.357 sig question - Page 7
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > .357 sig question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2013, 10:45 PM   #61
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jjones45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 556
Liked 113 Times on 85 Posts

Default

Emp in 357 sig?

__________________
jjones45 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2013, 01:18 AM   #62
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
sweeper22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,469
Liked 269 Times on 211 Posts
Likes Given: 36

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjones45 View Post
Emp in 357 sig?
The short barrel might really mitigate the actual benefits of going from 9mm to 357sig in that case. Not sure, but quite likely in my opinion. If I'm carrying a 357sig, it'll probably be a Sig P239sas.

Just my take-- there are a lot of folks out there (speaking in terms of carry/HD) who chase the biggest blast without considering all the variables. I believe 9mm (ballistics, handling, capacity, frame size, repeatable on-target shots, etc) is the ideal caliber for a whole lot of people. I'm not saying it's some magic bullet, but it's just a really versatile 'vanilla' option. Arguably it's ideal for me as well. Yet my carry/HD pistols are 45acp...LOL.
__________________
"The Future is Unwritten"
sweeper22 is online now  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2013, 11:27 AM   #63
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Byron0022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 617
Liked 41 Times on 35 Posts
Likes Given: 6

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sweeper22
The short barrel might really mitigate the actual benefits of going from 9mm to 357sig in that case. Not sure, but quite likely in my opinion. If I'm carrying a 357sig, it'll probably be a Sig P239sas. Just my take-- there are a lot of folks out there (speaking in terms of carry/HD) who chase the biggest blast without considering all the variables. I believe 9mm (ballistics, handling, capacity, frame size, repeatable on-target shots, etc) is the ideal caliber for a whole lot of people. I'm not saying it's some magic bullet, but it's just a really versatile 'vanilla' option. Arguably it's ideal for me as well. Yet my carry/HD pistols are 45acp...LOL.
I rotated what I carried till I got the M&P subcompact. My XD-9 subcompact is a 9mm. I totally agree with you here, but I prefer a 45, I just can't find a everyday carry holster I like well enough to change right now.
__________________
Byron0022 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2013, 06:44 AM   #64
Concealed Carry Instructor
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
AR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 2,229
Liked 1108 Times on 710 Posts
Likes Given: 242

Default

I would like more info in the leg injury.

__________________
AR10 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2013, 03:28 PM   #65
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Liked 17 Times on 13 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bige91603
I really like the 357 SIG and 1911 platform. I would be in the market for one that is fairly priced
Sig is coming out with a 1911 in .357 Sig for 2014. Also a P938 in 22lr and a P290 in .380.
__________________
zeke4351 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2013, 12:35 AM   #66
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts

Default

My M&P .357 is basically a .40 anymore---no 357 to be had--40 is everywhere-----drop in factory barrel conversion is easy as can be

__________________
rugerfreak is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
.243 win load question and powder question Mantids88 Ammunition & Reloading 8 10-17-2010 12:55 AM