Beretta 92FS - Opinions? Warnings?
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > Beretta 92FS - Opinions? Warnings?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2010, 04:11 AM   #1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JoeB1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 73
Default Beretta 92FS - Opinions? Warnings?

I'm currently planning on purchasing my first handgun.

I've tested different caliber handguns, of several makes and models. 9mm the caliber I find most comfortable at this time. A friend of mine came back from active duty and bought a used Taurus PT92 from a local pawn shop. We took it out and fired a few boxes of rounds and I loved it.

Although, the downside of that particular weapon is that it seemed to have an ever-so-slight rattle to it, nothing that effected firing it, but made me worry about the weapon's build. Ultimately, it could have just been neglected by the previous owner and was in need of a little repair.

Decided to be an informed buyer and Wikipedia and Google the model. Found that it is very similar to the Beretta 92 due to Beretta handing the design specs over to Taurus.

Although, I feel it would be safe to assume that Beretta would make their weapon bit more refined then Taurus' 'reproduction'. However, I wouldn't know for sure.

All other reviews I've read of the 92FS says it is a reliable, all-around good starter weapon (with the exception of it's weight.) Personally, I like it being on the heavier side.

So my question being, after all my exhaustive research I really haven't seen any 'this gun sucks' reviews, or anything on it's quirks that may break the deal for me.

Any one a current owner that may have any useful info for me? (Please and thanks! )

__________________
JoeB1987 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today - It's Free!

Are you a firearms enthusiast? Then we hope you will join the community. You will gain access to post, create threads, private message, upload images, join groups and more.

Firearms Talk is owned and operated by fellow firearms enthusiasts. We strive to offer a non-commercial community to learn and share information.

Join FirearmsTalk.com Today! - Click Here


Old 06-03-2010, 10:17 PM   #2
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jakebrake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 497
Liked 438 Times on 223 Posts
Likes Given: 92

Default

former 92 owner checking in. i wouldn't hold my breath wating for a "they suck" response. once you get past the weight, they are a fine pistol. never had a jam, or problem in any way. i like a heavy firearm as well, (well, i used to...i'm getting old). but, they are predictable, and reliable.

the taurus vs. the beretta? my opinion, but, not even close. fire the two, trigger pull, batter placed safety. beretta, hands down.

__________________
jakebrake is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 10:42 PM   #3
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
JonM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rochester WI,Rochester WI
Posts: 18,098
Liked 6033 Times on 3163 Posts
Likes Given: 432

Default

i was in the army during the switch from 1911 to 92fs. had the opportunity to run a bunch of ammo through several. they tended to jam up due to excessive overheating after several mags. same amount of ammo shot through the 1911 flawless function. the 1911's were of ww2 make various remingtons colts ithacas etc. over extended use there were frame cracks in several that had to be sent back to depot maintenance. under field conditions the open slides tended to collect debris. they didnt wear well over time.

from this i developed a low opinion of the 92 series and berretas in general.

just my opinion, but you would do well to cnsider the springfield XD series, hi-power browning, cz75, or 1911. all those are far better than the 92 series

__________________
JonM is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2010, 10:53 PM   #4
FAA licensed bugsmasher
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ScottA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Davenport,IA
Posts: 6,990
Liked 2337 Times on 1258 Posts
Likes Given: 844

Default

Beretta makes fine guns. The consensus is they make a much better gun than Taurus.

That said, you should really check out some different models. Springfield XD's and XDm's, 1911's, Glocks (if you like blocks of wood), Hi Power, etc...

Don't go buy a gun, or one gun design just on the one experience. Shop around a bit. Have some fun. It's even more fun than test driving new cars. And if you shop around, you'll ultimately wind up with a gun you enjoy and keep much longer.

__________________

Scott

Quote:
If you're not representing Jesus in a way that makes people want to hang out with you, you're doing it wrong.
Quote:
Those who refuse to participate in politics shall be governed by their inferiors. -Plato
Join the NRA
ScottA is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 03:25 AM   #5
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Endor
Posts: 335
Liked 10 Times on 7 Posts
Likes Given: 16

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonM View Post
just my opinion, but you would do well to cnsider the springfield XD series, hi-power browning, cz75, or 1911. all those are far better than the 92 series
In my opinion the Cz-75B is one of the best built and comfortable 9mm in existance. Every single person who has shot mine has said very favorable things about it as well.

But the Beretta is a fine handgun as well. If it feels more comfortable to you then buy that huge 9mm ASAP...
__________________

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix

Biohazurd is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 05:04 AM   #6
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Deadman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SE Tennessee USA, near the banjo music.
Posts: 136
Default

Long time Beretta 96 owner here, it was one of the best handling and most accurate hanguns I've ever owned. I traded it off about a year ago and wish I had it back. The Berretta 92 is a safe and very good first choice handgun imo.

__________________
Thrust in thy sickle, reap the harvest of the Earth.
Deadman1 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 05:18 AM   #7
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Jpyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sewell,NJ
Posts: 4,832
Liked 776 Times on 449 Posts
Likes Given: 492

Default

Have a 92 FS and have been very happy with it. Shoots anything you feed it, low recoil due to weight and balance, quick follow up shots.

Weight is an issue, 2#s empty, and it is too bulky, in my opinion, to effectively conceal if that is your intent. But for a truck or home defense weapon, or even just a good range gun it will do the job. Only shortcoming is the lack of a rail on the civilian 92 FS. You need to get the M9A1 if you want to mount a light or laser.

Completely different frame style and design from an XD or Glock so if you want a different feel or a more readily concealable 3" or 4" barrel I would give those a try as well.

__________________

"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals.... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of." (Albert Gallatin of the New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789)

"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

Jpyle is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 06:08 AM   #8
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,469
Liked 269 Times on 211 Posts
Likes Given: 36

Default

Nothing wrong with a 92fs. But I would recommend that you also investigate the CZ 75 line and Browning Hi-Powers. If you do, and you still like the 92fs...well, then that's the pistol for you, and you'll know you've made the right decision.

It's not a bad pistol by any means. I've just heard minor complaints here and there, whereas the CZ and Browning experiences I'm aware are almost exclusively positive.

__________________
sweeper22 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:21 PM   #9
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Galveston,texas
Posts: 42
Liked 4 Times on 3 Posts
Likes Given: 7

Default 92fs

I've had one since i re-started shooting last summer....it's only the best pistol i've ever shot. Accurate, little recoil, and my wife has started to use it at the range because of those factors. Even a pure novice should be able to use it with little problems, given that they do take some training on use and safety.

__________________

Last edited by jeffxc; 06-04-2010 at 09:21 PM. Reason: left out a few words here and there
jeffxc is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2010, 09:39 PM   #10
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
ninjatoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Near Saginaw,Michigan
Posts: 1,501
Liked 178 Times on 132 Posts
Likes Given: 44

Default

The military places one in the hand of thousands of 18 year olds every year,so that should say something about them.My friend has a 92 brigadier and a 96 and swears by them.

__________________

S&W 915 9mm
Mossberg 500 Mariner 12ga
1945 Win 94
Ruger MKIII 22/45 4"
Savage MK II
Ruger SP101 .357
Kung-Fu Moves

ninjatoth is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
Beretta 90-two vs 92fs roosterjuicer Semi-Auto Handguns 8 08-16-2012 06:05 AM
Beretta 92FS The_Rican Semi-Auto Handguns 11 05-19-2010 12:22 PM
Beretta 92FS weld Engraving & Refinishing 4 08-23-2009 03:24 AM
Beretta PX4 Storm 9mm vs 92fs Lancer69 General Handgun Discussion 1 07-27-2009 08:32 PM