is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:46 AM   #17
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stafford, Virginia,The state of insanity.
Posts: 14,043
Liked 36 Times on 30 Posts

Default

Ask yourself one question...

What is your life and the life of your loved ones worth?

I know my life is worth a whole lot more than a Hi-point.

__________________
cpttango30 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009, 03:45 AM   #18
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Merc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Overland Park,Kansas
Posts: 28
Default

When searching for a firearm that will be used for an application such as CCW, I tend to not look so much at price. Reliability is worth allot more than Hi Point has to offer. As a plinker (or a throw gun) I am sure they have their place. Unfortunately, it is not in my safe, tool box, tackle box or scrap metal box. I have fired a few of these in 9mm and .45 with very poor results.

If I can not rely on it 100% then I will not buy it, or even have it given to me. When SHTF and you have to grab something, I would rather it be something I know will "just work".
__________________
Merc
ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε

“Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion... in private self-defense.”
John Adams (American 2nd US President (1797-1801), 1735-1826)
“The goal of socialism is communism.”
Vladimir Lenin (Russian Founder of the Russian Communist Party, leader of the Russian Revolution of 1917, 1870-1924)

Last edited by Merc187; 03-25-2009 at 07:29 AM.
Merc187 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2009, 09:45 PM   #19
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 147
Default

I have an indigent friend (not employed) who bought one of these just so he could shoot something. Aside from the appearance (butt ugly) it seems to function well and when I have shot it, I have had no issues with it. As for the construction of the gun, pot metal, et al, I doubt these guns are supposed to be subjected to constant firing. I would put this gun in the occassional firing catagory where you fire it just to make sure it still functions if you ever need it. I doubt I would ever buy one, and the only "budget" gun I own is a Bersa Thunder .380 which is pretty well made. Even so, all guns have their detractors. If you use a gun within its limits, then the gun should serve its intended purpose. For example: I don't plan on shooting my Bersa like I do my SIG Mosquito or my CZ 75B. I shoot a couple of hundred rounds through them each time I go to the range; I usually go 3 to 4 times a month. I will probably shoot it once or twice a year, maybe 50-100 rounds each time just to keep sharp with it. That being said, just keep in mind what a Hi-Point pistol is meant to be and it should serve you well. As for carrying one for SD, I should think it would get tiring after a couple of hours.

__________________
chucksolo69 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 12:43 AM   #20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1
Default Hi Point

I have the hi point 9mm and 380 ACP and they are both great pistols. The look is bulky but still a rugged and accurate weapon for the price. I have a Jennings 9 and 380 as well, and have problems with the heavy trigger and certain Ammo. Between the two...I suggest the Hi-Point.

__________________
drdarwinn is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
input ur 7 mm RUM load test David1 Ammunition & Reloading 0 02-09-2009 04:47 PM
Need Input for Possible Purchase SGT-MILLER Semi-Auto Handguns 13 02-05-2009 05:42 PM
About to buy my first rifle, need input Knat General Rifle Discussion 20 10-27-2008 06:06 AM
what kind of rifle sling is this - 2 point? 3 point? lowead Firearm Accessories & Gear 3 10-17-2008 11:02 PM
RNC wants your input Gramps Politics, Religion and Controversy 7 07-18-2008 06:43 PM