Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > Glock and the Striker Fired Pistol

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-23-2012, 02:40 PM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 17
Liked 9 Times on 4 Posts

Default Glock and the Striker Fired Pistol

Glock and the Striker Fired Pistol

And the award for the first production polymer framed, striker fired pistol goes to the German arms manufacturer … Heckler & Koch for the innovative VP70!

‘Heresy!’ cried the Glock crowd. Gaston Glock’s model 17 revolutionized the modern firearms industry and he wasn’t German, he was Austrian!

Sorry, but the record is clear. Glock wasn’t the first to produce a striker-fired pistol. H&K beat them by 12 years in 1970 with the VP70. Manufactured for the law enforcement market, it was capable of full auto fire and the semi automatic version became popular in Italian civilian market. An import restriction largely kept it out of US hands and draws a lot of blank stares when mentioned at your local gun shop.

Glock’s initial fame in the US can largely be attributed to timing. US Law Enforcement was making the transition away from the .38 Special +P to 9mm firearms. Articles and movies claiming that polymer pistols couldn’t be detected by screening methods of the day. And okay, the Glock preformed well and everyone loved to shoot the ugly little beast.

And the striker fired pistol was special with a largely unknown functionality. Working without a typical hammer or firing pin, the spring loaded striker is compressed inside the slide until the weapon is ready to fire. When the trigger is pulled, the safeties are disengaged, and the mechanism, usually an extension of the trigger bar, makes contact and pulls the striker back under spring tension. This continues to increase as the striker is pulled to the rear. At the end of the pull, this trigger bar’s extension pulls or drops off the part of the striker it was up against, and releases it, allowing it to travel forward under the power of the spring and make contact with the primer of the chambered round setting off the cartridge.

And just like other semi automatic pistols when fired, the slide moves rearward under recoil, ejects the spent round and chambers a new one. The pistol is then ready to fire the next round.

On the plus side, the striker fire assembly contains less internal parts and less parts equates to less ‘things to go wrong’. Glock has created a reputation for reliability. Disassembly, and reassembly for that matter, is quick, easy and I never have parts left over.

Most Glock owners will talk about the easy trigger pull that is generally much lighter than Double Action systems. Contrary to the DA system, the shooter experiences the same weight of trigger pull each time. Meaning the shooter does not have to adjust from a first long and heavy double action pull to a second, short and light single action shot. Consistency of experience means a lot when it counts allowing the shooter to remain on target.

The downside list can be long and sociologically complicated. Primary is the lack of an external safety. Imagine the look on the faces of the guys at the range when you unholster your pistol and loudly announce it has no external safety. It’s just not something everyone is comfortable with even if, such as in the case of the Glock, the safety in internal. And you wouldn’t be wrong for being overly skeptical about the little safety lever on the trigger.

When someone says, “if you don’t want to fire the gun, don’t pull the trigger”, you have the right to be uneasy. News stories linking the Glock to accidental discharges and even accidental death are concerning as even the most experienced among us make mistakes. Firearms safety training, even in its most rudimentary form, emphasizes not placing your finger on the trigger until you are ready to fire. But in a world where the fault is everyone’s but the person handling the weapon, what can you expect?

Some manufacturers, such as Springfield Armory, add a ‘beavertail’ safety similar to the Colt 1911 .45 ACP. This protects the gun from inadvertent snags on the trigger firing the weapon. You must to have a firm grip on the Springfield before it will fire.

The next ‘con’ is the lack of a ‘second strike capability’. When double action pistol is fired, if the round fails to fire, the trigger resets and you simply pull it again, and hopefully igniting a ‘hard primer’.

On a striker fired pistol, the shooter receives a loud ‘snap’ instead of a ‘bang’. As no ‘second strike capability’ is available, the shooter must cycle the pistol ejecting the non-firing round and loading new. Cycling becomes a major drawback as many will take their sights off their target to perform the action and then, reestablish their sight picture on the target. (And I understand the argument that a ‘misfire’ on any pistol causes the natural impulse to look the weapon over to discover the issue.)

The bottom line is the part that most in their excitement to become part of the crowd with the ‘cool’ guns fails to consider – What are my needs and How am I going to use the weapon? Defining your needs and asking questions about your findings not only makes you a more savvy consumer, but a happier, more satisfied one as well.

__________________

Last edited by robocop10mm; 11-26-2012 at 11:54 AM. Reason: snaking the link in
YankeeTactical-com is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 11-23-2012, 03:38 PM   #2
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
eborden1122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Birthplace of Elvis
Posts: 443
Liked 20 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Im not trying to be a smarta$$ or anything like that so please do not take it that way. It just struck me as odd. Maybe I am the only one nosey enough to ask. This is a fairly long post and obviously took a bit to compose. My question is why?? I noticed that you were not a "supporting member" so I am guessing this is not an article from the website. Or was this just a copy and paste out of a magazine that you found interesting. Again, just curious as to why. Happy Holidays!!!

__________________
EVERYBODY should be a supporting member of this board. Nobody can be that damn cheap.......

HOTTY TODDY!!!!
eborden1122 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 08:24 PM   #3
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
HOSSFLY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lufkin,Tx
Posts: 6,932
Liked 2175 Times on 1468 Posts
Likes Given: 1191

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eborden1122 View Post
Im not trying to be a smarta$$ or anything like that so please do not take it that way. It just struck me as odd. Maybe I am the only one nosey enough to ask. This is a fairly long post and obviously took a bit to compose. My question is why?? I noticed that you were not a "supporting member" so I am guessing this is not an article from the website. Or was this just a copy and paste out of a magazine that you found interesting. Again, just curious as to why. Happy Holidays!!!
He puts this stuff on every fourm that will allow it-
Been kicked from one i visit--
Trying to pull attention to his websight ---------
__________________

Texan By Birth & Choice
USMC/VIET NAM VET

HOSSFLY is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 11:24 PM   #4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Lockport,Illinois
Posts: 748
Liked 334 Times on 203 Posts
Likes Given: 260

Default

Capt. Cutandpaste strikes again!

__________________

''I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a-hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same from them."
J.B. Books

JD1969 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2012, 11:32 PM   #5
Supporting Member
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
eborden1122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Birthplace of Elvis
Posts: 443
Liked 20 Times on 18 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Damn that is weak.

__________________
EVERYBODY should be a supporting member of this board. Nobody can be that damn cheap.......

HOTTY TODDY!!!!
eborden1122 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 02:42 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
BeyondTheBox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,597
Liked 279 Times on 243 Posts

Default

I enjoyed reading it actually. Most of it was just obvious info that anyone who's shot guns for a while knows, but still something worth reading I'd say.

I was actually enlightened by something I hadn't yet thought of in my staunch sticktoitiveness to single action trigger systems. A downside I'd not thought of and nobody has brought to my attention to this point, that should a round not fire, for some reason, a single action, as opposed to double has to be recocked, where a double can just pull trigger again to attempt again. I've yet to have this issue with any centerfire round, but could see the possibility of it nonetheless which should always be taken into account.

__________________

Last edited by BeyondTheBox; 11-24-2012 at 02:49 AM.
BeyondTheBox is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-24-2012, 05:27 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
SSGN_Doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,062
Liked 1918 Times on 1144 Posts
Likes Given: 410

Default

Yep, he posts articles all over that can be a but dated in info, but generally fairly well thought out. A few holes here and there but, ok.

I liked the VP 70. It was also gas assisted if I remember right. Not a traditional locked breach with tilting barrel. It was something more like the CZ 52.

Glock just took the polymers and the striker fired system, combined th with the Browning lock-up, removed the barrel lugs and went to using the chamber hood to engage the slide. Then made a modular trigger system with fewer parts and easier to mass produce. Then he could make guns at a price point HK couldn't compete with.

__________________
SSGN_Doc is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Hammer vs Striker Fired ChiefWiggums General Handgun Discussion 6 04-26-2012 01:52 AM
Striker fired vs double actiom Hectocotylus General Handgun Discussion 17 01-27-2012 09:32 PM
Striker fired pistols Gojubrian General Handgun Discussion 15 10-14-2009 08:43 PM
Striker-fired Jam genie Semi-Auto Handguns 2 10-08-2008 03:56 AM
Striker Fired Handguns pacman General Handgun Discussion 1 07-11-2007 12:04 AM