.357 sig question - Page 5
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of FirearmsTalk.com!    
Firearm & Gun Forum - FireArmsTalk.com > Handguns > Semi-Auto Handguns > .357 sig question

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2013, 06:18 PM   #41
hmh
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
hmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 669
Liked 163 Times on 113 Posts

Default

I would love to see a keltec sub 2000 in .357 Sig

__________________
hmh is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2013, 07:36 PM   #42
FTF_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Overkill0084's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Weber County, Utah
Posts: 4,656
Liked 3197 Times on 1605 Posts
Likes Given: 415

Default

.357 Sig:
It's a hot rod 9mm round specially developed for people who get their ammo provided by taxpayers. It's a bit hotter than 9 mm +p+, but not so much as you'd notice in actual use. It's easily found right beside the huge pile of .45 GAP ammo at every LGS.

__________________
Cheers,
Greg
MSgt, USAF, Retired
NRA Life Member

The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see. - Ayn Rand
Overkill0084 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2013, 08:53 PM   #43
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Liked 17 Times on 13 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffkaiser1989
Hey guys i was just looking around gander today and came across a few guns chambered for .357 sig. I have never heard of this round and was wondering if somebody could educate me about. Whats the recoil like? Are they hard to come by? Do they make good defensive rounds? Whats the penetration like? these are just some questions i have if anybody could help me out here id appreciate it thanks in advance
Here is a picture of .357 Sig entrance wound in a forum members leg from another forum.
image-3605659850.jpg  
__________________
zeke4351 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2013, 09:00 PM   #44
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Toledo oh
Posts: 316
Liked 85 Times on 69 Posts
Likes Given: 183

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zeke4351 View Post
Here is a picture of .357 Sig entrance wound in a forum members leg from another forum.
holy crap thats alot of damage on entry. did it exit?
__________________
  • Respect
  • Honor
  • Honesty
  • Courage
  • Loyalty
  • Rectitude
  • Benevolence
  • TRUST
Guns Owned

Para USA 1911 EXPERT .45ACP - sold

Sig Sauer P238 .380ACP - sold

Glock 23 Gen 3 .40 S&W

For reviews on various products check out my youtube!

https://www.youtube.com/user/Hellfire198362

CCW map

http://www.handgunlaw.us/LicMaps/ccwmap.php
jeffkaiser1989 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2013, 10:17 PM   #45
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
1911love's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,488
Liked 644 Times on 389 Posts
Likes Given: 12

Default

I'm really interested in the new Sig MPX SBR version in .357SIG. Anyone handle one yet? I haven't seen any vendors list them yet, I sure hope Sig isn't jerking us around now that their "honey badger killer" is getting all the press.

__________________
1911love is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2013, 10:57 PM   #46
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 28,709
Liked 22109 Times on 12429 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

just curious as what other might think of a 1911 type pistol in the 357 Sig?

good idea or bad?

just something that popped into my head.

__________________
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2013, 12:36 AM   #47
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
jjones45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 573
Liked 116 Times on 88 Posts

Default

I think any caliber in a 1911 is good or fun at the very least

__________________
jjones45 is online now  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2013, 01:15 AM   #48
Moderator
FTF_MODERATOR.png
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
 
robocop10mm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Austin,Texas, by God!!
Posts: 10,412
Liked 3052 Times on 1594 Posts
Likes Given: 295

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjim View Post
Swap out? Well yes, but generally you will only find that in a frame make for 40 S&W.

9 mm to 357 Sig, NO.
40 S&W to 357 Sig, YES, but you will need a conversion barrel.

Why a conversion barrel, because the chamber is 40 S&W while the barrel itself is 9 mm.

It is a slightly longer case than a 40 S&W, but can be used in 40 S&W mags. (so no new mags needed) OAL is about the same, but because of the neck of the 357 Sig case is so short that very few bullets can be used for reloading, the best would be the Hornady TXP 9 mm bullets in 124 or 125 grains.

Here in lies the problem with the 357 Sig. Most 40 S&W pistols are rated at 35,000 psi. The 357 Sig is a 38,000 psi round. Now do you want to beat up your pistol (springs & frame) with a hotter round. My choice was "NO" and put the conversion barrel away and went back to 40 S&W rounds.

If the gun is made as a 357 Sig (Sig or Glock) then you can use a conversion barrel to make it a 9 mm (will require new mags) or a 40 S&W (same mags).

Hope that helps.
Jim
Yes and no. The Sig does have higher operating pressures, but that has little effect on the frame. The pressures are contained in the barrel.

A bottleneck case acts differently than a straight wall case. Part of the pressures are balanced out by the shoulder. Texas DPS (State police) have been using the cartridge since the inception. I have heard of no problems like blown guns or accellerated wear
__________________

In life, strive to take the high road....It offers a better field of fire.
"Robo is right" Fuzzball

robocop10mm is offline  
Axxe55 Likes This 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2013, 01:32 AM   #49
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 530
Liked 60 Times on 49 Posts

Default

.357 sig is a ballistics and reloaders dream. The gold dot HP's are the standard defensive round.
The caliber has been around since the early 90's. My third gun was a P229 in 357 SIG. It was loud and the recoil was snappy. It was my conceal carry choice until I got a Glock 32. I never had a use for .40.
I reloaded a lot and 357 Sig uses 9mm components which were cheap and plentiful at the time.
This caliber is far beyond fad status, it is a proven man stopper in compact semi auto platforms.
I left the platform after more than 10 years of carrying it daily due to an employers decision. I wish I had not.

__________________
msup752 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2013, 01:37 AM   #50
The Apocalypse Is Coming.....
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 28,709
Liked 22109 Times on 12429 Posts
Likes Given: 53672

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop10mm View Post
Yes and no. The Sig does have higher operating pressures, but that has little effect on the frame. The pressures are contained in the barrel.

A bottleneck case acts differently than a straight wall case. Part of the pressures are balanced out by the shoulder. Texas DPS (State police) have been using the cartridge since the inception. I have heard of no problems like blown guns or accellerated wear
is the DPS still using the 357 Sig? i knew they were using it at one time, because a friend of mine retired from the DPS and he was carrying one up until he retired.
__________________
Axxe55 is offline  
 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Firearms Forum Replies Last Post
.243 win load question and powder question Mantids88 Ammunition & Reloading 8 10-17-2010 12:55 AM